Close to airshow, how about the view from my seat of the Coronation Fly Past
In the Suez Canal Zone

I believe the first sales were to the Syrians. 219s CO took an aircraft up there to demonstrate to them just before they were disbanded. (When we scuttled out of the Canal Zone)
Now there is a true gentleman, he deserves another medal for that.
Doug has made contact thanks, and that is an NF13 I have just posted on the “something different” thread.
Here’s another parachute on the way out

Superb pics as always. Many thanks.
And here is another Pole in his natural environment
Collecting manhole covers is not sad. It is a very profitable hobby indulged in by the non tax paying fraternity.
Ray Holmes book should be essential reading for anyone interested in a WWII expert.
He shot down the He111 which crashed on Victoria station in 1940, and as the thread shows , was still an expert PR pilot late in the war.
Why were we sitting calmly having our breakfast on a Sunday morning when some evil Squarehead shot us up ???
Certainly there were many instances of the Luftwaffe shooting at anything that moved and haystacks etc. But many incidents I suspect were the result of aircraft firing at other aircraft and the rounds falling short.
We were having breakfast one Sunday morning when 3 cannon shells hit the bungalow, two of them came within a few feet of the window we were sitting by. We thought we had been strafed, but I remember only hearing the explosions followed by two? aircraft going over the house and further bursts of firing.
As you say times were very different and cannot be judged by todays strange moral standards. As I have said before “The only good German is a dead one”, How non PC is that??
Totally unlikely. When one is low flying, even say at 150 kts, to be able to see someone inside a house and properly register the scene in that split second, is just not believable.
In the Meteor NF one was close enough to the visor not to have to lean too much, and of course the harness moved with one.
In the Mosquito I only did the straps up for take off, and, if I remembered, for landing. The radar was a bit forward and needed a hunched position to see into the visor. It was also necessary to swivel round 90 degrees towards the pilot to operate any nav equipment which was behind the pilots seat. That’s what I blame my poor posture on anyway. 🙂 One sat several inches below and behind the pilot. He had a proper seat, the nav had a cushion on the front end of the bomb bay. The pilots view was not seriously inconvenienced.
As for the British developed AI radars the least said the better. We developed the original American SCR 520/720 sets to a very usable system and then bought the resultant AI Mk10 from Westinghouse for serious dollars.
AI MkIX was developed in parallel, using the same cavity magnetron, but was a more ambitious set. It was also dogged by production problems and was so long in development that it missed out. It was exported postwar to Yugoslavia in the Mosquito NF38, which did not enter RAF service. The tubes were very small and therefore difficult to interpret.
This contraption was developed into AI Mk17 or 18 by the simple expedient of a better 3cm magnetron and by strapping a magnifying glass over the tube:eek::eek::mad::mad:
I was posted out to Egypt in Feb ’52 and corresponded with a girlfriend to whom I was almost engaged. She was keen on aircraft and went to that display.
Her letters rapidly tailed off afterwards and soon ceased altogether.
Another lucky escape 😀
Propstrike makes some very pertinent points. May I also add that no part of the aircraft should be cut off at the edge of the pic. This destroys the illusion of movement, and the subject is apparently locked in place. Also leave more room ahead of the aircraft than behind it, to give it space to fly in to.