dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,761 through 2,775 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A Collection of U.K. Aviation Photos from 1930's #1043468
    pagen01
    Participant

    The D.H. Albatross must surely be the most beautiful aircraft of all time?
    That is a type I would love to see a replica of.

    More fantastic photos, thanks again for sharing with us.

    in reply to: Warbird additions in the Netherlands #1043596
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks for you clarification and pictures of the Trackers Jur.
    Yes the Norseman looks absolutely superb, it would be nice to see in the air, a different shape!

    in reply to: Warbird additions in the Netherlands #1043616
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks GS, actually I was assuming that the Norseman is being restored to fly, but this is possibly not correct?

    in reply to: The End of the "Aerodrome" #1043642
    pagen01
    Participant

    Surely ‘charabanc’ is falling out of use because the actual object has pretty well disapeared?
    A charabanc is a particular early form of single floor motor passenger transport, with an open roof and laid out more like a horse drawn carriage for passengers.

    in reply to: Warbird additions in the Netherlands #1043665
    pagen01
    Participant

    Norseman looks lovely!:) Must admit I’m struggling to see what is wrong with the national markings aswel.
    Is the Tracker a potential flyer or a museum exhibit?

    in reply to: The future for the Red Arrows? #2326952
    pagen01
    Participant

    One should not assume, that because people are indifferent to the spectacle
    of the Red Arrows flying display, they are indifferent to the loss of one of their
    pilots.

    Very nicely and swiftly put, great to see that some people understand the basic question here amongst the hysterics.

    For the O.P to post what he did, is the most insensitive thing I have ever read on Key, so soon after this tragic event happened.

    Jim, it would have been best to have left the lynch mob attitude behind, interesting that this thread has descended to ‘General Discussion’ levels, with the same usual participants.

    I would agree that the timing was slightly misguided, but the basic topic of the Reds long term survival is a valid one for debate in Modern Military, and indeed has been discussed before (as linked by Fedaykin).

    Working quite closely with Hawks, the question over the Hawk T.1 has been around for a while aswel. There have been concerns that the type is slowly being withdrawn from the training units (as they get the new T.2s) with the Red Arrows ending up as the sole user of the old and tired type.
    My understanding is that current policy is not to replace the T.1 with the new T.2 (not enough of them ordered) in the Reds, and that when it goes they would have to think about their survival either with another type or worse.
    This could be wrong though and maybe someone can clarify?

    Most of the type have had major work done to them, mainly in strengthening/replacing the rear fuselages and unfortunately it is highly susceptible to bird strike.
    This is mainly down to its operating arena, both with the Reds and training sqns, ie a lot of low-level and over the sea work. However its single engine has marginal performance when things go wrong and a strike occurs.

    The basic point I was addressing earlier was to Nashios’ general assertion that we are all Red Arrows supporters, well I’m afraid we aren’t all supporters, and to say that I am would be a lie. All this ‘posters are ‘creepy’ or ‘unpatriotic’ rubbish is absurd and insulting. I’m as patriotic as most, I just don’t get service aero/formation teams and never have I’m afraid. That is in no way not to say that the majority of the public do enjoy them and that they have their place in aviation.

    As someone who works on an MoD airfield/tower and meets these wonderful people on a daily basis, I want to reiterate what I said in post #3. My thoughts are with the family of a brave airman that gave his all and proudly served his county in war and served the airforce to the public arena, aswel as it appears staying with the jet to avoid any loss of life on the ground.
    A very sad day.

    in reply to: The End of the "Aerodrome" #1043807
    pagen01
    Participant

    As for ‘aerodrome’, when I was younger I found it to be an arcane and archaic term and always used the words airport or airfield instead.

    From another thread, these were the definitions as I understand them,

    RAF = Airfield (as defined in A.P.3236)
    Light personal use, no facilities = Landing Ground
    Civil landing field with minor facilities = Aerodrome
    Passenger, Commercial & Freight (usually with customs) = Airport

    However like any official use of words other words are often more commonly and generally applied and Aerodrome (derived from Greek aeros & dromos, course, so air course) seems to have been used over a range of different types of airfields.

    The official use of ‘aerodrome’ is stronger than ever, it is the main term used by CAA/CAP requirements for licencing and guidelines. JSP (military) guidelines are looking to harmonise with CAP terms. ‘Airfield’ does seem to be used a lot more with smaller civil grounds now.
    I guess the public don’t use the word so much now though.

    in reply to: A Collection of U.K. Aviation Photos from 1930's #1044519
    pagen01
    Participant

    Superb quality and unusual photos, thanks for sharing here:)
    I wonder what event is going on in the H.P.45 picture?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1044528
    pagen01
    Participant

    This is where I will probably end up being wrong – again:o

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1044679
    pagen01
    Participant

    I think he believed he had what he described and has given the potential bidder the option to read the serial nos and correct him.
    You obviously have the knowledge, let him know, be interesting to see if he corrects the listing?

    in reply to: The future for the Red Arrows? #2327787
    pagen01
    Participant

    Ive never met a single person who doesnt think the reds are fantastic, they are a symbol of our airforce, not only that a worldwide known symbol of the UK.

    You have, me.

    I’m not saying that I agree entirely with the opening post, but the Reds (in line with most aeros/formation teams) have never done it for me I’m afraid.
    That is not in any way to say that yesterday was not a tragic loss of a talented pilots life that gave his all to both fight for his country and entertain the public on behalf of the RAF – something which has to be totally admired. It must be a terrible time for his family and comrades.
    I can’t help thinking that there will be a some kind of review about the continuing operations of the Hawk T.1.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1044825
    pagen01
    Participant

    They can take digital photos, create an ad on ebay, manage their paypal account etc, etc but they can’t do a five second google search before posting rubbish!

    A little harsh, in fairness he says

    I HAVE TAKEN PICTURES OF THE NUMBERS / SERIAL NO’S ON THE SET SO ANYONE WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THIS TYPE OF EQUIPMENT WOULD BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY IT.

    I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM PEOPLE…

    in reply to: Canberra crash Crewkerne 60's/70's? #1044966
    pagen01
    Participant

    I have little respect for the ASN website which is made to look official and authoritive but is anything but. However, it was posted as a reference so needed challenging.

    I don’t think ASN purports to be anything more than it is, a list of many military and civil accidents on one easy to use site which must be a massive task to collate, let alone research every accident and correct the generally known info.
    I find that it’s a good starting point and is up to the reader to further research the incident.

    in reply to: General Discussion #291290
    pagen01
    Participant

    No problems with the forum for me at all, I’ve always said you lot are a little slow!:p:p

    in reply to: Forum on go slow. #1837815
    pagen01
    Participant

    No problems with the forum for me at all, I’ve always said you lot are a little slow!:p:p

Viewing 15 posts - 2,761 through 2,775 (of 9,672 total)