Part numbers for the Dove and Devon start 104, the Heron 114, the Trident 121 etc.
Excellent work Elliott.
de Havilland only used the last two digits for the parts id on DH.110 / Sea Vixen, ie 10 for DH.110 series, 10-20 for DH.110 Mk.20x (inc FAW.1) onwards, and 10-22 for items specific to FAW.2. this was folowed by the two letters denoting where the item was on the aircraft.
Rob, are you sure about the SA no.s for the Sturgeon, I could be wrong myself (apologies if so) but thought that S.38 & S.39 were the Shorts part number prefixes?
The reason the RAF Museum chose to honour my grandfather with the restoration of the Alex Henshaw Swift and its placement at Cosford was because Nick Comper was in every sense one of them.
Hi Stephen, apologies if my post is seen in anyway as a slight on your grandfathers memory or achievements. It was a comment made on what on the face of it to me seemed like an odd move by the RAFM, but your post has put things into perspective and it is fantastic to see that these pioneering peoples lives are valued and remembered.
I have always admired the classic lines of the Swift and the Mouse, and the C.25 looks like something straight from Biggles or Tintin.
Fantastic website and probably worth starting a new thread on Nick’s work, so that the more people here will get notice of it.
James
It’s been a while since I’ve seen the film, but seemed to remember that the Mustang sequences were the most terrific warbird scenes, visually and soundwise, that I’ve seen in a film.
Will definitely check out your blog:)
Both the RAF Museums’ Canberra PR.3 and its Avro Lincoln were kept in storage at their RAF Henlow facility in the late 1960s, that would give some credence to the film being shot at Henlow, however the hangars kind of look wrong to me aswel.
Nice film though, especially seeing the Shackleton (pre phase III) and Beverley in colour.
Edit, looking again, it does look like the big main hangar/workshops which sat isolated from the others at Henlow, and as Arm Waver says the stack would also be right.
Supurb, no mean achievement getting decent winter shots!
Could well be, all in the mists of time now!
Yes, strangely I kind of knew the producer via a college friend, I helped by collating some Shackleton noises from somewhere!
That’s it, thanks, istr it was bout 20-30 mins long?
My understanding is that the withdrawal date was edging forwards due to deployment use, but unsure if that meant that 2013 would be the final year of service.
Here at St Athan the servicing of the type is rapidly coming to an end.
The last major servicing was carried out on K.3 ZA147/F which departed in Nov 2010.
Minor servicing continues here, C.1K XR808/R (earmarked for RAFM preservation) departed in Nov ’11, and there are currently two in for servicing, C.1K XV106/W and K.3 ZA150/J, one of them is due to depart back to Brize this afternoon.
This servicing comes to an end in February 2012 and we are expecting the last VC-10 in fairly soon.

XR808 5 03-11-11 (9)ed by jamtey71, on Flickr

VC-10 C.1K XV106 / W arriving 3 Nov 2011 by jamtey71, on Flickr

VC-10 C.1K XV106 / W arriving 3 Nov 2011 by jamtey71, on Flickr

VC-10 K.3 ZA150 / J ariving 2 Nov 2011 by jamtey71, on Flickr
BTW for spotting I thoroughly recommend trying to get to St Athan, the view from the public roads at both ends of the runway is excellent (especially on RW 08) and because of the compact nature of the airfield the approach and departure techniques can be very interesting, departures are usually conducted with miniumun test and delivery fuel and are quite spirited!
If there’s enough interest here I can post more pictures
Excellent news and progress there Rich, knocking up a new Shack yoke must require some clever work?
2. Roundel Police. The cake is definitely ex RAAF and ‘returned to country of origin’ on the customs forms. Example of roundel here:-
What roundel?:confused:
Hope you had a good one Peter.
I remember in 1989 thinking that this was the Shack that should be rescued and preserved, it was in timewarp condition from when it left service as an MR.2.
I do think that the market is ready for an indepth and well put across study on this subject, make a change from some of the single type books which some types seem to have been overly exposed.
I quite agree with AllanK, there is a perfect opportunity here to cover the economic, political, & social aspects of British Aero industry, rather than just concentraing on the actual tin bashing – covering these important facets should prevent eyes glazing over and create a rare chance for these subjects to creep into an aircraft book.
Even the organisation and hierachy of the Aero companies themselves would make fascinating reading, as would the linked subject to dispersed production, that of the planned dispersed mass storage and quick erection of aircraft when needed for front-line use by the AM/RAF.
My point is that AlertKen, and indeed Allen, often manage to put these points across very well here without being too ‘rose tinted’ or disparaging.
Thanks chaps!:)
Thanks chaps!:)