Just ran both the Cat pics through PSP and tried automatic colour balance and remove colour cast.
Interesting.
The slides look false, that blue sky looks too good to be true, and a little dark.
The prints look more accurate for the aircraft colours and marking, but with a muddy effect on the sky.
Since 1981 or thereabouts, all my pics have been taken with an Olympus OM-2N and a Sigma 75/250 zoom, sometimes with a Vivitar 2x convertor. I changed to prints around the same time. I’ve noticed over the last few years that I’ve been getting less contrasty prints and a muddy sky. I wonder if it’s mass processing that’s changed over time.
I’m now collecting genuine Zuiko lenses for Olympus and will try next year with a 200mm f:4 and a matched convertor. I might try running some slides through in a spare body to directly compare the results.
OK, LesB and philglt, why the difference in colours in nominally identical shots?
I think that’s showing off, Steve. 🙂
I wouldn’t have been able to identify the aircraft, let alone the mark number!
My memory of a Flypast (or Aeroplane) article was that most of the Fireflies were removed by a Canadian person/organisation.
Has anybody ever done a multi-year index for Flypast? That would be worth a few quid for easy reference.
Only managed three-ish airshows this year. The “ish” was Breighton where the crosswind was so high nothing flew so it doesn’t really count.
Unfortunately, the other two were Coventry on Saturday and Legends on Saturday. It’s not been a good year.
It was great see the Sea Vixen but I think it has to be the Spitfire tailchase at Legends. It may be considered heinous, but sitting in the Flypast enclosure with the sound bouncing off the AAM behind us, I loved the sound of the Griffon Spitfires, they sounded so much meaner than the Merlins. I don’t profess to be able to tell the difference if I just hear one or the other but then and there it was obvious.
Originally posted by Flat 12×2
I thought it was 18 cyl.(6 per side) 36 pistons & 3 cranks
I stand corrected, shows how wrong you can be for so long.
That’s even sillier.
Dropping railway engines on kids, what a wonderful idea.
Guess who can’t stand kids.
Edit.
Prowling through Google just discovered there was a 9 cylinder version (and a 24 with four crankshafts!) so I wasn’t totally wrong.
It was a fascinating, if very silly, engine. Who would come up with a design involving 9 cylinders, 18 pistons, 3 crankshafts and a supercharger?
I’m reputed to be good at lateral thinking but the mind boggles at how he came up with that.
Cue Spiny Norman.
Cue Spiny Norman.
Wassa flight lab?
The kids show and idiot presenters were in the middle of the aviation gallery. We had planned to be at the museum virtually all day but we were in a pub in Covent Garden by 2:30 so it’s not all bad.
Although I dislike aeroplanes being hung up, I’m prepared to make an exception for the Science Museum, although not for bolted to a wall. They have very little room, some extremely important/significant airframes and they couldn’t be pushed outside anyway. I think I’d actually prefer the S6b to be hung up out of harms way than accessible to be mauled by all and sundry.
Flood mentioned the train collection. I’m not interested in trains or railways, I’m interested in steam locomotives (and Deltics – what was the engine designer on?) and was looking forward to seeing Caerphilly Castle and various other bits I’d heard about. Railway section seemed now to be the size of a reasonable garage.
As I said, disappointing.
Went to the Natural History musem with a school trip thousands of years ago. Hated it, I’m not interested but I think I would have remembered a hanging whale. There was a Blue Whale but it just sort of laid there.
Hapy Easter
Hapy Easter
New DB601s?
No, it was a Saturday (admittedly) around the beginning of March.
I had wonderful memories of last time I went, aged I would guess around 15 or 16. It was a real Aladdin’s cave then, crammed full with something fascinating around every corner.
A real disappointment.