dark light

DaveF68

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,578 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Harrier in Thailand #921390
    DaveF68
    Participant

    They didn’t last long in service, and the ship seemed to be used more often as a Royal yacht than an aircraft carrier.

    in reply to: Question! Why did the Vulcan have camo on its underside? #928544
    DaveF68
    Participant

    IIRC it was only the 200 series engined aircraft that had camouflaged undersides in service, which was why the ones used for Falklands raids (300 series engines) had the undersides hastily repainted in Dark Sea grey using rollers from the local B&Q!

    in reply to: Museum pieces destroyed through war #930062
    DaveF68
    Participant

    The German wikepedia site has what is purported to be a complete list of all the airframes in the musem

    in reply to: Phantom Disposal #930064
    DaveF68
    Participant

    There are already campaigns in place to claim the Black Phantom and the Lightning, and whilst i would prefer to see them stay in Scotland, that may save them.

    in reply to: Real Sea Vixens ???? #862190
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I think that’s exactly what they are – they are too small to be Vixens for one,

    in reply to: RAF Dakota Codes #862328
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Can someone explain how the RAF 4 letter codes for Dakota squadrons worked?

    Presumably the first two letters related to the Squadron but how did the “last two” relate to an individual aircraft.

    For instance the BBMF Dakota’s (a 233 Squadron aircraft) last two is “UK” (5T-UK prior to application of invasion stripes)whilst KG348 of 512 Squadron carried HC-AO. However KG437 another 233 Squadron aircraft carried 5T-B

    Thanks

    5T and HC were the Squadron codes. The other codes were the individual codes – usually this was a single letter, but on larger squadrons, or for internal administration, two codes were used. The code was that allocated to the aircraft at that time. It could change

    in reply to: The Helicopter Museum update . Addition to collection #862687
    DaveF68
    Participant

    HSS-1?

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Images #868342
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Wow!

    What the hell’s the big aircraft in the background, though?

    The one in the second photo is an Armstrong Whitworth Ensign

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]229843[/ATTACH]

    The one in the first is a Bristol Bombay

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]229844[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: 601 Squadron P-39 Door relic?? #868789
    DaveF68
    Participant

    I suspect not an ex-601 aircraft, because they were re-painted in Grey and Green, but certainly one of the P-39s ordered for the RAF but then supplied to the Russians

    in reply to: Seafire SX336 #869223
    DaveF68
    Participant

    No, cancelled due to weather. Sea Vixen scrubbed too.

    Sea Vixen had an engine problem. Pity about both Fury and Seafire, but weather was pretty dreadful.

    I’m sure in the past they shipped the Swordfish to Leuchars by road to save on airframe hours.

    in reply to: No more recoveries Lake Michigan? :( #881570
    DaveF68
    Participant

    It maybe because it is written in ‘officialese’, but there is a tone of admonishment in that memo!

    in reply to: Can anyone identify this Spitfire (in India)? #893471
    DaveF68
    Participant

    You would hope so given that is Mark12 in the picture!

    Jon

    I suspected that was him, but having never met him, wasn’t certain.

    Thaks for the answers, Google has filled the gaps.

    in reply to: Black aircrew in RAF Bomber Command WW2 #899815
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Not just Bomber Command, but there were black aircrew in the other commands as well

    in reply to: Big Engine Wellesleys #902873
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Yep. Aeromilitaria. Probably early 1980s Graham.

    Could this be it?

    Vickers Wellesley. L2645, 47 Sqn, ‘B’. Burg-el-Arab in Apr1942 Photo.bw 1942 1986 3 64

    Or

    Vickers Wellesley. L2657, reduced to 4712M Photo.bw 1942 1988 1 24

    http://www.air-britain.com/aeromil_index.pdf

    in reply to: FW200 Restoration Progress #903067
    DaveF68
    Participant

    Couple of questions:

    – Are there any photos or videos of the recovery out there? I have only ever seen one still pic of the airframe hanging precariously from the crane as it starts to disintegrate.

    – Does anyone know what mark of Fw-200 it was originally? (EDIT Google confirmed it’s apparently a C-3 originally)

    I notice it seems they intend to restore her as an Airliner, IIRC there were a few structural differences between the airline ‘A/B’ and the military ‘C’ (Canted out engines on the latter for example)

    This was the fuselage after recovery:

    http://axis.classicwings.com/Luftwaffe/fockewulf/images/fw200_1.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 1,578 total)