dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1099317
    pagen01
    Participant

    It was the forward part I was interested in, wasn’t worried about the minor differences from the leading edge of the fillet aft.

    in reply to: Sunderland at St Mawgan #1099322
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks JDK, apparently the the engines were still running as the crew got out?
    I wish I hadn’t mentioned trolley take offs now!

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1099184
    pagen01
    Participant

    Quick, but I may be wrong, we will await the cavalry!

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1099193
    pagen01
    Participant

    Looks like a Miles Gemini to me, but as for which one…

    in reply to: Stranraer's 'dolly' take off #1099113
    pagen01
    Participant

    Wow, I’m gllad I mentioned trolley take offs now!
    That does look pretty precarious though, no brakes is one thing, but what about sudden side gusts, they must have picked the calmest day!
    Thanks for sharing.

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1099141
    pagen01
    Participant

    Considering that the prototype (G-AGUS) made its first flight in late ’45, I wonder if it could be it in the picture?
    Do you have a more precise date Lyffe?

    in reply to: Stranraer's 'dolly' take off #1098991
    pagen01
    Participant

    It definitely comes under the heading of ‘what could possibly go wrong?’

    Tethering rope not being long enough…

    in reply to: Stranraer's 'dolly' take off #1099034
    pagen01
    Participant

    Sometimes things just look wrong…

    Fascinating that the surviving Stranraer flew as recently as the 1960s aswel, imagine if that had been kept on the show circuit!

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1099036
    pagen01
    Participant

    I was trying to figure the rear windows out, and the fact that ‘GUS had fixed undercarriage should help, but the pic is too washed out. It did have light lettering against a light background at one stage though.

    in reply to: Early Prop recovered from the Sea #1098851
    pagen01
    Participant

    Prop boss looks wrong for Swordfish, not sure about those weights on one either.

    in reply to: Aircraft type please (1946) #1098852
    pagen01
    Participant

    very good, I think the colour was possibly cream with red dashes, John will know better though.

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Latest #1098858
    pagen01
    Participant

    Hmm new large arrivals. Nimrod? VC10? The possibilities…:)

    VC-10 has another three or so years of service yet, even though the majors finish at the end of this year.
    Nimrods, I’m a bit out of touch with these now but I didn’t think that the new version was cleared in sufficient numbers to replace the MR.2 yet?
    Was thinking Hercules C.1 and 4, but understand that they are still required by SF duties.

    in reply to: Sunderland at St Mawgan #1098689
    pagen01
    Participant

    Nice one Richard, I assume copies can be obtained at cost?

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Latest #1098699
    pagen01
    Participant

    Blimey, talk about reducing effective force, makes you wonder how small the MR fleet will end up?

    in reply to: Sunderland at St Mawgan #1098512
    pagen01
    Participant

    Oh, well at least you got to see it by appointment.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 9,672 total)