Seems a bit odd serving Liverpool and Manchester, I would have thought Birmingham would have been next.
Keith, you fairly get about!
ZJJ just needs the metal polished.
Thanks – as usual – for taking the time to post ’em up.
There is no better looking biz jet than the Global Express in my book!
I have to agree, but in this case the photographer has made the Gulfstream look good too! 😀
MSR777, this (link to JetPhotos.Net) come immediately to mind.
Isn’t there a mod involving drop down masks? to take the aircraft up to FL280/300? Whether it is practical to take the Q400 up that high is another question. Deano?
The reason that comes immediately to mind is that the aircraft has been returned from lease, and then the lessor has decided to scrap the aircraft. Normally, an aircraft is returned following a maintenance check. The original airline may not want the next airline flying the aircraft about with their branding on it.
I am sure their are other reasons.
Well normally, a fault occurs, the manufacturer finds the cause, a repair is designed, an SB is issued and airlines incorporate it in their fleet.
Also, why does it appear to be the Japanese 787s that have the majority of the issues?
Perhaps because they were the first to operate the B787, and thus have the highest hours? :p
I’d very much doubt it, other aircraft are grounded and reinstated without drama. I doubt the stored B787’s even had batteries fitted until they were ready to be recommissioned.
Since my last post, this has been posted on the FAA website.
Press Release – FAA Will Review Boeing 787 Design and Production
WASHINGTON – In light of a series of recent events, the FAA will conduct a comprehensive review of the Boeing 787 critical systems, including the design, manufacture and assembly. The purpose of the review is to validate the work conducted during the certification process and further ensure that the aircraft meets the FAA’s high level of safety.
“The safety of the traveling public is our top priority,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “This review will help us look at the root causes and do everything we can to safeguard against similar events in the future.”
A team of FAA and Boeing engineers and inspectors will conduct this joint review, with an emphasis on the aircraft’s electrical power and distribution system. The review will also examine how the electrical and mechanical systems interact with each other.
“We are confident that the aircraft is safe. But we need to have a complete understanding of what is happening,” said FAA Administrator Michael P. Huerta. “We are conducting the review to further ensure that the aircraft meets our high safety standards.”
The review will be structured to provide a broader view of design, manufacturing and assembly and will not focus exclusively on individual events. The review is expected to begin in Seattle, but may expand to other locations over the course of several months.
FAA technical experts logged 200,000 hours of work during the 787 type certification and flew on numerous test flights. The FAA reviews 787 in-service events as part of our continued operational safety process.
United Airlines is currently the only U.S. airline operating the 787, with six airplanes in service. The worldwide in-service fleet includes 50 aircraft.
http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=14213
It has achieved raised hackles of a few, job done for the newpaper! 😀
I dare say, that £85k might be Ok if the expenses system was scrapped!
It has achieved raised hackles of a few, job done for the newpaper! 😀
I dare say, that £85k might be Ok if the expenses system was scrapped!
I can’t find on the FAA or NTSB website information that says they are investigating the 787 other than the incident on the battery fire.
Is it just the BBC putting two and two together?
Post the question on their Twitter, they seem to answer questions quickly there.
MPs have privately said they want a pay rise, with the majority calling for a 32% increase that would take their annual salary to £86,250.
The survey carried out by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) also found more than a third believe they should keep generous final-salary pensions.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/10/mps-call-pay-rise-survey
If an employer came to me to fill in a survey anonymously, I’d say I would want a pay-rise too. If my pension was final-salary, I’d like to keep that too.