This being only a matter of three months away it would be fair to assume that at the very least XP693 will be undergoing taxi trials and shakedown tests in preparation for first flight.
I have tooled around thier web site but the information is not there, unless someone knows otherwise then she could have actually made her first flight allready.
Regards,
John.
I heard somwhere that the cockpit collection would be moving to the city of Norwich Aviation Museum.
A new building will be purpose built for the housing of these sections, 2 x Lightning, Bucc, Jag, Phantom, Shack and others.
Anyone add any weight to this rumour?
Regards,
John.
Damn and blast……….cought the last five mins.
Will it be repeated and when?
Regards
John.
Poor old outside edge running to keep up with the center marker that is virtually stood still!!!!.
Trolly Aux
If the speed stays constant then Moggy would have to run around the 20ft circle to keep up with someone walking the 10ft circle…….it’s simple physics versus Newtons law of relativity.
Another fine example of this is the 400m sprint at the Olympics, The runners are lined up on a ‘staggard start’ around the bend and yet after running at the same speed they end up more or less ‘line abreast’ when they get on the straight.
Regards
John.
Last year……..two in car
This year………car full and trying to find ways of fixing seats to the roof rack!!!!!.
Would like to meet fellow forumites and put faces to names.
Regards,
John.
The Mk.IV variant had a crew of 3, and used the 995 hp Bristol Mercury XV radial engine. These engines gave it a maximum speed of 266 mph (428 km/h), a ceiling of 27,280 ft (8300 m) and a range of 1,215 mi (1810 km). The ground attack version mounted 5 machine guns and could also carry 1,325 lbs of bombs. It had the standard single machine gun in the port wing, a pair of rear firing 0.303 machine guns in a chin blister and a pair of machine guns in the rear turret. The Mk.IVF (fighter/attack plane) carried six 0.303 machine guns, four in a belly pack, 1 in the port wing and 1 in the rear turret. This model was also employed as a night-fighter using ground-controlled radar direction.
Regards,
John.
I had a quik google and came up with this……..
The Mk.I bomber had a crew of 3 and used the 840 hp (618 kW) Bristol Mercury VIII radial engines with single-stage supercharger. Maximum speed was 260 mph (418km/h), with a ceiling of 27,280 ft (8300m) and a range of 1,215 mi (1810 km). It was armed with two 0.303 caliber machine guns, one in the port wing outboard of the engine and 1 in the rear turret (a Vickers K gun), and could carry 1,000 lb (454 kg) of bombs of assorted sizes (4×250 lb, 2×500 lb, etc.).
Hope this explains the presence of .303 machine gun parts at your dig site.
Regards,
John.
This is the LPG site……..not coldwarjets collection but at least you can keep up to date with activities on the airfield.
http://www.photo-restorations.co.uk/lightnings/index.htm
Regards
John.
Denis……..makes sense to me, I totaly agree.
John.
Thanks chaps….I feel thoroughly enriched by superior knowledge!!!, now finished the flypastie…….onto the victory roll!!
Regards
John.
I sympathise with the way you feel but I also think that all items regardless of thier provenence require preservation.
To me I feel a rush of emotion when stood in front of a preserved Spit or Lanc but that is nothing compared to the rush of emotion when confronted with a salvaged wreck that has history of the crew perishing.
I don’t mean this is a morbid fascination of death sort of way, more of a look at what these hero’s went through to give us what we have. The impact of such artifacts far out way the queston over collecting them, these items need to be saved for future generations to understand our history.
Regards
John.
They were going west-bound so thinking about it they very well could have been coming from Humberside Airport.
I thought they might be something modern but it does look a very historic way of transporting them so this is why I thought this would be the best place to start.
My first thought was that they have been picked up from one of the main ports on the Humber Bank and are being transported to the Doncaster Airport, If this is so then one would asume that they could be ‘flat packed’ for transport and assembled on site.
Seems to me a very fragile and risky way of transporting propellors but there must be a reason for it.
Regards
John.
P.S. The in car dust buster took care of the flypastie crumbs!!.
I had the wind farm after the flypastie!!!!! 😀 😀 😀 😀