The D.H. Albatross must surely be the most beautiful aircraft of all time?
That is a type I would love to see a replica of.
More fantastic photos, thanks again for sharing with us.
Thanks for you clarification and pictures of the Trackers Jur.
Yes the Norseman looks absolutely superb, it would be nice to see in the air, a different shape!
Thanks GS, actually I was assuming that the Norseman is being restored to fly, but this is possibly not correct?
Surely ‘charabanc’ is falling out of use because the actual object has pretty well disapeared?
A charabanc is a particular early form of single floor motor passenger transport, with an open roof and laid out more like a horse drawn carriage for passengers.
Norseman looks lovely!:) Must admit I’m struggling to see what is wrong with the national markings aswel.
Is the Tracker a potential flyer or a museum exhibit?
One should not assume, that because people are indifferent to the spectacle
of the Red Arrows flying display, they are indifferent to the loss of one of their
pilots.
Very nicely and swiftly put, great to see that some people understand the basic question here amongst the hysterics.
For the O.P to post what he did, is the most insensitive thing I have ever read on Key, so soon after this tragic event happened.
Jim, it would have been best to have left the lynch mob attitude behind, interesting that this thread has descended to ‘General Discussion’ levels, with the same usual participants.
I would agree that the timing was slightly misguided, but the basic topic of the Reds long term survival is a valid one for debate in Modern Military, and indeed has been discussed before (as linked by Fedaykin).
Working quite closely with Hawks, the question over the Hawk T.1 has been around for a while aswel. There have been concerns that the type is slowly being withdrawn from the training units (as they get the new T.2s) with the Red Arrows ending up as the sole user of the old and tired type.
My understanding is that current policy is not to replace the T.1 with the new T.2 (not enough of them ordered) in the Reds, and that when it goes they would have to think about their survival either with another type or worse.
This could be wrong though and maybe someone can clarify?
Most of the type have had major work done to them, mainly in strengthening/replacing the rear fuselages and unfortunately it is highly susceptible to bird strike.
This is mainly down to its operating arena, both with the Reds and training sqns, ie a lot of low-level and over the sea work. However its single engine has marginal performance when things go wrong and a strike occurs.
The basic point I was addressing earlier was to Nashios’ general assertion that we are all Red Arrows supporters, well I’m afraid we aren’t all supporters, and to say that I am would be a lie. All this ‘posters are ‘creepy’ or ‘unpatriotic’ rubbish is absurd and insulting. I’m as patriotic as most, I just don’t get service aero/formation teams and never have I’m afraid. That is in no way not to say that the majority of the public do enjoy them and that they have their place in aviation.
As someone who works on an MoD airfield/tower and meets these wonderful people on a daily basis, I want to reiterate what I said in post #3. My thoughts are with the family of a brave airman that gave his all and proudly served his county in war and served the airforce to the public arena, aswel as it appears staying with the jet to avoid any loss of life on the ground.
A very sad day.
As for ‘aerodrome’, when I was younger I found it to be an arcane and archaic term and always used the words airport or airfield instead.
From another thread, these were the definitions as I understand them,
RAF = Airfield (as defined in A.P.3236)
Light personal use, no facilities = Landing Ground
Civil landing field with minor facilities = Aerodrome
Passenger, Commercial & Freight (usually with customs) = Airport
However like any official use of words other words are often more commonly and generally applied and Aerodrome (derived from Greek aeros & dromos, course, so air course) seems to have been used over a range of different types of airfields.
The official use of ‘aerodrome’ is stronger than ever, it is the main term used by CAA/CAP requirements for licencing and guidelines. JSP (military) guidelines are looking to harmonise with CAP terms. ‘Airfield’ does seem to be used a lot more with smaller civil grounds now.
I guess the public don’t use the word so much now though.
Superb quality and unusual photos, thanks for sharing here:)
I wonder what event is going on in the H.P.45 picture?
This is where I will probably end up being wrong – again:o
I think he believed he had what he described and has given the potential bidder the option to read the serial nos and correct him.
You obviously have the knowledge, let him know, be interesting to see if he corrects the listing?
Ive never met a single person who doesnt think the reds are fantastic, they are a symbol of our airforce, not only that a worldwide known symbol of the UK.
You have, me.
I’m not saying that I agree entirely with the opening post, but the Reds (in line with most aeros/formation teams) have never done it for me I’m afraid.
That is not in any way to say that yesterday was not a tragic loss of a talented pilots life that gave his all to both fight for his country and entertain the public on behalf of the RAF – something which has to be totally admired. It must be a terrible time for his family and comrades.
I can’t help thinking that there will be a some kind of review about the continuing operations of the Hawk T.1.
They can take digital photos, create an ad on ebay, manage their paypal account etc, etc but they can’t do a five second google search before posting rubbish!
A little harsh, in fairness he says
I HAVE TAKEN PICTURES OF THE NUMBERS / SERIAL NO’S ON THE SET SO ANYONE WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THIS TYPE OF EQUIPMENT WOULD BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY IT.
I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM PEOPLE…
I have little respect for the ASN website which is made to look official and authoritive but is anything but. However, it was posted as a reference so needed challenging.
I don’t think ASN purports to be anything more than it is, a list of many military and civil accidents on one easy to use site which must be a massive task to collate, let alone research every accident and correct the generally known info.
I find that it’s a good starting point and is up to the reader to further research the incident.
No problems with the forum for me at all, I’ve always said you lot are a little slow!:p:p
No problems with the forum for me at all, I’ve always said you lot are a little slow!:p:p