But Airbus fans will no doubt make it sound like a disaster similar to the Hindenberg.
True, but anyone with an ounce of common sense would know that this is exactly the sort of thing the test flying is all about. Finding and rectifying faults.
I don’t think Turkish Airlines will be the sticking point, but rather IST as their hub.
Never say never.
Apparently they are for the 777 series.
The 77W doesn’t quite equate to an A380, which would suggest they have little to no need for an A380.
You would also have to have all the seats synchronized otherwise there would be massive burns to other passengers.
Perfect Weather and Perfect Images! Well Done Paul 🙂
Strangely for me, listening to the City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra is making me smile. 🙂
Strangely for me, listening to the City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra is making me smile. 🙂
Interesting.
When I opened the thread I was expecting a reoccurrence of the BA A320 dispatched with spoiler gags still in place.
Isn’t there an SB out for the modification of RR C-ducts due to this very problem?
I remember there being a good picture of a Malaysian B777 throwing its C-Duct liner out the back.
A certain young lady driver 😡
A certain young lady driver 😡
Excellent set, really like the AF A318!
Where did the allegation of “texting” come from? Perhaps they were filming using the camera rather than texting.
Ooh, I wasn’t aware of the Queen Air and Twin Bonanza share the same leading edge design inboard and outboard of the engines.
However, I think the nacelles on the wreck might be too thin for the piston engines of those two models. I’m happy to be proven wrong however.It is entirely possible that with the right ref numbers from the wreck combined with a member of the forum with access to the right database, we could even actualy identify the plane itself. Though, considering the condition of the wreck and the lack of the rear fuselage were any registration or serial number is bound to be, this may not be possible in this instance.
Just give the boy a cookie already 😀
I am with Bmused on this one. Undoubtably a 90 Series King Air. There does appear to be a portion missing from the end of the wing, plus the aileron is missing too.
It is worth mentioning too that a lot of King Airs are modified (such as Raisbeck) to include various items such as gear doors, four-blade props, etc.