dark light

DaveF68

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,578 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: NA Harvard Mk.1- Do any survive? #816835
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I’d imagine they are known crash sites where there might be a few remains

    in reply to: RAF P-39 service career #817079
    DaveF68
    Participant

    And to answer Chris’ original question, the nearest comparison is probably the Swift F1/2 – February to August 1954.

    The Westland Welkin only served with the Fighter Interception Unit for 6 months

    in reply to: RAF P-39 service career #817081
    DaveF68
    Participant

    To get an interesting American view of the RAF P-38 saga, I can recommend Warren Bodie’s Lightning book – it does come across as a little Anglophobic at times, but makes some salient points. His opinion is that the prime reason the RAF wanted out the contract was the UK’s rapidly diminishing currency reserves meant we couldn’t afford it.

    in reply to: RAF P-39 service career #817633
    DaveF68
    Participant

    …taken by a different but adjacent press photographer, methinks.

    On one of the other slides I have of this photo-shoot some of the press guys are just in shot.

    See a further press photographer to the rear of aircraft ‘L’ in the b/w shot.

    Mark

    I wonder how many colour photos he actually took that day? Nice to see.

    in reply to: RAF P-39 service career #817910
    DaveF68
    Participant

    A now cleaned up colour transparency gifted to me last year.

    Interesting photo mark12, it’s quite a common shot of the 601 line up, but the first time I’ve seen a version of it in colour – taken shortly after or before.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]250588[/ATTACH]

    This one is perhaps better known

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]250587[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: RAF P-39 service career #817962
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Was the P-38 ever used on operations or was it just evaluated by the RAF though?

    .

    It’s questionable if any of the Lightning Is were ever accepted by the RAF – sources differ, with some saying that the three that eventually turned up at Boscombe were ‘borrowed’ from the USAAF. However, a couple of P-38Js were used as ‘master bombers’ later in the war (One whilst the other was converted to ‘droopsnoot’ configuration

    The Airacobra (arguably the RAF never had P-39 as that’s an USAAC designation)

    The RAF had 3 P-39Cs (DS173-175) as trials aircraft

    in reply to: Welsh P38 wreck #822663
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I do also hate that name along with some other aeroplanes that seem to of picked them up out of knowhere

    PA474 per chance?

    in reply to: Welsh P38 wreck #823384
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Indeed, no-one tell Tighar!

    in reply to: Battle Damage Repair Video Buccaneer XN983 #825937
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Possibly XN956, which was a Ground Instruction/BDRT airframe at Laarbruch

    http://www.blackburn-buccaneer.co.uk/S1_XN956_files/0_S1_XN956.html

    in reply to: Cranwell Carnage #826493
    DaveF68
    Participant

    97 IOT Flypast

    Apparently there is another video from a Cranwell graduation flypast where an F-4 is much lower.

    http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/558319-anyone-have-link-infamous-cranwell-f4-flypast-3.html#post9611204

    It’s the same flypast, it just shows the F4 from a different angle (Notice at 1.34 approx it is CLIMBING as it appears from behind the building)

    in reply to: Spitfire P9373 Data Plate #826781
    DaveF68
    Participant

    In the Squadron/Signal Publication no 39 “Spitfire in action” page 5 there is a “Flight” photograph of a 602 squadron machine with the same strip. It is noted as a flame damping strip.
    I havn’t come across many mk 1s with one. I think the early Spitfires had the forward fuel tank as the outer cowling but this was subsequently covered over with an armoured cowling that stood a bit proud of the other panels.

    M12s pic is also a 602 aircraft – possibly a local modification for night fighting? Or for attaching plates to?

    in reply to: Spitfire P9373 Data Plate #827122
    DaveF68
    Participant

    So we could have two P9373s, both claiming original provenance?

    in reply to: HMS Illustrious off to the Breaker's Yard! #827581
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I believe her last refit was more of a marking time type of thing, making sure that she WAS SEAWORTHY and could be used until she was paid off for the last time, which was why it was ‘just’ £40m. Had they had serious plans for using her beyond 2014 then they would lopped off the ramp, no need for it since there were no Harriers to be had and it was useless for anything else – but that would cost more than they would be prepared to pay, even for just a bit more deck space.

    The Invincibles had embarked other nations Harriers before (Most recently Ark Royal hosted a USMC squadron) so retaining the ski jump would have been sensible if retaining the ship.

    in reply to: FlyPast photo question #827582
    DaveF68
    Participant

    It is common for aircraft heading for scrapping to have logos ,owners details covered,perhaps the habit just stuck regardless that it was museum bound. Heres a link to the next one,kindly donated by Fedex http://gbr.orbis.org/pages/flying-eye-hospital-uk

    But the Orbis DC10 didn’t

    http://www.kvoa.com/story/33653939/flying-eye-hospital-makes-final-stop-in-southern-arizona

    Kind of strange

    in reply to: The ongoing restoration of the A1 Lightning XN728 #829469
    DaveF68
    Participant

    That’s a heading I never thought I’d see! Splendid work.

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,578 total)