dark light

Pete Truman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 2,604 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #321473
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    I’d be overcome at the prospect of having such beautiful creatures living so close. Foxes are much maligned animals promoted as pests by the ‘hunting, shooting, killing’ fraternity. Yes, they rampage and kill, mainly peoples unprotected chickens, but mainly the pheasants that the rich tossers breed to blast out of the sky for a bit of fun, and of course vast profits to themselves.
    They are Britains truly only natural large land based predators. Leave them be, buy a decent camera and take pictures to keep of a lucky incident.
    As far as cats are concerned, they should be cute enough to keep out of the way and avoid conflict, otherwise, it’s down to their own arrogance.

    in reply to: I'm no David Attenborough …. #1902492
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    I’d be overcome at the prospect of having such beautiful creatures living so close. Foxes are much maligned animals promoted as pests by the ‘hunting, shooting, killing’ fraternity. Yes, they rampage and kill, mainly peoples unprotected chickens, but mainly the pheasants that the rich tossers breed to blast out of the sky for a bit of fun, and of course vast profits to themselves.
    They are Britains truly only natural large land based predators. Leave them be, buy a decent camera and take pictures to keep of a lucky incident.
    As far as cats are concerned, they should be cute enough to keep out of the way and avoid conflict, otherwise, it’s down to their own arrogance.

    in reply to: General Discussion #321793
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    I watched the Sir Bobby Robson Trophy match at Newcastle on TV the other day, Old England V Old Germany and the glimpses of poor old Robson during the match made me worried for his future, he really did look a poor old boy, almost unrecognisable in fact.
    A lovely bloke, possibly too nice a chap to really deal with the nastiness of top level football and treated badly by the system.
    You were a good old, sincere bloke Bobby, have fun upstairs with Stan Matthews and the other immortals.

    in reply to: BBC announce Sir Bobby Robson has passed away. #1902681
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    I watched the Sir Bobby Robson Trophy match at Newcastle on TV the other day, Old England V Old Germany and the glimpses of poor old Robson during the match made me worried for his future, he really did look a poor old boy, almost unrecognisable in fact.
    A lovely bloke, possibly too nice a chap to really deal with the nastiness of top level football and treated badly by the system.
    You were a good old, sincere bloke Bobby, have fun upstairs with Stan Matthews and the other immortals.

    in reply to: Who do you think you are? – Kate Humble #1164491
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    I have to admit that some folk won’t talk about their past experiences and pass it on to their families, Lizzie and I talked about it after the programme, she knows little about what her family got up to in their various conflicts, her Grandfather for instance left his cap badge to her when he died, but she knows little about his wartime exploits. Her father fought the Soviets during the Hungarian uprising in 1957 but he won’t talk about it to her, only to me. Yes, he knows that I’m interested from an historical perspective, perhaps thats why, he suffered greatly, during and after the conflict, I know things about what he went through that Lizzie knows nothing about, he wouldn’t want me to tell her.
    Strangely enough, my family had some incredible characters who went through all sorts of battles, and without exception, were willing to talk about it with great enthusiasm, lucky for me, sad that they’ve all gone though, all of them, attacks on Murmansk convoys, Kamikazees, finding Belsen, how can you record these conversations, I tried to do it, but they weren’t bothered, as far as they were concerned , they were doing their bit, end of story.

    in reply to: Who do you think you are? – Kate Humble #1164723
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    What made me smile about this programme, was that the so called great icon of TV, Michael Parkinson, despite protestations, was rejected because his family origins were considered too boring to contemplate involving him in this programme.
    I think that Kate has been able to get into TV because of her obvious connections, her involvement with the Spring Watch programmes has been embarresing to watch sometimes because of her nervousness, probably caused by Bill Oddies self opinionation and subsequently of having mental problems, who knows.
    I don’t know about you lot, but I pretty much know the history of my family within the last few years, cetainly over the last century. I was surprised that such a media person seemed to not have a clue about her immediate forefathers, especially them having such an illustrious past in aviation and coal mining. I don’t know, was it put on for the camera, could she not of known that her grandfather was Bill Humble, I found it hard to believe that she hadn’t got a clue about her family history, she is 40 years old after all, a long time to go without questioning things within the family, I don’t like to think that we were being conned, but I wonder, it makes good TV after all.
    And, as my missus pointed out, was the Tempest the greatest fighter ever then, or was it just convenient to be told that because of the subject of the programme.
    I did think that Winkle Brown was the business, he’s 90 isn’t he, fantastic bloke.

    in reply to: Forgotten Ordnance #1165321
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    But we’ve always been told that it was a civilised war Res, whatever that means, probably like playing a game of snap with the Taliban.

    At my last dwelling, I knew of a few local incidents involving aircraft during WW2, I did find a live round in my garden, a 303, I’ve still got it, if I bash it with a hammer, will it make it safe?????????

    in reply to: Forgotten Ordnance #1165446
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Nearly 30 years ago we were doing some survey work on the now defunct Isle of Grain oil refinery. We went off to a pub with some of the management at lunchtime and I pointed out the Montgomery to them through the pub window and told them the story. They thought it was a wind up, there were no warnings made to the refinery about the existance of this ship and the possible dangers of it’s cargo, I bet that the directors of BP, safely ensconced in their London headquarters knew all about it.

    I recall when I was very young, on my first visit to France in the 50’s walking along the beach and finding this handle thingy sticking out of the sand. I picked it up and showed my old man, whose wartime experience in battles across Europe caused him to recognise it as a German stick grenade. Fortunately, a corner of the head had corroded and the explosives had leached out, or so he reckoned, I wanted to bring it home but I recall him chucking it out to sea as far as he could.

    Much closer to home, I recall taking my son and his mates to Legends at DX one year and while examining the Gibraltar Gun Turret, they dissapeared into the sandy shooting butt and came up with all sorts of remnants of bullets and shells, I was astonished that such stuff was still to be found in there, has it ever been cleaned up properly.

    in reply to: RIP Harry Patch – The Last Tommy #1167949
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Harry Patch didn’t want recognition, he only comparitively recently was prepared to talk about his experiences, as far as he was concerned he was an ordinary bloke thrown into the maelstrom like so many others.
    Have you read his biography, you may not agree with me, but it smacks of a ghost writer taking, but not quite, advantage of this lovely old boy, an issue that was carried on in the recent TV documentary, some of it made my missus and I cringe.
    I put the BBC News on yesterday evening and whatever had happened in the world, Harry got almost full coverage, and tributes from the great and not so good, he deserved it, but if he was able to look down, probably couldn’t care less, I think he was that sort of bloke.
    Well done Harry, lovely man, you were the last of the WW1 cannon fodder, sad to see you go, but none of us are immortal I’m afraid, even reluctant heroes like you.

    in reply to: More 4 TV:-Engineering Britains Superweapons #1170087
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Fascinating reply Res, why weren’t you invited to take part in the programme, or were you lurking off shot somewhere.

    Does anything satisfy your obvious inadequacies in life Chox.

    in reply to: More 4 TV:-Engineering Britains Superweapons #1170350
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Nice reply Resmorah, I have some wonderful video footage of the last celebratory Station flight of the Victors from Marham.
    I grew up in the knowledge what would happen when the 4 minute warning was given and these poor sods had to take to the air knowing that their families would be incinerated. I recall the exciting displays of the aircrews at the BoB displays at Waddington and Finningley, showing their skills at leaping into those Vulcans within minutes. Terrifying when you think of it, my old man built a fall out shelter in the bathroom during the Cuban Missile crisis.

    in reply to: RIAT 2009 #1173666
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Mildenhall only about 10 years ago, a pity that the US military don’t respect the esteem and sacrifices that our country do for them, go to Mildenhall or Lakenheath on any day and you can be guarunteed to see some interesting stuff, it’s normal, would it be that hard to just simply fly a few things to a UK airshow to show their appreciation of our help and support, probably more so than any other country in the world:

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/scan0050.jpg

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/scan0051.jpg

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/scan0052.jpg

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/scan0053.jpg

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/scan0059-1.jpg

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/scan0060-1.jpg

    Thats just the tip of the iceburg, the military commitment to justify their overseas spending should be publicised, their lack of appearances to home airshows when us aviation enthusiasts know they are flying about on a day to day basis doesn’t inspire me. We pay for you to be based here, let see you deliver the goods to show the public what it’s all about so we can continue to support your efforts, rather than treating us as a Third World Country, show your main supporters some respect USA. Lets have a UK/USAF base open day, we aren’t all Friday bum lifters you know, though it’s getting close.

    in reply to: RIAT 2009 #1173827
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Yes, I once saw on a good day a whole squadron of B1’s flying in over the Norfolk coast being intercepted by Icelandic and Lakenheath based F-15’s, I’ve seen F-117’s flying sorties from Lakenheath on a normal training day, yes I’ve seen B2’s at Mildenhall, we’ll not mention the SR-71’s and U-2’s.
    I know that the USAF never based dedicated display pilots over here but at least they used to do a few passes, it was better than nowt.
    I can probably jump in my car now, drive up to Lakenheath and happily watch about 20 F-15’s take off this afternoon, let alone all the oddities, like German Tornados.
    So why can’t they spare a few to give a couple of passes at possibly the worlds biggest military airshow, is it really that much of a problem.
    There is lot’s of variety up there, but the USAF are so paranoid about security, I doubt whether we’ll see the like again at airshows.

    in reply to: RIAT 2009 #1173845
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Really? I was at Fairford on Saturday and I saw 2 F-16s, 2 F-15s and a pair of A-10s in the static. Along with a B-1 and a B-52. Pretty good turn out I thought.

    Maybe you didn’t walk that far up.

    US flying displays have generally been pretty rare events anyway. Even in the “good old days”.

    Really, sounds like a less than average view of the general days flying at the Lakenheath enclosure or wandering around the perimeter at Mildenhall.
    My last visit:-

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/haversa10014.jpg

    Or one of the ‘rare’ flying displays in the ‘Good Old Days’.

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/File0048.jpg

    Or a few boring old statics from the ‘Good old Days’

    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/File0093.jpg
    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/File0118.jpg
    http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo101/petetruman/File0100.jpg

    Sorry, but most of my really good stuff is on slides going back to 1963 or video. I’ve never had any problem with USAF participation being lacking in the ‘Good old Days’, whatever that means, or at RIAT before. The problem is, operational requirements seems to be an excuse levelled at all military airshows these days. Isn’t Fairford a dedicated B2 base, so where were they then.
    Why don’t they admit it and say that they can’t afford to display aircraft because of the economic climate. Operational requirements, the sky over here is full of Apaches, Chinooks, et al all day long, but then according to that ‘nice’ Mr Cameron, we only have 30 helicopters in theatre, the other 300 are swanning about taking members of the Royal Family to see their girlfriends, well it’s more important isn’t it.

    in reply to: Duxford – Improving Facilities (& Kemble) #1175882
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Eeh, by gum, a sensitive issue this one.
    I arrived for the DX Spring airshow at about 8:45, there was a specific request made over the tannoy that step ladders would not be allowed and would be removed from the site, we witnessed the morons struggling with them, but by the time the flying started, they weren’t to be seen. On the other hand, if someone was sensitive enough to position one at the top of the tank bank, against the fence, not blocking anyones view and avoiding the usual pushing and shoving that you get up there, fair enough, I don’t see a problem with that.
    Legends, Saturday performance, we had a bit of running around to do to pick everyone up and we got in via the Royston entrance at about 9:15, unbelievably, by then, more or less the whole flightline was occupied with windbreaks and abandoned chairs. We actually found a spot against the fence just about as far up the Tank Bank area as possible, sat down, took it all in in the drizzle and had breakfast. So then what do you do, pack your chairs away while you have a walk round, not likely. Looking over our shoulders while the show was going on it was mayhem. Would sticking grandstands up fix this problem, I think not, it would make it worse, it’s ok providing these things on huge RAF airfields, but DX is quite small, it would make matters worse. I recall going to a DX main airshow many years ago which was sponsored by Bolt Building Supplies. They erected a grandstand probably where the USAF museum is positioned now. I was one of the lucky one’s, being a client I was able to enjoy the smoked salmon sandwiches and enjoy a place in the grandstand for nowt, I felt guilty about it though, shoving this monstrosity up in front of the normal punters was a really bad idea.
    Forget it, grandstands are a cr’p idea on such an intimate airfield, it will never work, only for the privelidged few.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 2,604 total)