dark light

DaveF68

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,578 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Strathallan Aircraft Collection #1310811
    DaveF68
    Participant

    The Mossie was still there in 1984 when I visited, but by that time the Lnacaster had been painted into Bomber Command colours.

    in reply to: London Science Museum – Aviation #1315280
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I’m not sure who ‘owns’ the P1127, it used to be in the RAF Museum.

    I have a love/hate relationship with the Science Museum Aviation Gallery – I love the subjects but hate the way they are displayed. They have some fantastic rare subjects (No-one has mentioned the Fokker EIII yet) yet the gallery is dark and dingy.

    They could improve the whole thing by painting the ceiling a lighter colour, so that you could see the aircraft hung from the ceiling – the Pteredactyl is easily missed.

    The Supermarine S6B is oftem climbed on, and last time I was there there was a kid hanging from the nose wheel leg of the P1127!

    Oh, and that Hurricane is the sole surviving (I think) fabric winged example

    in reply to: Paphos Shacks's to be destroyed?(2015 UPDATE) #1253354
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Slightly bitter feeling in that I know at least one UK Museum claimed it turned down the offer of a Shackleton when they were withdrawn in order to keep one flying.

    DaveF68
    Participant

    Excellent photos, hopefully she can go to Cosford some day.

    in reply to: Did the Allies use Captured German Aircraft? #1278945
    DaveF68
    Participant

    There were lots of evaluated aircraft in RAF markings(Bf109, Fw190, he111, Ju88 etc) and hacks, especially in North Africa (Cr42, Storch, Ju87, he111, Ju52 + others) but there were few operational use in RAF service.

    The He115s and the CANT have been mentioned, and some Storches were used in North Africa. Some former Yugoslavian Dornier 22s were used in Egypt

    Post-war, there were a lot of German transport aircraft used in Germany and Austria

    in reply to: Curtiss Seamew info #1278950
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Buttler’s Air Arsenal North America lists the intended Queen Seamew serials as JX663 – JX669, JZ771 – JZ774 and KE286 – KE304

    in reply to: What is it quiz from 'Alanl' #1288334
    DaveF68
    Participant

    CR32?

    in reply to: BBMF Lancaster Flypast this Sunday #1289040
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Will Google Earth be watching?

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1289692
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I wasn’t aware (and there’s no reason whiyI should be) that the IIIF was also designated the Firefly I. !

    It wasn’t – as 25deg mentions, the Firefly was a single seat fighter developed by Fairey as a private venture using the same Curtiss engine as the Fox. This was refused testing by the Air Ministry, ostensibly because it had a wooden airframe, but with a suspicion that some bitterness existed at the US engine in the Fox.

    Fairey redesigned the aircraft as the Firefly II around a Kestrel engine, and produced an aircraft that was remarkably similar to the Hawker Fury (if anything, even more aesthetically pleasing). This was trialled at the AAEE, and compared with the Hornet/Fury. It was faster, but not as manouverably. And it still had a wooden airframe.

    By the time Lobelle had redesigned it with a metal airframe as the IIM, the Fury had been given a production contract

    Firefly IIMs were produced for the Belgian Air Force, IIRC 25 in the Uk and about 50 in Belgium.

    A gurther re-design to produce a Naval fighter produced the IIIM – again, no production contract, but, with floats fitted, was used by the High Speed Flight Schnieder Trophy team as a trainer.

    The original is something of a favourite of mine!

    The IIIF was the result of progressive development of the original WW1 Fairey III. The Fairey Seal/Gordon were probably the untimate exprerssion of this line.

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1290513
    DaveF68
    Participant

    A 1930s Fairey design.

    The ‘2’ in TSR2 stood for Mach 2, not second version

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1290894
    DaveF68
    Participant

    There is actually quite a lot of documentation in PRO regarding this – mainly what was discarded or rejected (e.g. Thunder). No decision had been made regarding the TSR2, however the name favoured was indeed ‘Eagle’

    F-111K would have been ‘Merlin’ (Because the Merlin swings it’s wings back before it attacks!!)

    P-1154 would probably have been Harrier

    in reply to: It’s Not Just Aircraft That It Happens To! #1291797
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I’m not surprised, SMM have done nothing with her since she moved to Irvine, and she sat under water for quite a while in the ‘Garden Festival’ basin after the last time she sank.

    They should have a look at SS Great britain to see what CAN be done with determination.

    in reply to: Sea Fury VR930's starboard roundel #1297117
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Of course it could be that it IS authentic, and done deliberately……

    in reply to: The Day-Glo thread…. #1302841
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Hmm, not sure how extensive the dayglo is on this Harrier you’ve seen, but these are the only two Harriers I’ve shot with dayglo!

    Thanks Albert, the dayglo BL755s are different!

    The one I’m thinking of of was one of the early production examples that AAEE took to Canada for Cold Weather trials – had dayglo wingtips, tailplanes and (I think) nose. Can’t remember the serial, got a note of it at home.

    in reply to: The Day-Glo thread…. #1302857
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I have lodged in my memory banks a very clear sighting of a silver and daygo HS125 at Broughton circa 1964 or 65, clocked on a school factory trip when I was about 12 or 13.

    First Domine T1s were certainly silver/dayglo

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,578 total)