dark light

Canuck

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1122497
    Canuck
    Participant

    A Naval Flying Flea experiment… Thirties vintage… USA, perhaps?

    in reply to: DC-3 Barrel rolling #1135760
    Canuck
    Participant

    The A-26 is a fast and maneuverable airplane. Very big difference between the DC-3. That’s the point.

    However, Douglas aircraft, generally are “over-engineered” – and the FAA statement seems to support this. Mr. Basler’s relative success would appear to bear this out, no?

    In a former life I was a program(me) manager on the wing attachment bits for both DC 10/MD-11 ‘s and similar-sized Boeing aircraft. the Douglas piece consisted of two huge Alcoa forgings Huck-bolted together with a shear plate in-between. The Boeing part was a “simple” machined Alcoa forging…

    So, for long life – my money’s on Douglas. If one has the requisite altitude & velocity , I have no problem with the idea of an aerobatic Gooney.

    As an aside, I had a Brit colleague, ex-Hatfield, who felt that G. deH should have ended up in the Old Bailey for the Comet windows.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1135768
    Canuck
    Participant

    Where’s John? :confused:

    in reply to: P38 Flight Of 5 In California #1135771
    Canuck
    Participant

    Thanks, Zulu Romeo… wonderful to see so many airworthy!

    in reply to: Plant 42 Heritage Airpark #1146011
    Canuck
    Participant

    Okay, so she appears to be RCAF 23231 – Milberry and the City of Palmdale differ in details of service…

    Listed by the California site as a NAA Sabre – but that’s typical.

    Built 3 August 1954,

    TOS 3 September, Service w/ 413 and 422 Sqn. RCAF

    SOS – 1960

    Registered N231X 1972

    Registered N91FS 1982

    Donated to Airpark – 1998

    in reply to: Plant 42 Heritage Airpark #1146017
    Canuck
    Participant

    N91FS is likely a Canadair Sabre Mk. 5 – after SOS RCAF, many Sabres were purchased by Flight Systems for drone conversion and chase plane duties.

    I’ll pore through Larry Milberry’s book to find her history, if you like?

    in reply to: What is a pre-Moratorium airframe? #1147926
    Canuck
    Participant

    You haven’t. No need for apologies.

    Moggy
    Moderator

    Amen.

    Francisco – there are a great many truly decent enthusiasts here – sometimes it takes time to sift through the Bravo Sierra, but in the end, the majority of us are here to learn more about our obsession. This thread was just FINE, in my humble opinion.

    Keep coming back!:cool:

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1157574
    Canuck
    Participant

    That IS snow in the photo, I’m guessing? πŸ˜€

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1158158
    Canuck
    Participant

    Has this one stumped the assembled experts or is it just a lack of interest?

    Not being an expert on anything, here – and certainly lacking in much GenAv knowledge – I was thinking European… perhaps Italian or French – but I couldn’t find anything that had such “crude” rectangular tail-booms. Generally, those Latin blokes tend towards the sensual curves, eh? πŸ˜€

    It looks like it has an American-style “flat-four” engine, rather than a Gypsy/Renault-type inverted inline – so it could be US, or even South American?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1089530
    Canuck
    Participant

    Next one-

    Latecoere 550? Early one? Later ones had “normal” cowlings.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1092543
    Canuck
    Participant

    No it’s the Gaullaudet Pursuit. PW.4

    John

    John, what’s the background on this one? I see it never got past the static load testing stage – but who were these Gaullaudet chaps?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1092550
    Canuck
    Participant

    I’ve resisted the temptation to post an image of another avion FranΓ§ais – so have a go with this.

    Damned time-zones! Pobjoy Niagaras… Cool! πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Amazing 1/48 Scale Halifax Model #1093551
    Canuck
    Participant

    Truly a beaut, that model… Greeks bearing gifts to us all, eh? πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Amazing 1/48 Tamiya Lancaster #1093774
    Canuck
    Participant

    I thought the mid-upper sitting on the fuselage mock-up was a Martin.

    As I recall, CWH had restored a Frazer-Nash turret, because Andy Mynarski actually flew in a British-built Lanc – and the “purists” wanted to insert it into FM213. I remember MUCH discussion over this… Messrs. Sobering, Randall & Etheridge would be the ones to say definitively (if they’re still with us?)

    In the end, CWH used a Martin for many reasons:

    a. It is the correct turret for FM213

    b. The modification costs in time & material to insert the F-N were absurd – if the aircraft was to fly that year.

    c. The Martin profile uses less fuel – a BIG consideration when running an aircraft with four thirsty Merlins.

    Now, this was about 1986… and I haven’t visited Mount Hope since 2000, when I moved to the Ottawa area – so you may indeed be correct.

    in reply to: Amazing 1/48 Tamiya Lancaster #1093904
    Canuck
    Participant

    For the undercart quibblers:

    Apologies for size… it shows the detail, however. You’ll note the angle of the dangle, herein?

    http://data3.primeportal.net/hangar/dave_kitchel/lancaster/images/lancaster_059_of_106.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 136 total)