After what happened to the Hermes, it doesn’t surprise me
It didn’t seem to hinder the RAFM expedition.
When I read the lengths the USA goes to recover their missing from Vietnam, Cambodia etc I despair of our MOD.
mmitch.
I mean the lack of any official announcement regarding the recovery operation and the ultimate destination of the aircraft.
BAE have had it on display for a long time now -without their intervention its very likely that the majority of these machines would have been scrapped in Saudi -however the majority were essentially gifted to preservation groups after a period of storage .
They were hoping to sell them to Austria, rather than bringing them home for preservation!
but to what end?
I suspect due to the current instability of the political situation in Egypt.
Can somebody explain to me why there seems to be an continuing embargo on free discussion about the proposed final destination of the airframe when this appears to have been openly discussed elsewhere for a number of months now?
That is slightly disquieting that the fate of Sgt Copping and the ultimate destination of the a/c is being openly advertised and discussed over the pond, yet there is an official black-out here. I suspect the cold hand of politics is involved.
Nope, just that it appeared in the ‘Problem Pictures’ section. It may be one I have set aside, I’ll have a dig tomorrow and if I find it email it or pass it on Facebook
Dave F(leming)
Somewhere I have a pic in an old Aviation News which might be one of the Indian ones – will have look!
The divers photo looks pretty convincing to me.
No doubts about it, just the sonar image linked to above has been used as lots of things!
Some nice sonar images here:
Is that not the PB4Y wreck whose sidescan sonar image has been claimed to show everything from a Sunderland to a Stirling, from Windermere to Norway?
Interesting, never heard of an Avenger fitted with Highball – Vickers did fit a set to an A-26
Tony,
Not just more useful but more DFCs awarded to Chinook pilots than anyone else the last 20 years, and truly the symbol of the UK’s involvement in Afghanistan. It’s now an iconic aircraft.
5 won by pilots of ‘718 alone if I recall, if you stretch it to include the Falklands
F3 didn’t carry ALARM, it was used by the GR fleet.
It was a mod in the early 2000s proposing a SEAD role for the F3 fleet – a few aircraft were modified but the plan was not continued (F3 community will say the GR mafia killed it!)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DuXi40TWxNs/T7pis0tGQSI/AAAAAAAAA2Y/8turvmkbLR4/s1600/Tornado+F3+ALARM.jpg
Holyyyyyy *insert inanimate object here*
One can only imagine the hassle of keeping that lot dust-free 😉
amazing! I don’t know if I’d have the will power to do THAT many especially in that small fiddly scale, kudos! I wonder if he built them like a production line
Raul and his son Santiago post on this forum – he has a fantastic collection of British WW2 aircraft, and he has some nice glass fronted shelves!
Having considered this several times in the past, it’s a grand project! There is often a lot of differences within marks, so the mk I and II could have machine gun (a) or (b) cannon wings
You also have the Recce Spits, which started as variants of the mk I (Type A, B, C , D, G etc) but also later had the mk IV designation applied.
There was also a mk IX floatplane
And don’t forget the two seaters!
A couple of comments on your points:
SPITFIRE VII added a retractable tail-wheel. Many had a pointed tail-fin The new Merlin introduced two equal sized radiators
And a longer nose
SPITFIRE IX The IX came in versions for low altitude combat with clipped wings and for high altitude with extended wing-tips as well as the mass-produced normal fighter version
You also had high/low back aircraft and aircraft with blunt and pointed fins.
SPITFIRE XVI Teardrop cockpit canopies or extended wings. A four bladed airscrew was fitted
Early XVIs had high backed fuselages
SPITFIRE 22. Mk 21 with teardrop hood and cut back rear fuselage
SPITFIRE 24 24 had the big “Spiteful” tail
I’m pretty sure both the 23 and 24 had the big fin – main difference between the two was the cannon barrel lengths and teh size of the prop IIRC
SEAFIRE XV retracting tailwheel and larger tail of the Spitfire VIII It had folding wings The XV could carry a 500lb bomb
SEAFIRE XVII or MK17. The XVII was very similar to the XV
The 17 had the teardrop canopy and low back.
I can recommend the following site:
Nice to read of the part that exchanging TB382 played in getting her airborne. I look forward to the day when both can hopefully fly together.