Wot no Lightning’s yet? :p .
After all they are the Daddy of all interceptors! 😮 .
i would image a lot of it will be offered on ebay?
If it does then someone should be hung by the short and curly’s and shot :diablo: .
What about the Trident at Manchester, They do not operate with the same sort of budget as Cosford and I’m sure they would not say no to a lorry load of spares.
Regards,
John.
I can’t believe what is happening, I took my Dad to Cosford earlier on this year and the first on the list was the Trident.
We stood in awe of how beautifull and clean this plane looked and we both thought that the only thing that was missing was flight crew and fuel and enough runway for just one more flight…….sentimental I know but it just looked like it was fresh from turnaround and ready to go again.
I feel a twinge of sadness for all those people that put the time and effort into looking after this airframe it was a credit to them all, I have read the other threads concerning the BA collection and their impending move to Scotland and I am totally sadenned and angry to see such a fine example being cut up.
Lets hope that it is not just scrapped needlessly and that as many spares are saved and donated to other projects that would benifit from this episode.
Right time to go and find some beer to cry into!!.
Regards
John.
Neil
Well done on the move, I am pleased to hear that it all went well and I hope that the planning permision is just as succesfull.
I look forward to seing you at Cockpitfest this year.
Regards,
John.
Morning all,
FMK.6JOHN
I’m sure my dad might have taken pictures of it, being another Immingham resident, will ask him when I see him later this week.
Cheers
Tim
Thanks Tim, Scampton not far from me so hopefully the next year will be an aviation milestone………Two new hangers at Duxford/Cosford, XH558 (fingers very crossed!), Bucc back to flight, who knows maybe the authorities will soften up and let a Lightning fly 😮 .
Regards,
John.
If anyone is still interested I have a full compliment of cockpit pics of both the Victors at Bruntingthorpe, I have close ups of each panel in turn and several of the back seaters positions too.
In total I have about a dozen on each one and if I work out how to post them I will (very big files).
I also have shots of the simulator at Elvington.
John.
The pilot should have flown his sortie while he waited for the ground crew to figure out what they wanted to do. Five hours? You would think that there must be an access panel to get at the problem part. Somehow I don’t think chopping up the canopy helps fix the latch.
If the pilot flew the sortie it would be tantemount to suicide, If there was a problem during the flight and ejection was necessary then what if the jammed canopy inhibited the ejection sequence?.
You have to ask yourself if you where sat in an experimental jet would you fly it knowing there was a problem that no one had the solution to?.
John
My frist choice would be the low after-burner pass at Farnborough 2004 by a B-1B Lancer…….ears bleeding, eyes watering, internal organs scrambled!.
Second would be the 11 ship scramble at the Last Last Lightning show at RAF Binbrook August 87, nuff said.
For shear pleasure and pride one cannot deny the unique roar of an Avro Vulcan on full chat pulling up at the end of the runway, The screaming roar of four Avon’s allways made me go weak in the underpants!!.
John.
Hmm… what’s the ejection sequence on the Raptor? Probably shooting straight through the glass without jettisoning the canopy?
The Raptor has a canopy jettison type ejection sequence so if the canopy is jammed shut and the seat is fired through it then it would probably be fatal, the rescue crews could have pulled the ’emergency canopy release’ system but this would fire explosive bolts and with a ‘jammed’ canopy this also could have injured the pilot.
I think the option chosen was the best in the circumstances and no doubt there would have been a lot of head scratching before they decided to spray all that oil and FOD into the cockpit area.
John.
I’m pretty sure I read somewhere, that it is impossible for a prop driven aircraft to go supersonic.
Something about the propeller arc creating drag after a certain speed.
Not so!!, On the 27 June 1953 Capt. John M. ‘Fitz’ Fitzpatrick took the XF-88B through the sound barrier.
The XF-88B was an experimental plane based on the F101 Voodoo and was fitted with two J34 jet engnes with afterburner for conventional flight and in the nose was fitted an Allison XT38 turboprop engine.
Due to the ‘tri motor’ configuration fuel load dictated sortie times of around twenty minutes and the propellor was only used to sustain flight once the jets had got the plane up to high subsonc speed.
That said as far as I know it is the only propellor driven aircraft that has documented evidence of breaking the sound barrier, eventually reality kicked in and everyone saw the pointlessness of the excersize and the project was abandoned and the airframe scrapped.
John.
The mantra when the F-15 was designed was “not a pound for air to ground” and even then it was only designed with 8 AAMs in mind. It had absolutley nothing to do with it carrying bombs.
Before we descend into ‘I know more than you do’ threads then we should remember we are talkng globaly of the F15 and not diferentiating the marks, yes it is true from the onset it was designed as an air superiority fighter but in the later marks and certainly the F15E it has become an outstanding multi role fighter/bomber.
Like I first stated this thread has interested me and education is the key!.
Good point, but one thing gets me thinking that the Super Hornets fit up of 12 AAM’s is an excersize in publicity, I remember watching the Super Hornet’s display at Farnborough Airshow a couple of years back with a full tactical war load (a party trick of the F18 with penalties on fuel load I’m sure).
I am under the belief that the Hornet was designed as a point defence fighter for the US Navy and therefore can carry a large amount of load without the worry of range, true it is a multi role aircraft and can be used an air-ground weapon.
Also my understanding is the F16 and F15 are used primarily as strike aircraft which carry a minimal AAM’s for self defence and LGB’s for primary targets whilst retaining range for the mission.
I am only posting this reply from what I have seen at airshows and watched on the box, I am not a book muncher and know nothing of warloads, takeoff weights and fuel loads of said aircraft, as ajunior spotter this thread has interested me and education is the name of the game!!!.
Regards
John
I totaly agree, what’s in the family stays in the family.
If you have a large collection that has taken years to grow then look in that collection and ask yourself what is really valuble to you and what can be sold without any detriment to you or your family.
I myself suffered from ‘uniersity cool’ and yes it does go out of fashion, I now have proudly hung on my wall my grandfathers bowsons pipe and a brass letter from his ship that was sunk, every day I pass these items and thank him and everyone involved in both wars.
Both these items are totaly worthless but if I was asked the value of these items then nothing would come close.
John.
Like everything in the ebay world it’s worth what someone wants to bid for it! There might be a good market though for someone to make repro’s !
Valid point, it is worth only what someone is prepared to pay for it so why has he started at such a high price?, there are such options on E-bay as reserve prices and best offers or even ‘buy it now’ Motivated by greed?.
I agree with EN380, E-bay is a good tool for collectors to find those gems that we have all been looking for, after all if all the aviation enthusiasts in the UK gave up there collections to museums then me thinks there would not be enough shelf space for even 1/4 of it all, and as genuine collectors we would cherish and look after things rather than see them hawked off for a profit or destroyed needlessly (remembering the log book previously with 11 Guy Gibson signitures and the accompanying threat to cut it up and sell individually).
Knowing that the sign has no WW2 provenance certainly make the starting price VERY uninviting.
John.
Now thats what I call talent!!!.