Accident in swiss mountains

In this article

http://www.tages-anzeiger.ch/dyn/news/schweiz/740267.html

It is said the Tornado flew at 1200 – 1300 m height (above see level), which must looks as shown bellow.

Swiss military pilot Rudolf Läubli (who I happen to know myself) mentioned that the Swiss airforce would not fly that low through a mountain valley!

How much possibility of these are Chinese next generation jetfighter?
The first one called Wei Long? The Second one called Xue Xiao?
Who know what does those mean?

It means, it’s allready flying !! Havn’t you been told?

… and P.S.: its more than just PS

see here:

How to keep it cool…

and other tricks in designing FALCON, like … testing an inward-turning, or axisymmetric, scramjet inlet under the Falcon combined-cycle engine technology programme.

read here: http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2006/11/21/Navigation/250/210700/How+Falcon+hypersonic+vehicle+will+keep+its+cool+.html

so why don’t you try the search function on FALCON?

That’s Lockheed’s SENIOR PEG ATB design, the loser in the B-2 competition.

But the dark plane in the first two pics is definitely not SENIOR PEG which would be easy to recognise because of it’s funny tail!

This silouette reminds me more of something that has been called

Lockheed Tier 3 Quartz

Allwetterjagdflugzeug
Allwetterabfangjaeger

let’s not exaggerate and go back to things like the

EINTOPFZERKNALLTREIBLING (Neudeutsch: Einzylindermotor)

It would probably end up looking something like this –

The FB-22 perhaps has the potential to become what in another thread of this forum has been called “the 2018 bomber”. What I meant with my pic (of the A-17 or however it might been named) was something that “could be in service since the mid ’90s”, as WP840 said.

This aircraft, a “brother of YF-23”, is clearly based on 1990 technology, with convectional engines and max. speed of M 1,5 – 2. Therefore it is definitely not the rumoured AURORA!