dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,446 through 2,460 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Meteor in the mountains #1056494
    pagen01
    Participant

    I think the earlier U.15s (F.4) didn’t have the longer pointy nose cone.

    in reply to: Mosquito ride up for grabs #1057423
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m just cutting and swaging some dustbin lids as I speak!

    in reply to: Kuwait AF Lightnings #1057542
    pagen01
    Participant

    I will be meeting a few pilots who flew KAF Lightnings on Thursday if anyone has any specific questions they’d like asking – let me know

    Yes, can you politely ask if any of them can post something here, or maybe pass forward some of their experiences for someone else to post up?
    Would be fascinating to hear from pilots involved.

    If that fails, serviceability of aircraft and how long they were actually used for would be interesting to know?

    Yours hopefully:cool:

    in reply to: A4 wrecked by crane #1057662
    pagen01
    Participant

    A thousand pardons if this is a re-post, just stumbled across it.

    It has, but you get a Pagey pardon anyway!:cool:

    ISTR a Tornado that ended up the same way, in Saudi or somewhere?

    in reply to: Another Hunter back in the air #1058215
    pagen01
    Participant

    My favourite Hunter, great news to here that it is flying again.

    These pics from early 2000s,

    http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6149/5940633009_7775690edf_b.jpg
    Hunter XL573 cartridge start by Glassjar, on Flickr

    http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6020/5940633605_fd80c1dbc3_b.jpg
    Hunter XL573 s2 by Glassjar, on Flickr

    in reply to: Largest postwar Royal Navy aircraft? #1058228
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m ready for a surprise here, but as far as I’m aware the Neptune was only used by RAF Coastal Command, not by the Royal Navy.

    in reply to: General Discussion #288246
    pagen01
    Participant

    My provider is Orange so that wouldn’t have effected me, forum seems fine again now, the odd thing is that when I have the problems it’s the forum that really seems to struggle to load.
    I will get on to my ISP.

    in reply to: Forum go slow? #1872854
    pagen01
    Participant

    My provider is Orange so that wouldn’t have effected me, forum seems fine again now, the odd thing is that when I have the problems it’s the forum that really seems to struggle to load.
    I will get on to my ISP.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Lancasters, info required. #1058606
    pagen01
    Participant

    Sadly I have to agree with Lee, it is doubtful that Royal Navy markings were applied and I would think taht the aircraft were still in bomber command colours.
    A small correction, the 780sqn Lancasters were taken on immediately post war and were struck of charge by late 1946, mid ’47.
    It would be interesting to know how they would have looked if the scheme was succesful, I would think that they would have looked very similar to the camoflaged Coastal Command ASR.IIIs, with two tone camoflage upper and sky undersides, but with Navy titles.

    in reply to: Video – Jaguar and Sea Harrier as art… #1058767
    pagen01
    Participant

    Good little video, I did wonder how the beautiful polished effect was achieved with the Jaguar, and how the aircraft were erected in the display space.
    It would be niave to think that Fiona did all the heavy work on these projects herself and at least the film shows that others were involved.

    It’s probably an unpopular view here, but I do actually like what she achieved with these aircraft, it is obvious that she has a deep seated passion for aircraft going back to her younger days. I certainly can’t knock someone who was able to go out and buy a complete Sea Harrier & Jaguar (of which there are many about and available) and then work and display them into something different and thought provoking – whether we like it or not.
    My only beef was that the complete aircraft were never retained for preservation after the display, certainly the Jaguar would have looked very impressive, I wonder if Fiona could have been more pro-active about that.

    As an aside my ops manager flew ‘Buster Gonad’ in GW1.

    in reply to: F4U slowly deteriorating!! #1058922
    pagen01
    Participant

    Is that STILL outside? Personally, I would rather see it with the other prototypes at Cosford, inside. It would also be closer to “home”.

    Absolutely agree with that, you would think a mutually agreeable trade could be organised. It was still outside in mid 2010.

    in reply to: Top Air Museums in England #1058927
    pagen01
    Participant

    FAA Museum Yeovilton = Royal Navy aircraft collection
    RAF Museum Cosford = Royal Air Force and prototype/research aircraft
    Newark Air Museum = mixture, but mainly post-war military, inc good foreign content
    IWM, AAM, & DAS Duxford = Best American military content outside US, British military, British airliners & civil, and largest UK collection of based flying historic aircraft, inc workshops.

    However, answers to your question will be very subjective given specialist interests of different members, ie I really like Fleet Air Arm and British post-war military aviation, particularly prototypes.

    The Science Museum at S.Kensington, as JDK rightly points out, is a treasure trove of outstanding aircraft in aviation history, but possibly won’t merit a day (unless you take in the rest of this fantastic museum – eg good spaceflight stuff), maybe that could be combined with a visit to the Imperial War Museum at Lambeth which also houses a small but very distinguished list of aircraft.

    in reply to: Largest postwar Royal Navy aircraft? #1059098
    pagen01
    Participant

    Not assumption, assertion maybe! I was sent some info by a an ex Navy hand years ago, but there is a bit of info here,

    http://www.lancaster-archive.com/lanc_postwar-royalnavy.htm

    http://www.royalnavyresearcharchive.org.uk/Article_Lancasters.htm

    I must admit that when Graham first posted I was hoping it would be photos of these Lancasters!

    I think the Gosport Lancs that you refer to are different and with a different unit, possibly with RAF ASWDU who regularly operated with the Royal Navy?

    in reply to: Carrier Conundrum #1059209
    pagen01
    Participant

    …not until the time that a 200,000Ib laden Victor tanker has to be catapaulted off anyway!

    I seem to remember them struggling with the 9,000ft at Mawgan when heavy!

    in reply to: Largest postwar Royal Navy aircraft? #1059402
    pagen01
    Participant

    Come on pagey 😀 Lighten up, we cant always be right you know 😉

    Very good Ben! I think people take me way too seriously anyway, but there is no way that I’m resorting to using smilies all the time, I don’t want to be that obvious!

    Gerry I mentioned the Lancasters in post #4:p

Viewing 15 posts - 2,446 through 2,460 (of 9,672 total)