Google brought up: http://www.lcacc.org/aircraft/index.html
No CRJ mentioned at all, not even the Challenger 600.
Approved Transport Aircraft
Airbus A318
BAe 146/Avro RJ family
BAe 4100 Jetstream
ATR 42
ATR 72
DHC Dash 7
Bombardier Q Series/DHC Dash 8
Dornier Fairchild 228
Dornier Fairchild Do328
Dornier Fairchild Do328 Jet
Embraer 135
Embraer E170
Embraer E190
Fokker 50
Fokker 70
Saab 340
Saab 2000
Shorts 360-300
Approved Business Aircraft
BE20 Beechcraft 200
BE9L Beechcraft 900
BE58 PA Beechcraft Baron
C90/C90A Beechcraft
B300 Beechcraft
Beech 400A
Hawker 800 XP
C510 (Citation Mustang)
C550 (II) (Citation II)
C560 (Citation V)
C525 CJ1 (Citation Jet 1)
C525 CJ2 (Citation Jet 2)
C525 CJ3 (Citation Jet 3)
C550 (Citation Bravo)
C56X (Citation Excel)
EMB 135BJ (Legacy)
FA900B
FA10 (Falcon 10)
FA50 (Falcon 50)
F7X (Falcon 7X)
F900EX (Falcon 900EX)
Bombardier Challenger 605 (CL60)
Learjet 45 (LJ45)
PA34 (Seneca)
PA31 (Navajo)
P180 (Piaggio Avanti)
Do it for her Mr BSG, here’s some numbers for you of-
specialist removal firms😉
Brilliant! 😀
Do it for her Mr BSG, here’s some numbers for you of-
specialist removal firms😉
Brilliant! 😀
We all know what the medias definition of “runway” is. 🙂
Are they merging with Icelandair too? :p
I get what you have tried to do, but I don’t think it works too well.
The new United livery was growing on me too, but I do think the Continental livery is the one for them to keep. 🙂
I had to Google that to see if it was real, or a fake. Never heard or seen it before. Who thought that up, and do they still have a job? 🙂
I had to Google that to see if it was real, or a fake. Never heard or seen it before. Who thought that up, and do they still have a job? 🙂
Ryanair is like Katie Price, any opportunity to get its name in the spotlight.
Can’t be bad for some. Excellent shots!
Histogram says noooo. 😉
So it does, must be this LCD then. Apologies Lance, 🙂
Lovely, I especially like the KLM B737 – even if a little over-exposed 😮
The fuselage in the first shot has to be a HS.748, no idea to anything else 😮
Did Porter not just refurbish/extend the terminal at YTZ?
The aircraft concerned is NOT flying.
My apologies, I had it in my mind that they found it on one of the planes already flying. 🙂
Except this is NOT test flying is it? It’s production number 23. If all aircaft aren’t flying then it doesn’t really matter if the FAA have said “thou shalt not fly”. Boeing themselves have stopped them flying…it’s not like the 7-late-7 is in any airline’s fleet and so would probably need to get the FAA/JAA to mandate a grounding. Obviously it must be of concern to them otherwise why not continue with the flight test programme?
It is test flying, as all flying B787’s are part of the flight test programme.
Obviously it is a concern to Boeing engineers, it is a manufacturing defect that could have been repeated of every ship set of the horizontal stabilizers.
Really, I don’t understand the point your making?