dark light

philo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 554 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sigma 50-500 zoom lens #2099563
    philo
    Participant

    Dammien what mount, how much ?

    in reply to: General Discussion #404069
    philo
    Participant

    Whilst I was sorry to hear of Bob Hope’s passing, I don’t think you could class him as a ‘Really funny man’, one of the finest ambassadors for entertainment yes, a man who was passionate about his fellow countrymen, a man who served his country and generally all round good egg, but funny no – not for me.
    May he rest in peace.
    The funniest man on this earth died last year, he’s now in the ninny nonny yang.

    in reply to: Bob Hope #1979164
    philo
    Participant

    Whilst I was sorry to hear of Bob Hope’s passing, I don’t think you could class him as a ‘Really funny man’, one of the finest ambassadors for entertainment yes, a man who was passionate about his fellow countrymen, a man who served his country and generally all round good egg, but funny no – not for me.
    May he rest in peace.
    The funniest man on this earth died last year, he’s now in the ninny nonny yang.

    in reply to: Sigma 50-500 zoom lens #2099829
    philo
    Participant

    Umm, I once had a Tamron ‘adaptall’ lens, 28-70 I think, and it was great. But this was in the days of Canon FD mounts and non-auto anything and my expectations were probably lower.
    I tried a big Tamron a couple of years back and sure it was cheap – it looked cheap, felt cheap and performance was, well lets say not fantastic. However I was using a Nikon 400 f4 and a Nikon 300 f2.8 at the time so my expectations were pretty high.
    If I was doing this for my crust there is no doubt that I would use nothing but Nikon prime lenses, but I’m not and I cant. Therefore I have to make compromises and having owned several Sigma lenes to date I believe that they offer excellent image quality at at reasonable price.
    It would be interesting to see what percentage of folks buy top brand bodies and then go for alternative lens manufacturers, I would hazzard at about 75%.
    Perhaps Nikon, Canon, Minolta there is some lesson to be learnt here. I work in an industry where we have the best product on the market (MRI) and our customers demand a year on year 5% price reduction, so effectively our products are half the price they were 10 years ago. Being the best does not mean you have to be the most expensive.

    in reply to: Sigma 50-500 zoom lens #2100208
    philo
    Participant

    Yep , thats what I thought.
    Do Nikon seriously want people to buy this ?
    I have just been searching around a bit for this new Sigma 80-400 OS and it would appear that hardly any dealers have it yet althought some are taking orders. I have just called Bristol Cameras who are generally the cheapest and they are aware of its existence but have no availablity dates or pricing as yet.
    I have seen it advertised at £899, I’m sure that this will be beaten. I have not seen any reports yet, but if its favourable I will be intersted in getting one.

    in reply to: Sigma 50-500 zoom lens #2100219
    philo
    Participant

    Of course there is always this one:-
    Latest News
    Nikon announces new Super Telephoto Zoom Nikkor with Vibration Reduction and Silent Wave Motor
    The first 2x super telephoto Nikkor lens to be fitted with both Vibration Reduction (VR) and Silent Wave Motor (SWM) is announced today. The AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 200-400mm f/4G IF-ED features a super telephoto zoom reach with the advantages of Vibration Reduction for increased photographic opportunities in low light.

    <<…OLE_Obj…>>
    The Vibration Reduction system offers up to three stops slower shutter speeds either in Normal Mode for hand held shooting or Active Mode when shooting from a moving platform. The VR system can also detect panning movement.

    The optical design includes 24 glass elements in 17 groups manufactured to the latest environmental standards. Four ED glass elements ensure sharp, high contrast results with film or digital. The picture angle is equivalent to 135 format focal lengths of 300mm to 600mm when used with a Nikon DX format Digital SLR, fast and quiet auto focus enabled by the incorporation of a Silent Wave Motor (SWM).

    The f/4 maximum aperture and overall length remain constant at all focal lengths and focus distances, and a new ‘Memory Set’ button close to the camera body, facilitates instant one touch focus re-set.

    Environmental protection has been attended to with rubber seals around the F mount bayonet and drop-in filter slot, and damage prevention has been improved thanks to a removable clear glass front element.

    Compatible with both TC-14E II and TC-20E II teleconverters.
    Weighing in at just 3200g, the lens is about 300g lighter than the AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/4D IF-ED II.
    The lens comes complete with hood (HK-30), shoulder strap (LN-1) and soft case (CL-L2).
    Expected availability October 2003, estimated price £5,499
    Posted on: Tuesday 22 July 2003

    in reply to: Sigma 50-500 zoom lens #2100279
    philo
    Participant

    Some interesting comments there chaps, I am about to purchase a new lens and have looked at the 50-500, 170-500 and the Nikon 80-400 VR (there is also a Sigma 135-400 which I know nothing about, no reports that I can find).
    I have discounted the 80-400vr, primarily on price, but also have a couple of friends using them and whilst they are happy with the performance they are not ecstatic.
    I have read several reports on the 170-500 and I don’t think it cuts the mustard.
    The 500-500 seems to come out top in my analysis, based on speaking with users, reading reports (one photo mag said ‘it was the best super zoom that they had ever tested’) and of course cost.
    There is a photo dealer in Bristol offering the 50-500 for £649.00, thats a very good price.
    However all this said, if Sigma are going to be releasing a VR version I might just wait, any ideas when and how much ?

    in reply to: Name a Plane #2102076
    philo
    Participant

    Eject Reject !

    in reply to: Is it just me ? #2102091
    philo
    Participant

    I’ve been to many IAT’s and RIAT’s as well and have to say there have been some excellent ones and some quite poor ones (2002 being a prime example).However, they have changed , no, become stale. The days when peole were clamouring at the fence because something unique or very rare was due in seem to have gone ( having said that , arrivals days still have the best atmosphere of the whole event). Remember the very first Bear arrival, fantastic, the speculation , the waiting, the constant scanning of the skies with bino’s, the SW radio messages, the delays and then there she was with escorts in all her glory – great times. The same goes for many other rare aircraft over the years, Backfire,F100,B2,B24, SR71 and so on.
    Its horses for courses and of course you dont have to go, but there is something for everyone, for instance Monday was great value for money , if you are intersted in watching take offs only that is (suited me as I take lots of record shots).

    in reply to: Is it just me ? #2102210
    philo
    Participant

    Brave man Plazz, brave man.
    I think you may have just stuck the old neck out a bit there, but hey theres nothing like lively debate is there.
    My understanding of RIAT is that it aims to make as much money for the RAFBE as possible by what ever means and I should imagine its pretty successfull in that respect.
    As for presenting modern airarms, not sure thats fully its mandate it has always contained an element of GA, historic , civil, display teams (far too many) and of course modern hardware. Yes the emphasis is toward modern military but thats probably because its at one of the only locations in the uK capable of staging such an event therefore it can cover a wider range.
    I dont think using ‘WWII left overs ‘ as a term is a smart move on this forum, still lets see who bites.
    Good luck
    Phil

    in reply to: RIAT security #2102212
    philo
    Participant

    Mark V,
    The barriers I was talking about were the ones around the park and view area, this was not closed so effectively the airfield was open to the outside world. I appreciate that the static areas were opened for aircraft movements.
    Roger,
    I took several shots of the french Hawkeye, assuming they are OK I’ll post one when I have them (still in the dark ages !)
    Phil

    in reply to: Happy Birthday Moggy C #2102215
    philo
    Participant

    Have a good one and have one for me, whatever it is your having !!

    in reply to: Maidstone flyover #2102219
    philo
    Participant

    Yes those 6 helos departed from RIAT yesterday, but thats not what I saw Saturday.

    in reply to: Contacting Flypast… #2103865
    philo
    Participant

    [email]flypast@keypublishing.com[/email]

    in reply to: What was your first Airshow? (Old thread ex 2003) #2104419
    philo
    Participant

    Mine was apparently Abingdon or Benson in 1958 ‘ At Home day’, I was about 4 months old. Sadly neither parents are alive to ask which but I do remember my dad telling me that I went in the same year that I was born.
    I went to virtually every Abingdon or Benson(they used to alternate) until Abingdon finished.

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 554 total)