dark light

ThreeSpool

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,083 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LCY Question #538851
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Google brought up: http://www.lcacc.org/aircraft/index.html

    No CRJ mentioned at all, not even the Challenger 600.

    Approved Transport Aircraft

    Airbus A318
    BAe 146/Avro RJ family
    BAe 4100 Jetstream
    ATR 42
    ATR 72
    DHC Dash 7
    Bombardier Q Series/DHC Dash 8
    Dornier Fairchild 228
    Dornier Fairchild Do328
    Dornier Fairchild Do328 Jet
    Embraer 135
    Embraer E170
    Embraer E190
    Fokker 50
    Fokker 70
    Saab 340
    Saab 2000
    Shorts 360-300

    Approved Business Aircraft

    BE20 Beechcraft 200
    BE9L Beechcraft 900
    BE58 PA Beechcraft Baron
    C90/C90A Beechcraft
    B300 Beechcraft
    Beech 400A
    Hawker 800 XP
    C510 (Citation Mustang)
    C550 (II) (Citation II)
    C560 (Citation V)
    C525 CJ1 (Citation Jet 1)
    C525 CJ2 (Citation Jet 2)
    C525 CJ3 (Citation Jet 3)
    C550 (Citation Bravo)
    C56X (Citation Excel)
    EMB 135BJ (Legacy)
    FA900B
    FA10 (Falcon 10)
    FA50 (Falcon 50)
    F7X (Falcon 7X)
    F900EX (Falcon 900EX)
    Bombardier Challenger 605 (CL60)
    Learjet 45 (LJ45)
    PA34 (Seneca)
    PA31 (Navajo)
    P180 (Piaggio Avanti)

    in reply to: General Discussion #347123
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Do it for her Mr BSG, here’s some numbers for you of-
    specialist removal firms

    😉

    Brilliant! 😀

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today? Part 2 #1916572
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Do it for her Mr BSG, here’s some numbers for you of-
    specialist removal firms

    😉

    Brilliant! 😀

    in reply to: US-Russia spy swap at VIE #540628
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    We all know what the medias definition of “runway” is. 🙂

    in reply to: UA/COA merger livery #541687
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Are they merging with Icelandair too? :p

    I get what you have tried to do, but I don’t think it works too well.

    The new United livery was growing on me too, but I do think the Continental livery is the one for them to keep. 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #348858
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    I had to Google that to see if it was real, or a fake. Never heard or seen it before. Who thought that up, and do they still have a job? 🙂

    in reply to: UK's most dangerous roads #1917434
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    I had to Google that to see if it was real, or a fake. Never heard or seen it before. Who thought that up, and do they still have a job? 🙂

    in reply to: RyanAir Standing and 1 toilet with charges #541905
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Ryanair is like Katie Price, any opportunity to get its name in the spotlight.

    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Can’t be bad for some. Excellent shots!

    in reply to: The Heavy Mob (MAN 27/6/10) #439776
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Histogram says noooo. 😉

    So it does, must be this LCD then. Apologies Lance, 🙂

    in reply to: The Heavy Mob (MAN 27/6/10) #439778
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Lovely, I especially like the KLM B737 – even if a little over-exposed 😮

    in reply to: Glastonbury aircraft bits #1100648
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    The fuselage in the first shot has to be a HS.748, no idea to anything else 😮

    in reply to: AC & CO get slots at YTZ! #542326
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Did Porter not just refurbish/extend the terminal at YTZ?

    in reply to: The 787 Progress to Commercial Flight Thread #542544
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    The aircraft concerned is NOT flying.

    My apologies, I had it in my mind that they found it on one of the planes already flying. 🙂

    in reply to: The 787 Progress to Commercial Flight Thread #542698
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Except this is NOT test flying is it? It’s production number 23. If all aircaft aren’t flying then it doesn’t really matter if the FAA have said “thou shalt not fly”. Boeing themselves have stopped them flying…it’s not like the 7-late-7 is in any airline’s fleet and so would probably need to get the FAA/JAA to mandate a grounding. Obviously it must be of concern to them otherwise why not continue with the flight test programme?

    It is test flying, as all flying B787’s are part of the flight test programme.

    Obviously it is a concern to Boeing engineers, it is a manufacturing defect that could have been repeated of every ship set of the horizontal stabilizers.

    Really, I don’t understand the point your making?

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,083 total)