dark light

FMK.6JOHN

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A1 Lightning – Balderton #1127972
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I was thinking of the far more obvious cannons mounted in the top of the nose to mark it out from the ‘latter shape’ Lightnings.!

    Not quite one of a kind, there is XN726s cockpit at Boscombe and a couple of others kicking about – but definately scarce

    And the cannons in the lower nose that were skinned over:rolleyes:, sorry! rivet counter head on:D.

    XN726 is not available for public inspection and IIRC is stripped out after having spent some time on the ranges being used as target practice:mad:, not sure what the other one is like in Scotland but she is certainly in very good nick all be it painted up wrong.

    So like I said, IF she was restored to ‘in service’ condition she certainly would be a ‘unique’ exhibit;).

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: A1 Lightning – Balderton #1127982
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Why would it cost 5K to get it out of there?? A crane at the most for a day would be 1K and a lorry/low loader would be £800 -bearing it mind it’s cut inboard of the wheels and there doesn’t appear to be much holding it together it doesn’t seem that difficult a job!

    I would advocate that if someone especuially wanted a F.2A it’s restorable even if an ex Saudi cockpit was used for spare parts.

    OK, I will go with the that then, conservativly speaking £1800, not far off the fuselage that is on e-bay right now and hasn’t sold at it’s asking price of £2.5k.

    You could of course scrap the fuselage when your done stripping it……..which would mean another hi-ab low loader @ £800 to get it to the scrapyard and as mentioned before by MJR the value would be around £100 per tonne, at best the fuselage after stripping would be around 3 tonne = £300 scrap value.

    We can see were this is going now:D, £1800 to get it to the yard and strip then another £800 to get it to the scrapper, minus the scrap value (£300) that leaves you with two scrap engines, a skip full of pipes and bits, two inter pipes and two jet pipes and hopefully a good cockpit project all for around £2300.

    Oh hang on though that doesn’t include the cost of actually buying it from the current owner, that will be the problem as he may only ask scrap value or if he has his head in the clouds it could be anywhere between 10-20K.

    So basically what I am thinking here (and it has been said before), all is possible with this airframe BUT you are going to need VERY deep pockets:(.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: A1 Lightning – Balderton #1127994
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I agree David, but isn’t the most relevant part of this aircraft’s history the state it now unfortunately finds itself in?

    Playing devil’s advocate, I don’t see an F.2A Lightning cockpit being much different from any other single seater Lightning, so I am struggling to see the point of restoring this one from it’s current state, when it might be easier to restore a Saudi Lightning cockpit, and change the stickers on the side! :diablo:

    I think it would be more relevant leaving as-is…

    The F.2A cockpit was a completely different beast from all the others, it had a partial OR946 fit and IFIS system, the gunsight was different and most of the panels were quite different, it would, if restored to origional spec, make for a very unique exhibit and would certainly be ‘one of a kind’.

    Saudi tubs are ALMOST identical to the F.6, IIRC the gunsight has a subtle change to it to for the LABS system (Saudi birds had 1000lb bombs) and the weapons panel is different, there is quite a bit of other stuff that is different but we are counting rivets now:D.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: A1 Lightning – Balderton #1128258
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    So we are in agreement that (a) she won’t be scrapped but will instead end up on a farm (both barrels). That (b) the cockpit section becomes the pride and joy of one enthusiast, while (c)) others pick the bones of useful parts, while (d) the fin is restored and displayed at Newark. I would imagine that income generated from sending the rest to a farm would pay for moving expenses.

    All we need is to convince the owners that the best thing was to part with her for a nominal fee or get the local council to intervene.

    Questions: who are the owners and which county [council] does the aircraft reside in?

    Sorry but I am not sure what you mean by ‘ending up on the farm’?, could you clarify this for me so I don’t jump to any unnecessary conclusions:).

    As for paying for moving expenses, IMHO unless you are the proud owner of a hi-ab low loader then you won’t be seeing much change from 5k to get her out of there, compare that cost to the Lightning fuselage on e-bay that still hasn’t sold for 2.5K then your going to need (as has been said before) very deep pockets.

    Even just the removal of the tub is going to be difficult (not impossible), again a hi-ab low loader and at least a days work with a still saw and the know how so that no further damage is done, all starting to get very expensive…….but again not pointless and deffinatly not impossible.

    One thing has to be said though…….we have all talked enough about this bird and hopefully we are all (by now!) realising that things can be done, there are in this case only one hurdle to overcome……the current owner………as has been said before, go and see them, make contact, write, e-mail them, try and find out what the plans for her are and if she is for sale, if you don’t ask you don’t get!:D.

    Oh and yes I have tried, been there several times to try myself, the only contact I have so far managed to make was with two ruddy great rotweillers on sentry duty!!!!!.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: A1 Lightning – Balderton #1128560
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Air Turbine Gear Box………

    It is a unit that takes bleed air off the engines to provide electrical power to the aircraft, it is about the size of an old mini engine and has a clever ‘gearbox’ that allows the genorator to run at a constant speed even though the engines don’t.

    A very complicated piece of kit and an utter b*tch to remove if it went wrong, both inter pipes and jet pipes out, lots of rigging gear, scraped knuckles and swearing!!.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Lightning Twilight Rolling Thunder Run Nov 28th #1128564
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Pistonhead,

    There will only be XR728 running on Saturday, the gates open at 2pm and you will be allowed unrivaled access the the Q-shed and airframes while they get ready for the run.

    The timing of the run will be purely down to them and can be ‘dynamic’, in other words when they are ready:D, by the time the run has finished and the aircraft is returned back to the hanger it will be totally dark, the guys will light up the aircraft with spot light so that the budding photographers in us all can get some nostalgic after dark shots.

    There will hopefully be a stall set up by the LPG to sell there merchandise which is great, there may be a refreshments stand but not sure about that.

    I have been tot the two previous ‘twilight’ do’s and can highly recommend them, oh and don’t forget ear plugs!!;).

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: A1 Lightning – Balderton #1128680
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Yes all the damage does look strange, especially that trestle that has gone right through the belly tank.

    Pagen,

    The frame under the tank was placed there to support the fuselage, this was due to the fact that the wings were cut inboard of the main gear legs and the wings no longer had structural integrity.

    This means that the whole weight of the fully loaded fuselage was balanced on the frame, once the canopy and radar were removed the CofG moved aft and tipped her up on her tail.

    All of the fuselage weight now bore down on one cross member of the frame resulting in it cutting into the ventral tank.

    My feelings on this particular airframe are the same as MJR’s, the fuselage can still yield some part but only if you had the time and patients to strip her piece by piece to get to them.

    The cockpit is salvageable and would certainly make a very good project for someone.

    As MJR says cut/scrap the wings, remove cockpit for project and road the fuselage to whomever for stripping of any parts and eventual scrapping.

    The one thing I would like to see ‘preserved’ is the tail fin, removed as she is and donated to Newark Air Museum and mounted as a monument to her as she now has a legacy that will live on no matter what happens to her.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: suspicious photo #1129215
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Nash,

    I have been a resident of a modelling website for several years now and there is no one I feel who would dare try and model a downed aircraft with a body in it.

    There are tallented people out there who could do a diorama like this but I really find it difficult to believe that this could be a dio, it simply is just a photo of a downed 109.

    The only thing that does throw me is that the body does not appear to be wearing a uniform as such, it could simply be a friend of the photographer sat in the seat with his head tilted back looking into the sky just as the shot was taken.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: suspicious photo #1129221
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Strikes me as odd that there is clearly a body in the cockpit, something which any self respecting modeller would not do.

    Surely it is not compliant with e-bay rules either?.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Ejections… and the consequences. #1140396
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Jon,

    Wouldn’t it be height and not forward speed that is required to fill the chute?, IIRC the forward speed was so that the canopy would be blown clear of the aircraft by the wind (most canopies were not ejected but merely pushed open and then the wind speed would do the rest).

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Ejections… and the consequences. #1140517
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Re Craig Penrice ejection, IIRC prior to the Hunter ejection and whilst he was in the RAF made a supersonic ejection from Lightning XS921.

    It took him nearly a year to return to flying status after having lots of metalwork fitted to bolt him back together, the list of injuries on this occasion would put any sane man off flying ever again!.

    http://www.ejectorseats.co.uk/Lightningf6_1.html

    Although he would have been passed off as fit to fly there would be no doubt that his previous injuries would not have helped when he ejected from the Hunter.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Lightning Twilight Rolling Thunder Run Nov 28th #1142005
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Got my ticket, been looking forward to this one for a while, highly recommended experience!!.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Indoor Aeroboot Table Top Sale – November 7th, 2009 #1152721
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I will be there bright and early! even going to bring the little darlings with me:eek:.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: NAM night photoshoot. #468486
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Kieth,

    It’s really nice to get a complement from you, you’re photography inspires me, thankyou for your kind words, all good practice ready for the Twilight event at Brunty.

    TO23,

    Had 52 ‘passengers’ through 594, not my record but a productive and enjoyable day thats for sure.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1162291
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,188 total)