Well dilpakistani, wht u suggest as rational and practical is usually based on logic and reality. Logic and Reality of what happens in Pakistan i have mentioned earlier. Your concern and reservation is justified but so is mine. Nywayz nice to know Pakistan getting into Exports of Weapons.
Question
IF Pakistan went for Nuclear Cooperation with Iran, which the president already hinted if not publically accepting (A Q Khan stuff along with two new names disclosed). So considering pretty neat gadgets tht came on display during the recent excercises done by Iran, Namely the Tarpedo technology, the Multi Warhead Radar avoidance mechanism and last but not least water skipping jet. Is there a chance Pakistan got any insight on these projects as a result of Nuclear Co operation?

I think the west have proved very diplomatic in this thing. How should he behave instead? Kindly ask the Iran to stop – or at least slow down – its nuclear weapons program. Of course only if the Iran feels OK with that. Maybe offer some billions to compensate Iranian welfare programs for the money spent on Uranium enrichment instead of welfare.

And explain me y does the US of A spends so much in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan when citizens in its own boarders hit by natural disasters like Katrina badly need releif?

Well they are at this point trying to close the gap which existing between IAF and PAF. With delays with JF 17 and the time take to get all the F-16z in place, they are going for the balancing act for the near future. So spending amount in the Air Defence is a wise investment as non of the two airforces have yet gone stealth. So lets c wht future holds out for PAF.

well this thing sure is fast. A very big shift of strategy if Russia has actually handed the technology to Iran. I wonder some planners in USA must be feeling the heat of the recent display of missles done by Iran

Yes this very likely may be the case. Gals trained for AEW&C. Well they used the term combat pilots so no use in not beleiving that they may not be around in the main combat stream.

come on man, you don’t really believe Armstrong and them, plus NASA would have really sent Humans WAY out to the moon with out first testing this Technology “HUNDREDS” of times do you??, Please don’t repond back with some claim that NASA did test a remote controlled LM hundres of time we (The US Puplic just haven’t heard about it.” Excuse.

Well its a very powerful argument which indicates only two directions. One yes this all is a big setup and nothing happened all was a hoax. Second may be pride was more important to them then the life of the astronuts 🙂 and they were willing to put them online to acheive this goal.
The second argument though beleivable but also suggest that if you dont test anything you dont know if it gona fail or work, so interm meanz will be a big loss of moral if something happened like failures to the actual first effort.
Two edge sword i would suggest. What u think guys?

I would agree to the Iran strategy. Lesson learned from Iraq war is good. Go into urban street fighting mode. No need to get wacked in air. Delay and bleed the enemy by ecnomics. I guess must be busy already getting underground weapon dumps.
On the other hand i do fail to understand why any effort is not being made to acquire good air defence systems as its a worthy effort and will do play an important role if the war happens and tend to prolong. An active SAM array going active into 1 month after war will give nightmares to any air support in that location.
Comments guys?