dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft Control Wheels #1038646
    pagen01
    Participant

    Very nice additions, what’s the answer to your poser in post #72 then?

    oops double post:o

    in reply to: Jet Provost #1025507
    pagen01
    Participant

    Lovely illustrations there John!

    in reply to: Jet Provost #1039057
    pagen01
    Participant

    Lovely illustrations there John!

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1025512
    pagen01
    Participant

    Cardiff airport was significant because a Vulcan was scrapped there in the 1990’s…

    I might be missing humour here, but how on earth is that significant?
    Don’t quite get the Birmingham Airport or Cosford link either.

    Good to see that St Athan, which usually gets overlooked with flypasts, was taken into consideration, and really VTTS should be congratulated for even putting together a fly around like this.
    I’m wondering if another trip is planned for the former V bomber bases (and even dispersed airfields)?

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1039061
    pagen01
    Participant

    Cardiff airport was significant because a Vulcan was scrapped there in the 1990’s…

    I might be missing humour here, but how on earth is that significant?
    Don’t quite get the Birmingham Airport or Cosford link either.

    Good to see that St Athan, which usually gets overlooked with flypasts, was taken into consideration, and really VTTS should be congratulated for even putting together a fly around like this.
    I’m wondering if another trip is planned for the former V bomber bases (and even dispersed airfields)?

    in reply to: WF118 (569) at Gatwick Aviation Museum #1025568
    pagen01
    Participant

    Excellent news, do you still ground run any of the Sea Princes?

    in reply to: WF118 (569) at Gatwick Aviation Museum #1039121
    pagen01
    Participant

    Excellent news, do you still ground run any of the Sea Princes?

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1025895
    pagen01
    Participant

    taken by Paul Bonhomme over France while en route:

    1065:G-ASJV / MH434

    That’s a superb picture, loaded with the vision of a lonely pilot and Spitfire ready to engage the enemy over the rolling countryside of our green, sceptered isle*!

    *yes, I know it’s French countryside.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1039535
    pagen01
    Participant

    taken by Paul Bonhomme over France while en route:

    1065:G-ASJV / MH434

    That’s a superb picture, loaded with the vision of a lonely pilot and Spitfire ready to engage the enemy over the rolling countryside of our green, sceptered isle*!

    *yes, I know it’s French countryside.

    in reply to: Museo Aeronáutico de Maracay, Venezuela #1026153
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks for the pictures Darren, those Canberra ‘hoods’ do indeed look awful!

    in reply to: Museo Aeronáutico de Maracay, Venezuela #1039877
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks for the pictures Darren, those Canberra ‘hoods’ do indeed look awful!

    in reply to: Midland Air Museum,23/9/2012 #1026406
    pagen01
    Participant

    Is it me, or is there a ridge running around the Vulcan nose (& tail?), at the paint demarcation line?

    in reply to: Midland Air Museum,23/9/2012 #1040088
    pagen01
    Participant

    Is it me, or is there a ridge running around the Vulcan nose (& tail?), at the paint demarcation line?

    in reply to: When can we have them ? #1026871
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m wondering if xtangomike is angling for the historic perspective of the irony that Britain came up with the modern steam catapult and arrester sytems (along with angled deck and mirror landing sight) back in the early 1950s, yet we seem to be absolutely stubborn in not wanting to introduce carriers/aircraft with these systems that still works so well for the US Navy.
    The VTOL variant looks the most complicated, expensive, and least capable range/combat lift variant that we could go for.

    in reply to: When can we have them ? #1040613
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m wondering if xtangomike is angling for the historic perspective of the irony that Britain came up with the modern steam catapult and arrester sytems (along with angled deck and mirror landing sight) back in the early 1950s, yet we seem to be absolutely stubborn in not wanting to introduce carriers/aircraft with these systems that still works so well for the US Navy.
    The VTOL variant looks the most complicated, expensive, and least capable range/combat lift variant that we could go for.

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 9,672 total)