dark light

Pete Truman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 2,604 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vulcan at Lowestoft #1185445
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    With half a million people in attendance, accidents were bound to happen.

    The latest I heard this morning was that 2 completely moronic teenagers phoned up the police to report a bomb on the beach during the airshow.
    They were obviously also not bright enough to realise that their mobiles could be traced and have been arrested. What a bloody stupid thing to do, it could have caused major panic amongst all those families with kids.
    If they don’t like airshows, they should be made to take part in one, tied to the back seat of a Typhoon with a sick bag tied round their obnoxious gobs and a nappy on, not for their comfort, just to keep the aircraft clean.

    in reply to: Vulcan at Lowestoft #1186093
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Looked fantastic, curse my broken ribs for not being able to go, I reckon that with the weather and apparent general euphoria, that more people may have been prepared to cough up.
    By the way, did you notice, different coloured spits on each day, the silver one looks great, makes a change from the usual blue or camo schemes.
    I’m glad to see that the BBC got in on the act eventually.

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1187032
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    There are countless treasures stashed away in palaces, offices etc – but is this RAF or IW museum (for example) policy? If, say, I had a T-rex bone of value, would I store it way or let the natural history museum at it for study and display? Is it policy with “state” museums or committee management structure or what?

    I have a piece of Stirling Mr Hacker, jolly good, lets let have 12 jaguar have it, no no says sir humphry?

    generally, do private collections trade, understand and wheel and deal more than IWM etc?

    Well they no doubt don’t have the cash and backing to wheel and deal more than the IWM, but don’t insult their knowledge and sincerety, I’ve no doubt we have some dodgy collectors, but small museums run by enthusiasts, counting every penny, are sacrosanct, thank god we have them.

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1187170
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Like I Said before, that tail section should be restored complete with rear gun turret and loaned to the Stirling group!

    Don’t forget how the Imperial War Museum refused to donate their Halifax cockpit section to Elvington in order to make their epic recreation more authentic. Wouldn’t that have been a good example of co-operation, wouldn’t it have been better as part of an impressive, complete airframe rather than sitting truncated in a museum where the public are probably more interested in the more recognisable Lanc cockpit next to it.
    Considering what Elvington have achieved against all odds, ( plus unknowingly, 2 delightful fingers up to the IWM ), anything is possible, as long as bits don’t have to be obtained from government related sources. I accept that budgets are tight, but some of the stuff stashed away would be so much of an attraction to smaller museums, they would be seen and would help the museums incomes.
    An example was a recent thread showing a look round Henlows hidden stores, what the hell was Dowdings or was it Harrises original desk doing stashed away gathering dust on a shelf, I bet TT’s museum at Sywell would give their eye teeth for that one, get these things out on show, is it so much of a problem to allow Sywell to cart that one away and let it go on show, where it deserves to be. There are so many good museums around nowadays, whether they have the capacity to take everything on board is a good question, but I would think that there is a lot of room to spread things about rather than keep them hidden from public view, possibly forever.
    If there is a sincere organisation willing to reconstruct a Stirling as Elvington did with the Halifax, everything in existance should be released to them, otherwise, it’s going to remain on a shelf unseen and unloved. Pointless.

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1187367
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    It’s interesting how much little thought has been given to preserving historic items in this country in the past, of whatever genre, and it still goes on.
    You would have thought that after the war to end all wars finished, that important icons and airframes would have been stored in one of the numerous hangars available somewhere for future generations to appreciate, but no.
    It seems to have been down to private individuals that have rescued what we have, without their support, we would have lost so much.
    The predecessor of the Eurofighter, is it the EDP, is rotting away in Loughborough University, Why? If anyone, like me was lucky enough to see this innivotive, new generation gem display, it makes you wonder why the hell it isn’t at Cosford or Yeovilton, it is a landmark aircraft, with the large number of Jags kicking around at Cosford, why hasn’t it been exchanged for one of those for instruction before it’s too late. Oh, I suppose it’s gutted remains will end up somewhere eventually, but, like the Stirling and the infinite number of important airframes lost, it should be preserved now, we are supposedly in the enlightened 21’st century.
    It was the same with steam loco’s in the late 60’s, the powers that be, representatives of the country that invented the bloody thing, kept cutting the list of possible preserved examples, back and back until bog all was left.
    It was one foresighted man, Dai Woodhams, a scrap dealer in Wales, who resisted, if it wasn’t for him, you wouldn’t be able to go for a jolly ride behind a steam loco on many of the preserved lines in Britain, in fact they wouldn’t exist except for one man’s efforts.
    My missus bought me a book about Mossies last week, I gather that even though it survived the war, the prototype was due to be burned, it was hidden away around the country by private individuals who cared, sums it up really, we shouldn’t be plumbing the depths of oceans to find historic airframes, they should have been preserved in the first place.
    What hurts me is that high profile Fred Dibnahs collection has been allowed to be vandalised and it’s future left in doubt, doesn’t give you much hope for the future of anything of historical value much does it, we care, but the majority obviously doesn’t, airframes or otherwise, as I said in the Spotted thread the other day, I was blessed with the sight of the Cat flying overhead, but could anyone be bothered to look up and give this unique sight a second look, no way.

    in reply to: Unbelievable…. #1188154
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    A lot! :diablo:

    Bloody hell Daz, I’ve just noticed the number of postings you have made, I can give you the number of a good psychiatrist, well something to pass the time until his nibs gets out of the freezer and thanks us all for remembering him, or perhaps he really did go down with that Spitfire at the end of ‘Piece of Cake’.

    in reply to: Sunderland International Airshow 2008 #1188158
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    They get allsorts of visitors at Lakenheath and Mildenhall i guess, and in flying terms, we’re only a stone’s throw away.

    Fair point on the thread-jacking, it’s been my fault both times today, made the mistake of mentioning airfix kits to Scott (the rightful owner of the thread!) and ended up unwittingly pulling in Kev_35, self-confessed anorak for a completely off-topic discussion on the difference between Airfix and Revell.

    What was the topic? oh yes, anyone off to Sunderland this weekend? lol

    Don’t worry, these things happen, you’re back on thread.

    in reply to: General Discussion #327692
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    The paying public don’t ‘have’ to listen to her constant mumblings. Go to the beer tent when she’s on. Simple!

    Paul

    What, and fight your way through the 150,000 behind you at Glastonbury, I think not, those at the front had to put up with it, no wonder some of them were p####d off with her performance.

    Heard a good one today.
    This was on the Ken Bruce show on Radio 2 this morning, he remarked on the fact that a waxwork of the ‘great lady’ had been unveiled at Madame Tussauds yesterday, (with all the fear and loathing about her at the moment, I’m not sure it was a good idea, be a junky and receive immortality?), however he said that it was the first time in his opinion that a waxwork in Tussauds looked better than the person it was supposed to represent, now that really ‘cracked’ me up.

    in reply to: Glastonbury, Amy Winehouse in Particular. #1904883
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    The paying public don’t ‘have’ to listen to her constant mumblings. Go to the beer tent when she’s on. Simple!

    Paul

    What, and fight your way through the 150,000 behind you at Glastonbury, I think not, those at the front had to put up with it, no wonder some of them were p####d off with her performance.

    Heard a good one today.
    This was on the Ken Bruce show on Radio 2 this morning, he remarked on the fact that a waxwork of the ‘great lady’ had been unveiled at Madame Tussauds yesterday, (with all the fear and loathing about her at the moment, I’m not sure it was a good idea, be a junky and receive immortality?), however he said that it was the first time in his opinion that a waxwork in Tussauds looked better than the person it was supposed to represent, now that really ‘cracked’ me up.

    in reply to: Unbelievable…. #1188313
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    I reckon he stowed away in the bomb bay of Liberty Belle and is enjoying the delights of the US. Or he could be taking the traditional ‘Suffolk Mans’ holiday in Mablethorpe and searching the dunes for ‘Life the Universe and Everything’.

    in reply to: Sunderland International Airshow 2008 #1188423
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Airfix didn’t do a Victor did they? I thought it was Matchbox that produced the Victor and when they went out of business the moulds went on to Revell?

    Regards,

    kev35

    Quite right and produced with authentic Gulf War markings as well. I was in mass model making phase about 10 years ago when my son was ‘of that age’ and we were hanging things all over his ceiling, we set up a scenario of it refuelling a Tornado and Buccaneer, I had to fabricate a refueling probe for the Bucc and do all the artwork with a 0.1 Rapidograph pen.
    The Victor was a lovely model, one of my favourite completed kits in fact, don’t worry, after 2 house moves and a son that’s now left the roost, it’s still intact in a box in the garage along with the Focke Wulfs, Spits, Zeros…………….et al.

    in reply to: Blackbird over the Falklands? #1188435
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    I should be interested to know where that fact may be verified.

    exmpa

    Quite possible, isn’t it called pride in the job. Would have been a bit embarrassing when he got shot down and captured though.
    Didn’t the French provide a bit of tactical training with Etendards and Mirages v Harriers out in the Channel, yet had technicians out in Argentina training their Etendard pilots in the use of Exocets during the war.
    Back to the Blackbirds, I thought that all the assistance came from sattelites, where would the Blackbirds have flown from, Ascension, wouldn’t anyone have noticed them parked amongst the Vics and Vulcs, no doubt more than one would have been commited to ops. Perhaps they were painted up in RAF camo and markings and no one noticed.

    in reply to: Spotted #1189410
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Cat returned to DX at about 5:15 yesterday, at the time, I was taking the dogs for a walk, this magnificent, unusual aircraft flew very low over us and I was so surprised that the hordes of the general public around at the time didn’t give it a second glance, whats wrong with people, have they no imagination or interest, I guess not, sad isn’t it, my missus agreed too.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1189438
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Where exactly is the Vulcan now.
    Is it going to appear at Lowestoft, I don’t know, I can’t get on to their website, and TVOC is 10 days out of date, they are still worrying about Farnborough sponsors, did they get any by the way, did it impress The Men trying to hang on to their money.
    I would imagine that the attendance at Lowestoft would be boosted considerably by it’s appearance, on the other hand, it’s a bit of a holiday makers show anyway, with respect, what do they know about the trials and tribulations of this aircraft. The weather forecast is good, a few more pounds in the tin might help, but I assume it all goes to the Local authority anyway, whether they are prepared to risk paying out for the Vulcs enormous fuel bill is anyones guess.

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Fury x3 at Duxford soon ? #1189578
    Pete Truman
    Participant

    Spares?

    Obviously not, I presume this is the one that had an altercation with some trees.

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 2,604 total)