dark light

seahawk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 3,269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Volkel airshow pics #1614904
    seahawk
    Participant

    and one more

    in reply to: Volkel Airshow #2685286
    seahawk
    Participant

    Nice shots Frank

    Let me add some more

    in reply to: Volkel Airshow #2685865
    seahawk
    Participant

    Yeah, very nice. I still have to finish the pics I took there. Those were the first I made ready for the web.

    in reply to: Volkel Airshow #2685875
    seahawk
    Participant

    Forgot some examples 😀

    in reply to: Volkel Airshow #2685883
    seahawk
    Participant

    Went on sunday, but left at around 14.30 as I was completely wet after some nasty rain.

    Nevertheless I got some acceptable pictures.

    in reply to: MiG 1.44 really is back from the "dead" #2686460
    seahawk
    Participant

    Doubt it. There’s not enough for both.

    Same here. But imho did not other nations sign up to finance and join the Pak-FA project ?
    Imho this talk is damaging to russian aviation industry. It is nice to announce many projects, but is even better to finish some.

    in reply to: MiG 1.44 really is back from the "dead" #2687237
    seahawk
    Participant

    So Russia might decide to finance PAK-FA and MFI ??

    in reply to: RSK MiG: work on 1.44 continue, orders on hand rise #2687240
    seahawk
    Participant

    Am I wrong, or did Russia not give the PAK-FA contract to Su ??

    AFAIK Russia is not going to finance another fighter project for the foreseeable futture.

    So who should be funding the development of the MiG project ?? Given the development costs of modern 4 or 5th generation fighters are surely to much for MiG to take on alone.

    in reply to: Good fre downloads for FS 2004 #255355
    seahawk
    Participant

    modern commercial and modern civilian

    in reply to: PAF to purchase 35 ex Libyan Mirages #2688064
    seahawk
    Participant

    A rather pointless discussion. F-16 A/B or F-16E. Does it matter ?

    First we have to ask what will the PAF use it for.

    If the answer is air defense, then a F-16 A/B brought to MLU standard with JHMCS and AIM-9X or ASRAAM would be surely enough for that role and equal or even superior to an F-16E.
    If you want to do strike then it is the E version.

    in reply to: Should the French just went with the dam F-18!? #2689215
    seahawk
    Participant

    But the others were invited to pay the development and bring down unit costs 😀

    in reply to: RSK MiG: work on 1.44 continue, orders on hand rise #2689267
    seahawk
    Participant

    Soory, but I doubt that they have the resources (money) to delevop a 5th generation fighter of their own. That is impossible. Perhaps they can continue studying the design, but that is it.

    in reply to: That's a good idea ! #431287
    seahawk
    Participant

    Yep, excellent idea

    in reply to: Restructuring the superpower #2690029
    seahawk
    Participant

    Long overdue move. I will miss the equipment from an aviation fan view, but I can only recommend to the US, to get out their forces from Germany.

    Too many restrictions, too expensive and you have always ask the germans to use the bases in a conflict. I would either keep the military part of Frankfurt or keep Ramstein as an logistics base.

    What are the strikers supposed to do in Germany. Drive on the autobahn ??

    in reply to: Commercial Avitation Forum Concerns #679943
    seahawk
    Participant

    I find this forum pretty fine

Viewing 15 posts - 2,416 through 2,430 (of 3,269 total)