Cees,
Question: how “original” do you think MJ271 is? Remember this particular aircraft did not go on display inside the Aviodrome (or Aviodome for that part) directly after it’s last flight in service with the air force. It first went to a small museum in Delfzijl, apparently losing such parts as the rudder, elevator, tailwheel, canopy and prop. As the aircraft was displayed outside and close to the sea corrosion took it’s toll. It would appear that the aircraft got a fair share of fresh metal during it’s subsequent restoration and a load of “new” parts to replace missing parts.
I agree that this machine is a nice example of a Spitfire but in my opinion not in the same class as for instance the P-38 at NASM or the Corsair in Yeovilton.
Again, I’m sorry to see it leave (for the time being at last) but look forward to seeing a Firefly emerge from restoration and seeing the proceeds being used to restore other aircraft in the Aviodrome collection.
Harm-Jan
Harm-Jan,
The fuselage and wings are mostly original. The wingspars are corroded ruling out a flying restoration (at the time, before the warbird industry came into play) according to Harry van der Meer. Apart from that a large amount of parts were sourced within Holland including a seat which someone had stored under his bed or so the story goes, elevators etc. So a lot of original Dutch provenance.
Sticking to subject, I would like to see a restored Firefly as well, but why this one as there are several others (including a twoseater, a version which was flown in Holland as well) available in much more complete condition and easier to restore. If change of policy by the Aviodreamers means that they will concentrate on civil aviation, then where does the Firefly fit in. Nothing wrong with their policy but it is full of holes. Then again it’s their policy and as visitors we have to accept it or stay away. Whichever we choose (entry € 12,50). This is not a onesided story, which makes it very interesting.
Cees
Sign In
