dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,896 through 2,910 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Help in Saving Trident 1C G-ARPO #1072538
    pagen01
    Participant

    Amazing work, the dedication to the type by you guys is incredible!:)

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1072693
    pagen01
    Participant

    YES!!!!! Hopefully for Legends 2011 there will be two Corsairs flying together.

    It’s been mate!:D

    in reply to: Shackleton XF708 IWM Duxford #1072703
    pagen01
    Participant

    The MR.3s that went to Kemble were the very last ones in flying service, hence rarely obtaining an ‘M’ serial before scrap, preservation, fire use.
    Many of the previously withdrawn examples went to St Athan as spares and standby airframes and then ended up going through the maintenance and fire etc training systems.
    They were SoC after service use, not necessarily straight after front-line use.
    Unsure why RCBA didn’t record the SoC dates of these in the book, but I wonder if it was to do with something as simple as timing and referring back to these individual histories retrospectively?

    T/O RCBA has WR977s late history as

    Returned to 203 Sqn 8.70 and remained until allocated to Thorney Island for practice fire fighting 11.71. Allotment cancelled and WR977 was ferried to Finningley 8.11.71 for the Museum with maintenance serial 8186M. Later disposed of to the Newark Air Museum, the aircraft being dismantled and moved to the site on Winthorpe airfield by road 1.5.77. Current.

    Thanks to Mo Botwoods’ excellent site for cutting & pasting the info.

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1072921
    pagen01
    Participant

    That’s how a C-47 should look – beautiful!:)

    in reply to: Shackleton XF708 IWM Duxford #1072929
    pagen01
    Participant

    The individual histories compiled by Chris Ashworth don’t list a date for struck off charge, or a maintenance serial.

    Nor does he for WR977, and XF708 wouldn’t have had enough time between leaving flying service and going to Duxford to have become a maintenance airframe.
    I’m surprised at this latest revelation as every publication that I have that mentions ‘708 says that it was given to the IWM. I’m wondering if the definition of given and indefinite loan have blurred slightly here.
    If I was really cynical I could think that it would be convenient to say that an airframe that you no longer want to look after was a loaned item – now that would be similar to the Beverley story!

    However I’m not and I can see that it is at least cared for at the moment and that IWM are giving assurances about its future.

    in reply to: Lysander Glider tugs. #1073194
    pagen01
    Participant

    I believe our very own Judwin is custodian of Westland archives, maybe worth a PM.
    Having said that I’m guessing that this mod. was very much ‘after market’?

    in reply to: Shackleton XF708 IWM Duxford #1073198
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks for taking the time to seek and post clarification of the issue for us James.
    I must admit that is the first time that I have seen reference to it being a loan item, I’ve only known it as an IWM exhibit.
    I guess really then that it comes down to the owner as to how it might be disposed and where it goes.
    Can anyone here say who does own it, is it DAS or a private owner?

    in reply to: Shackleton XF708 IWM Duxford #1073242
    pagen01
    Participant

    A long time Bruce, and for the first two types definitely worth it for their significance surely?

    in reply to: General Discussion #297552
    pagen01
    Participant

    He’s ‘mongst us, I can feel his presence!:)

    in reply to: Love him or hate him….. #1844350
    pagen01
    Participant

    He’s ‘mongst us, I can feel his presence!:)

    in reply to: Brooklands visit. #1073508
    pagen01
    Participant

    Actually the point I was making was not so much about trying to put everything under cover, though as seen in other threads this is getting more important – especially with such rarities such as the Viking and Swift, but more about actual presentation to the public.
    The oustide exhibits are rapidly gaining that ‘abandoned’ look of faded paint, and being parked on weedy and badly prepared surfaces, the Vanguard cockpit foraging amongst the weeds and the Concorde (?) section up against a wall is a bad look.

    I really do hate saying negative things like this as I know that good presentation demands heavy money and manpower requirements, and I do admire Brooklands for what they have on display etc, it is one of my favourite collections as it doesn’t feel restrictive or stuffy.
    We had a Bellman hangar (similar to Brooklands) rebuilt on site here, and the roof reinstatement alone came to £175,000, so I appreciate these matters aren’t cheap.

    in reply to: ME-262 first flight over Puget Sound #1073985
    pagen01
    Participant

    Very nice, seems to have gone a bit unoticed here!

    in reply to: Brooklands visit. #1074187
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks James, but you bad boy. There’s a big sign saying ‘PLEASE DO NOT CLIMB UP THE BANKING’.

    It was the only way I was going to snap these winged beauties!
    Not sure if you can see in the attachment but the driver of the Superbird is sat at quite an extreme angle!:eek:

    in reply to: Brooklands visit. #1074229
    pagen01
    Participant

    Looks like you had a great day out Rob, I love the Brooklands collection as it is something a bit different – however it really needs to get on top of its presentation style and show these rare airframes and componants off better. I suspect money, space, and manpower are against it.

    Is the Viking being outside a temporary measure?

    The angle of bank on the circuit really is something that can only be appreciated by climbing up it, those old racing drivers were very brave!

    in reply to: Faking Grips!! #1074234
    pagen01
    Participant

    The replicas actually look pretty good (including the F-16 one Ian), and if you accept them as that they are great for the mantle piece, in fact if I still had a Harrier cockpit I would proabably consider fitting it with a replica stick grip rather than the real thing, due to price, availability, and some one half inching the original one.
    I would like to see the early British jet replica stick tops up close as recreating the grip material is something that seems very hard to do when restoring an original.
    I still would only really want an original one as a stuffed and mounted collectors piece though, the whole point in having any of this stuff for me is the history behind the items.

    As Ian has said it would be great to see pictures of different stick tops here, could be a very usefull reference guide.:)

Viewing 15 posts - 2,896 through 2,910 (of 9,672 total)