Excellent news, let’s hope we see her in the UK soon. Am I right in thinking her only visit so far was Legends 2004?
I’m sure her last Dx visit was more recent than that, 2006 perhaps?? Either way, it would be nice to see her do a UK show or two again. Having looked at her summer schedule on the website, she looks like being pretty busy this year, although sadly there’s no mention of a UK visit.
I think the pic with the Manchesters would have been taken while Gibson was with 106sqn, so it pre-dates the raid by quite a bit.
Ah, thought it looked familiar, thanks. 🙂
Good stuff Brian, thanks for sharing. Great to see the new paint on the MiG, and that Monospar is a superb peice of work!
Anyone know where the Harvard came from? Is it the old bitsa that used to be at Harrington?
With the GR.9 in place, what are the plans for the GR.3?
Lovely stuff, thanks for sharing these. I love the weathering on the camouflaged Auster, nice to see a rough and ready finish.
What is NC8115, is it a WACO of some sort?
The Lysander in G-ASEA’s photo was restored and flown for a short time in the US in the 1970’s. She’s now displayed at NASM.
markb,
Yes, I realise such a thing is easier said than done, and that land and property prices are pretty ludicrous in the area. But at the same time I can’t help feeling that with a bit of co-operation between BAA and the airlines something along the lines of an aeropark might be possible. Check out Heathrow on Google maps and you’ll see there is still some open space near the airport perimeter, especially to the north and west.
I don’t know as it’s really all that bad old chap! Yes, I guess you could say the cafe’s prices are on the stiff side, but as to the rest I don’t think you’re being quite fair. First of all it’s still only March and alot of stuff is still tucked up or under winter maintenance, and secondly I would imagine visitor numbers are down slightly with one or two of the buildings being closed for renovation. It’s bound to be a bit quiet at the mo.
As for the engineers, well they’ve got jobs to do. I expect they’re glad of a bit of peace and quiet so they can get things done! On busy public days it’s all too easy to end up chatting and not do any work (I’ve not worked/volunteered at Dx, but the same principle applies at the steam museum I volunteer at!).
I know what you mean about things not quite being the same with OFMC, but they are still there with the Spit and P51.
All in all I’d say go back another day when the renovations are done and the weather is warmer, and then see what you think.
Certainly places like Brooklands, RAFM Hendon and the Science Museum are in London, but the latter two are national collections that happen to be in London, rather than being specifically related to A) London’s aviation history and B) the history of London’s airports. The collection at Brooklands relates mainly to that site in particular, with the Concorde earning its place there through Vickers’ manufacture of various Concorde components at Weybridge.
The madness of this situation is demonstrated by things like the movement of the Trident Three G-AWZK a few years ago (although I applaud the Trident guys for doing so). Why did it have to go to Manchester to go on display in the aeropark there? Why not a Heathrow aeropark at the very least, if not a full blown museum?
Here’s the link to the website of the organisation behind the plan, Club Concorde.
http://www.clubconcorde.co.uk/concorde_for_london.php
I looked at this website about a month ago, and the plans appear to have been completely revised. A month ago the plans showed the Concorde positioned along the bank of the river, rather than at a right angle to it and crucially the plans showed her INSIDE a glass building, rather than perched on this raft thing.
Personally I’m uneasy about it being displayed outdoors, yes it can be maintained but why do all that work over and over when you could stick a roof over it and not have to worry? Nature usually wins, outdoor airframe preservation is usually two steps forward and three steps back. I’d be happy to be proved wrong…
A very very very long shot this, but personally I’d like to see a kind of London Air Museum set up somewhere near Heathrow. With the likes of Heston, Hanworth, Hounslow Heath, Stag Lane etc not far away, it would be great to have a museum that covered London’s aviation history. I would like to see Concorde become a founding airframe in such a collection. Pipe dream I know, but it would be the best outcome.
If I remember rightly, the British Airways Heritage Collection holds a number of ATA records and other historical items, so it might be worth contacting them.
ATA page here:
http://www.britishairways.com/travel/history-ata/public/en_gb
Contact details for the collection here:
http://www.britishairways.com/travel/museum-collection/public/en_gb
The collection used to be displayed near Hatton Cross tube station, but recently moved to BA’s new Waterside HQ complex at Harmondsworth.
My intention is to make this my last post on this topic, as I don’t wish to draw this thread into a debate.
Whilst I understand that we’re all sorry, it’s my opinion that the loss of those on board is something which deserves focus. Discussion about the technicalities of the aircraft is secondary, if important at all. It is not my intention to appear sorrier than anyone else, or any such thing. It was a sad event without any doubt and it needs no emphasising, but nor does it need to be clouded by posts which refer solely to the aircraft.
I don’t wish to cause offence or unrest, the point I was trying to make is that the loss of life takes priority over the loss of the aircraft. My feeling is that discussion about which sub-type the lost aircraft was takes the focus away from what’s important.
Awful news, my thoughts go out to the family and friends. Whether or not it was an A-1E or an AD-4N is completely irrelevent in the circumstances, the aircraft isn’t important at times like these.