dark light

seahawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 3,269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rear shots @EDI today #678535
    seahawk
    Participant

    nice

    in reply to: A few more Brummie shots #678545
    seahawk
    Participant

    the SAS MD is really fantastic

    in reply to: Some Manchester Inbounds #678549
    seahawk
    Participant

    Nice shots

    seahawk
    Participant

    I would bet on a FMS F-16 deal, ike Poland.

    in reply to: London Heathrow Photos — Fri 20 Aug #681097
    seahawk
    Participant

    I wish an Il-96 would have come in, but I think the one you are referring to is actually a 777-200 :p

    Yep you are right

    in reply to: Mini meet at LHR 20/8/2004 #682386
    seahawk
    Participant

    The United 777 is great

    in reply to: London Heathrow Photos 2 — Fri 20 Aug #682391
    seahawk
    Participant

    Yes, now that would be a house I would like to own.

    in reply to: London Heathrow Photos — Fri 20 Aug #682396
    seahawk
    Participant

    The IL-96 is stunning – superb

    in reply to: First results from new camera-Very Pleasing! #682405
    seahawk
    Participant

    nice shots

    in reply to: Su-35 Flanker won FAB new FX contest #2668380
    seahawk
    Participant

    You reasonong has a huge flaw if Brazil does not develop rocket launchers always needs to pay some one to launch it`s satellite but if Brazil has the Launcher the braazilian can offer their services to other nations and with that pay their own program.
    Look the case of Mexico and Brazil, Mexico spends the large amounts of money in it`s satellites but is uncapable to launch a satellite, Brazil will be able to launch it`s own satelllites at the long run Brazil can offer to Mexico to launch the Mexican satellites from alcantara that is what in the FX program the Brazilians are thinking how to achieve the best technology transfer to further the brazilian aerospace industry and the Russian offer is the best. who do you think wil make more money at the long run Mexico or Brazil? Mexico is allowing the US to launch its satellites fom US launchers making Lockheed and Boeing richer, you are saying we should follow Mexico`s example in order to keep the US industry healthy and Mexico uncapable of design any sattelite launcher or Aircraft that is the reason Mexico opted for the Russian technology transfer with the Mi-8 assembly plants

    In the long run. Mexico. They are not bound to buy launch services from the US, they can ask Russia, India, Europe, USA and Japan for those. In the end it can pick the best offer.
    Brazil however would also have to develop a launch vehicle. Such a project does only make money, if you start your own space exploration programm, which gives lots of money to the launch industry. If you want to limit space launches to your commercial needs, then you would never come out of the defict. Forgein programms are possible, but hard to come by. The competition in the launch service sector is huge already today. And if Brazil is not doing something stupid (nuclear weapons programm and tests) is has to fear no embargo. So all service providers will be available for Brazil. And with that they ca nchoose from a wide ranging line-up of launch vehicles. That gives you more freedom in satelitte design, as you do not have to optimize for one launch system.

    A national space launch programm is just good for the national pride.

    in reply to: Taiwan AFB Open House and 2004 Sports Air show! #2668396
    seahawk
    Participant

    Nice pics

    in reply to: Su-35 Flanker won FAB new FX contest #2668461
    seahawk
    Participant

    Seahawk 🙂 hello

    I feel you are saying that Latin America should rely on the big powers for satellite technology give up our own programs and let the Americans, Europeans, Indians, Russian and Chinese do the work and we paid and we continue lagging behind in high technology

    I feel and i consider that unless Latin America deveopes it`s own Telecomunications and Satellite technology , we are going to be poor nations.
    Satellite technology implies better electronics, metalurgy and the capability to supply telecommunicatios services cheaper to Latin america and third world users.
    Brazil still needs technology transfers since basicly it saves money and time, in the case of the chinese we can see it has boosted them into the third most advanced space program

    The US will say that the VLS can be modify to create an ICBM but the reality they do not want competition and you are right Brazil is free and can do the agreements she desires and the Rusaain and Chinese are good technology transfer allies and that will allow Brazil to become a nation that can design it`s own technology.

    No, I say that you should develop satelitte technolgy, but you should skip developing your own launch platform. You can always buy launch services from the cheapest bidder. I mean look at the development of current satellites. Telecommunication staelittes are becoming larger and heavier, that means you need a heavy lift launch system. The system currently under development is limited to micro / small satelittes, that are only of very limited comercial value. So it would mean to develop yet another launch platform.
    The money could be better spent on building and operating your own systems.
    I would also not limit myself to one partner nations. Cooperate which who you want, and with who you think is best for the project you need. If you limit yourself to one partner nation you will ne limited to the technology level of you partner. If you need more you would have to develop that technology with yur partner, although you might could buy it from other oranisations.

    seahawk
    Participant

    Yes, but if you facter in the lower weight of a 747ADV it come out cheaper still.

    Why so? The A380 can take more cargo and more business and first class passengers. So even if the seat per mile costs and the trip costs are lower for the B747, the revenues of the A380 are higher.

    So in case the A380 will still make more profit.

    ( I hate the A380 because I think it is taking commercial aiviation the wrong way. I have no desire to be forced to fly in a 600+ passengers cattle transport – imho the B 7e7 is the way of the furutre. Smaller airliners and more point to point operations.)

    seahawk
    Participant

    Patriot is their current system… and one they have poured a lot of money into to make it do something the Russian missiles were designed to do from the outset.

    No doubt about that Garry. But they really should compare themselves wit the newser systems. Russians SAMs are world leading, so why not saying so??

    in reply to: Su-35 Flanker won FAB new FX contest #2668653
    seahawk
    Participant

    I disagree todays space launch programms offer very little in commercial viable technology. Most launch systems are old legacy systems. The only real advantages have been made in satelite technolg. That is something which is econmocially sound and also important for a nation to develop. The launch can be made by the cheapest bidder on the world wide launch market. I mean how does Brazil want to compete with a micro satelite launcher system, when the newer and larger launch systems can take such pay loads as additional load during their regular launch or launch 4-5 of those small payloads at once.
    And we should not forget that commercial satelites are getting heavier.

    Imho Brazil should try to enter an international space programm as a partner. I think you will have no problems getting into any ESA programm, as they are looking for any money they can get.

    I can understand the russian desire to get a joint-venture with Brazil going, because Russian industry would get access to a much better situated launch pad.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 3,269 total)