dark light

jbritchford

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 1,693 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: South Korean AF retaliates after Norks shell S.Korean town #2355005
    jbritchford
    Participant

    There is nothing in NOK inventory that can counter the F 15K Slam Eagles

    So nuclear weapons and missiles with enough range to hit anything at least as far as Tokyo, to say nothing of artillery trained on Seoul, do not constitute a real, dangerous response?

    Would you take such a Cavalier attitude if millions or your own countrymen’s lives were directly threatened?

    in reply to: South Korean AF retaliates after Norks shell S.Korean town #2355534
    jbritchford
    Participant

    News reports this morning are that China would be willing to see reunification on SKs terms, abandoning their ‘ally’ in return for a phased withdrawal of US forces.

    Another interesting story:
    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2010/11/jstars-goes-to-korea.html

    J-Stars deployment on the peninsula. Any confirmation?

    in reply to: Fighters that never flew ! your own list #2356044
    jbritchford
    Participant

    I actually quite like the look of the swing-wing lightning! 😀 It looks mean and battle ready!

    But methinks that all the extra weight would give it even shorter range than the conventional version, were there plans to give it enlarged fuel tanks or did the design not get that far?

    in reply to: Oh dear god! Invincible for scap! #2019272
    jbritchford
    Participant

    It would be nice if it could be saved, but imagine the costs associated with it. That said, she would make a nice partner for HMS Belfast 🙂

    in reply to: F-4 vs F-104 #2356750
    jbritchford
    Participant

    safety, twin engine reliability, bigger payload, more diverse mission profile?

    how about F-8 vs MiG-21BIS?

    I think the problem when comparing aircraft like this is failing to see them in their wider context. In a WarPac vs NATO conflict they would be unlikely to see any 1v1 combat, they would be acting as part of huge national and international air defense systems.

    Some of the Soviet equipment was, one on one, less technically capable than it’s NATO counterparts. But failing to see it was part of the wider Soviet war machine and you miss the point straight from the off.

    Sorry if that sounded like a rant, it’s a subject close to my heart ;):D

    in reply to: So we probably all know about JetMan… #417208
    jbritchford
    Participant

    make an aircraft with a pilot flying prone, and enclosed within the aircraft.

    A matter of comfort on the part of the pilot; can you imagine how painful his neck would be laying prone for hours with his head up to look where he is flying? 😉

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2359254
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Well, they are not that cheap to buy and to run. Plus the major thread has quite a bit knowledge about the Sukhoi.

    I found some sources that quoted around $30m for an Su-30MKI, but others as high as $70. Which is the more accurate figure?

    Either way, I still think Brahmos is the way to go in terms of anti-shipping missile, even if it is land based launchers.

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2359392
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Rather surprised that nobody has suggested the Su-30MKI/Brahmos combination for air sovereignty/anti-shipping defense.

    in reply to: Atlantiques for RAF? #2361907
    jbritchford
    Participant

    King Air 350 is a bit small for an MPA, as well as only being a twin engined aircraft.

    As for replacing the Lightning II, get back to me when you can fly a King Air off a carrier with a useful load 😎

    in reply to: Tornado Replacement and the F35C- at last some sense! #2365478
    jbritchford
    Participant

    well i think obsolete is an overstatement, it may not be as advanced as typhoon but its certainly not obsolete:diablo:

    also the uk is building a significant portion of the F35, so would be folly to dump all of that and buy Rafale.

    In terms of workshare it wouldn’t make much of a difference. BAE would get to build their share of all F-35s regardless of any order or not from the UK govt.

    in reply to: US wants F-22 fighter successor ideas #2365849
    jbritchford
    Participant

    What exactly are the F-22’s obvious short comings in sensor fusion?

    IIRC its datalink capabilities do not compare well with the F-35, the F-22 can’t share its radar data with other friendly assets. Other than the pilot getting on the radio that is.

    in reply to: Il-76 – Any future potential? #2381935
    jbritchford
    Participant
    in reply to: Il-76 – Any future potential? #2381944
    jbritchford
    Participant

    As for the engines, some looking around reveals that a new commercial variant, the Il-76TD-90VD, fitted with PS-90A-76 engines, is compliant with ICAO noise regulations:

    http://www.volga-dnepr.com/eng/group/projects/l76_modern/

    Volga-Denpr airlines has a few on order and sees a world market for 30-50 aircraft:

    http://www.eft.com/content/third-new-generation-il-76td-90vd-freighter-joins-volga-dnepr-fleet

    in reply to: Joint Future Theater Lift Study — C-130 replacement #2381973
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Have either the C-235 (HC-144) or the C-27J been considered to augment the C-2 Greyhound? Both are already in US service, and would give more room for error than the Hercules.

    in reply to: Nimrod on the way? #2382315
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Could a nimrod render assistance other than locating the ship?

    Can it drop inflatable life rafts or anything :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 1,693 total)