dark light

jbritchford

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,693 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Successful launch for Jules Verne ATV #1913676
    jbritchford
    Participant

    By builidng both this and the Columbus module for the ISS, ESA probable has the know-how to create a manned module based on the Jules Verne?

    I suppose it would need a re-design for re-entry systems, but the principles are in place at least

    in reply to: CVF #2086706
    jbritchford
    Participant

    During the 1970s the RN did exercises with the USN and found that a huge air wing isn’t all that necessary to remain effective in combat, the RN ‘sunk’ US carriers as often as the was able to sink the RN.

    Even if you have a big air wing there is still a limit to what you can have in the air at any one time, given flight times and deck space. I’ll admit its still better to have a large aircraft reserve, just not completely necessary.

    in reply to: Last F-4 operators #2488740
    jbritchford
    Participant

    USAF only uses the QF-4 target drone, which will be replaced by the QF-16 soon.

    Germany is phasing the Phantom out now in favour of the Typhoon.
    Japan and South Korea are selecting replacements for their F-4s at the moment.
    The Turks got Israel to upgrade their phantoms, so they should be alright for a few years.

    Thats all I know really, hope it helps

    in reply to: General Discussion #345395
    jbritchford
    Participant

    There’s only enough metal left from the Canon to make about another 50 anyway.

    Once this has run out, why not melt down the barrel of one of the artillery pieces captured during the falklands conflict, or an ex-german ww2 gun?

    in reply to: Should Germany Bring Back the Iron Cross? #1913795
    jbritchford
    Participant

    There’s only enough metal left from the Canon to make about another 50 anyway.

    Once this has run out, why not melt down the barrel of one of the artillery pieces captured during the falklands conflict, or an ex-german ww2 gun?

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2490104
    jbritchford
    Participant

    .

    But then again you armchair folks seem to know more about what goes on in DC then I do right.

    Did anyone claim this? We simply pointed out that the trade in military technologies between Europe and the USA is a two-way street, with many, many US military items of equipment or technologies coming from overseas.

    Protecting one’s home industries and jobs is justifiable and reasonable, to an extent. But to bury one’s head in the sand and ignore all foreign technologies is isolationist and dangerous. At the end of the day it would mean the US military being forced to make do with lower quality equipment

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2490290
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Don’t forget the M240 and the M249, VH-71, the C-27J…. the list is endless.

    Actually, BAe systems owns the firms that make Bradleys now, so are they still “American” enough for you? :diablo:

    in reply to: Odd French Transall Sighting… #2490733
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Thanks for pointing that out, Arthur.

    in reply to: Odd French Transall Sighting… #2490763
    jbritchford
    Participant

    So I’m on my way to Valley for day watching Hawks. The train from Chester to Rhosneigr goes past the Airbus plant at Broughton, so as usual I keep my eyes peeled for anything interesting beyond the resident Mig and Sukhoi’s…

    Anyway, this morning I couldn’t help but notice a French Air Force Transall sitting on the flightline, props running… Does anyone have any idea what it was doing there…?

    Zeb

    Ps… Valley really was just Hawks, only interesting visitor was an Indian one, just as I was leaving… ******…

    MiGs? Sukhois? Am I missing something or is this merely jest? :confused::D

    in reply to: CVF #2088004
    jbritchford
    Participant

    The steel has been ordered, finally we are getting close to the first metal being cut! 🙂

    http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/EquipmentAndLogistics/80000TonnesOfSteelOrderedForNewAircraftCarriers.htm

    At the bottom of this website it suggests that the capacity is only 40 aircraft, which seems a bit low?

    in reply to: future falklands deployments #2491693
    jbritchford
    Participant

    I’ve sat back until this point, but here I go.

    In the event of another falklands, I don’t think anyone could justifiably complain that the UK strike targets in Argentina such as military bases/command centres/communications. Civilian targets, or others that are judged to be too high a risk to the populace should be out of bounds, period.

    Iraq has nothing to do with this discussion on proportionality. Afghanistan certainly does, and for the record I think that the coalition has been justified in its actions there.

    in reply to: USAF buys Airbus tankers? #2492062
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Very old news, qwerty; move this one mods….

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493688
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Yep, the Pentagon briefing just confirmed it’s the KC-30! Looks like the Malaysian Sun got a scoop there.

    Wel, they had a 50/50 chance of getting it didn’t they!;)

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493797
    jbritchford
    Participant

    I would be surprised if WSJ has gotten something this big wrong.

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2493859
    jbritchford
    Participant

    Still no answer!!!!!! Why must they torture us so? :p

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,693 total)