Interesting report on the performance of the LR modified Spitfires in the attached link.
More discussion here. Mark 12…..you said the picture was from ebay….were there any others as this threads talks about a sky band on the tail?
http://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-410846.html
There is mention in this thread that P8439 as mentioned by mark12 earlier was LR modified and a presentation Spitfire, so would tie in to the original picture well.
The bulge would be in the right place for a mkII LR wing fuel tank, but difficult to be sure what it is.
http://ww2talk.com/index.php?threads/dunkirk-operation-dynamo-evacuation-beaches.25035/page-28
Interesting thread!
Take a look about half way down the link. Shows another spit with a bent prop…much more damaged, but could have happened after the original picture? Could this be an option?
Hi, any more luck in identifying this aircraft? Did I see a post which had some fragments of skin with paint on still? Thanks
I thought is was the Spitfire marks VI, VII, X and XIX which were pressurised.
If you are interested in Spitfire’s of the two seat variety, this page may be worth a look:
Hi,
copy on ebay if you are still looking:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]244499[/ATTACH]
P7350 taken last year.
Looking lovely.
One question on the undercarriage doors – as a Seafire, should the front corner be cropped off to avoid tangling the arrester wire, or was this a local mod on some aircraft? I recall that Spitfire IX EN199 in Malta has this done on it’s doors as they were restored/remanufactured from some recovered with Seafire II MB293.
Looks like BBMF XIX PM631 in DL-E markings.
Sorry to back to an old thread, but is there any news on the restoration of the PR IV? Thanks.
Hi, long shot I know, but if anyone has a spare adult and child ticket, I would be very interested! Please PM me if you have or know any. Thanks and regards, Sean
Mirage and dagger have to fly long distance to reach the place where they was fighting thus have very little fuel left to maneuver , when the Mirages arrived on target they had little fuel left. This meant they couldn’t use afterburner and very little time on target. They could not use supersonic speed to their advantage due to fuel shortage so that limited them to subsonic which is equal to the speed of the Harrier wy , Mirage and dagger were force to fly low under radar horizon to evade Roland SAM thus their advantage in speed was negated , Harrier used a much more advanced missile the Aim-9L with all-aspect ability thus allow it to engage Mirage from much longer range while Mirage used an older version of aim-9 at that time that can only be fired in tail aspect, If both planes had met on equal terms with full weapons and fuel and the Harrier dont have fire support from SAM ,the Harrier would have been hard pressed to win as the Mirage could attack and break away at will.
Doesn’t your answer prove the point that situation, pilot etc are important factors into any engagement. Going just on stats the Harrier had a 100% record, so is the ‘better’ aircraft in that situation…
P.s. Agree with Moggy..Spiteful was the best. 😉