dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2153627
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    There will be more momentum for a new fighter program, aka PCA. But the 35 will certainly still pass the thousands airframe in case some are dreaming eyes wide open. I see the Navy more in trouble.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2153805
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    May I say that we have seen that even with the F104?

    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2153816
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Interesting that the EASA oppose both the Civil Aviation Authority and the one in charge of the Crash inquiry. They’d better be sure of their position otherwise the stain on its reputation could be damaging.
    The fact that Airbus procedures (test and preventive maintenance) seems to have been faulty does not preclude something good for an agency backing them unilaterally.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2153817
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Heavy planes of that type are difficult to make and a lot of know-how comes with airframer experience. There are structural work or hydrodynamics parameters that require plenty of attention.

    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2154809
    TomcatViP
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2154964
    TomcatViP
    Participant
    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2154990
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    I suspect that the USAF is throwing an ungodly number of dollars into some very old airframes because of three points, a) it has a huge frontal real estate, its entirely possible that the evolved Eagles will field the most capable radar in the entire USAF fast jet fighter fleet, b) high altitude flight performance and c) large aam cargo capability.

    There is also the necessary redundancy. As for an example, It’s not like a cyber war is still only Sci-Fi.

    in reply to: Let's bring back the Jag Grrrrrr #2155100
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Not only debatable (better systems than M2K-D ). Pure fantasy

    No (read BlackArcher post – we have also extensively debated the upgrade here before). When was the last time the 2K-d had a sensible system upgrade?

    @Fedakin: you might be too busy in RL as you clearly have read other posts and
    especially post 1 and subsequent much too fast to notice details that will have answered your remarks.
    The 2 squad are leased. All sustainent chain is from India. Only pilots are from each respective nation. Training is done in country, either with a couple of spare or via-pilot exchange. Think that with the new all-electric generation of pilot how good it will be to fly a demanding platform as the Jag. Security is achieved via med alt.

    Lease cover only time and amount of airframe needed and can include some discontinuities at the request of each party (this is why you trim down and don’t swap or phase out (read further down)). There are no aircraft induction in each respective countries.
    Cash flow at equivalent or superior effectiveness should be immediate. Spare Budget is then inserted in notional platform and fleet trimed down slightly to support the quick induction requested with the big Indian contract (quick fleet induction via leasing – full time – Uk/Ger/Ita lease T1, Fr lease upgraded M2K, Sweden lease Grip C).

    Where I was wrong was the deletion of the canons (read BlackArcher – Thank you b/w πŸ˜‰ ). I wasn’t sure and squared the angle.

    in reply to: Let's bring back the Jag Grrrrrr #2155559
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    What are the Grip generally doing among coalition… Reco.
    Same for Polish F16 πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: General Discussion #254668
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    May, today (in India):

    “As Britain leaves the EU, we’re determined not to turn our backs on the world but to forge a new, global, outward-looking role for ourselves,” May told the conference. “We know from history what happens when countries do not embrace the opportunities of the world. They stagnate. They get poorer. They don’t protect their people; they make them worse off.”

    in reply to: Let's bring back the Jag Grrrrrr #2155589
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    My country has already put 18 of them on the market, so Germany and Uk would come late anyway.

    IMHO Jaguar, although a very good plane, is together with the similarly valid Su-17, Kfir and Mirage V a category of military planes, the light supersonic striker a.k.a. zoomers, that has became IMHO completely obsolete and superseded by multirole fighters, so if it is for fighting Jihadis let’s go Su-25 /A-10 instead and for any other things Tornado or F-16.

    Also because , after losing the one of maneouvereability with the f-16D with tanks, someone we know cannot risk to lose also the one of low quote speed with Jag.:dev2:

    Indian Jag are cheap, less costly to operate and have relevant (and superior systems) than the 2Kd or even the Tornado. If we talk only about inducing more airframe to face pressure from Russia, the A2G aspect is dominant for Sweden with the Darin Jag well suited for the vast majority of it (use Jag for less demanding missions (expeditionary) and keep Grip as the bulk of your national defense + release old airframe from strategic stocks to augment the momentum of export, hence the available tech affordable with your national budget (ouch…).

    in reply to: Let's bring back the Jag Grrrrrr #2155603
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    For one, Fr pilots won’t be asked to do canon passes anyway… it’s way too risky and, as today’s politics dictate NOT to loose any crew by all possible means, they’ll be dropping guided bombs and if there are none left, simply go back to base to reload. Rafales have the canon and, unless you’ll forced to use it in air to air combat (basically, your missiles depleted and a bad guy still around trying to get you), they won’t ever use it as well

    Yes and next year, Dassault will roll out some old 152 (twin 20mmm)?

    in reply to: Let's bring back the Jag Grrrrrr #2155606
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    To lease… I would have thought that this was an English verb…

    Regarding Sweden, a Jag will still be relevant (flat country + expeditionary) with the twin seater performing advanced training task (LiF) in the waiting of the T-X.

    Think about it: Indian latest airframe, Indian maintenance contractor, Indian logistic… Now, please, go back to your accountancy spreadsheet and have a look at how much you can spare with such package for an increase in budget acquisition… And better export offer.

    I have talked before of integrated industry in length. This is somewhat the equivalent: Swap cost of ownership with acute training, coalition participation (hidden) and scale effect.

    in reply to: Let's bring back the Jag Grrrrrr #2155786
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    But I didn’t understand how the French AF would benefit from a Jag force..they’re upgrading their Mirage-2000Ds and those Mirages will be a more flexible and capable jet anyday.

    The 2kd is a terrain hugging aircraft with a TFR, a huge delta wing not suited for this type of OP and no… Canons. The latest Jag upgrade have radar, modern defensive and sensing suite plus… Canons. They have even a low alt optimized wing if it is ever needed.
    Imagine how happy might be the Fr pilots to be asked to do gun passes with an outdated canon… Podded.

    The intend of this thread is purposely to show how a defense policy somewhat articulated around an industrial lead to counter-productive losses, discontinuity in coherence, increased exposure of personals to risk, budget impasse or even exports potential decrease… And to have some fun πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Let's bring back the Jag Grrrrrr #2155846
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    The latest Jag upgrade for India is slightly more capable than what the AdA have with the 2Kd (it’s true that Weapon usage will still be a problem for Fr)

    India Rafale buy is oriented toward strategic deterrence and A2A. More available Mirage airframe could help secure the next deal (the 2Kd is similar to the 2kN minus some systems – the 2N is being phased-out).

    Available Typhoon MkI will help secure the next IAF buy. Their lack of readily upgradable system for A2g makes then redundant to UK and Germany. I am sure both AF will see the swap as a win-win strategy. IAF could gain immediately a potent defense picket able to complete their MKI force.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 5,621 total)