page 24
and two pages below…
since the ranges were extreme, the Mirages and Daggers were unable to exploit their tactical advantage of speed.
High and fast is theoretical. Never were the Mirages able to exploit this tactic IRL on the theatre.
I think this point was already cleared with the RFI published some month ago Would be good to go through the old thread.
And why does we have to have this new one ?
So you do think that you buy an F-35 without ever trying it? Just like an icecream?
China is working on a new fighter jet for aircraft carriers to replace its J-15s
We also learned about the impact on the fleet:
According to a report in the South China Morning Post, quoting Chinese air force lieutenant general Zhang Honghe, a βnew carrier-based fighter to replace the J-15β is in development.
The report goes on to add that the type, a Chinese copy of the Sukhoi Su-33, has been involved in four crashes and suffers a range of mechanical problems. At one point, this resulted in the entire fleet being grounded four three months.
Source:
FlightGlobal.com
Era settles H225 helicopter lawsuit for $42 million
In a stock exchange filing, Era says that the agreement settles all litigation against the manufacturer without either party admitting liability. Airbus Helicopters will pay $42 million in cash, as well as giving certain trade credits lasting for five years.
Although regulators eventually cleared the 11t rotorcraft for service following the implementation of a number of safety measures, most offshore operators have kept their fleets idle.
Era had claimed that Airbus Helicopters had sold the H225s with the full knowledge of a safety issue with the main gearbox.
Also
Norwegian investigators recommend H225 gearbox redesign
“The investigation has shown that the combination of material properties, surface treatment, design, operational loading environment and debris gave rise to a failure mode which was not previously anticipated or assessed.”
[β¦]
In its sole recommendation aimed at the manufacturer, SHT recommends that “Airbus Helicopters revise the type design to improve the robustness, reliability and safety of the main gearbox in the AS332 L2 and EC225”.
Airbus Helicopters is unlikely to undertake a wholesale redesign of the main gearbox for the Super Puma line, but will instead bring incremental changes to the component.
[β¦]
In addition, EASA was equally at fault, it says: “In summary, Airbus Helicopters and EASA did not successfully manage to realise the safety potential from the G-REDL accident report.”
Noting that the failure of a single component caused the catastrophic failure of the main gearbox and subsequent loss of the main rotor, SHT also recommends that EASA develop a main gearbox certification specification to prevent such a situation occurring on future designs.
Source:
That would be interesting to know at which occasion they did flew fast and high.
Low power and drag of a delta wing in sustained turn.
Now you see how the Harrier made it in the Malvinas/Falklands π
Technically, given the said 200kg explosive contained on the head o the missile… It has some stronger armor than a T-90. So how do you say rolling front line in Lockmart‘s pidgin?
Really? 30 deg AoA and 9g?!
Not a single journalist dared to write an article in any russian speaking website or newspaper about these?
May I suggest this to correct your typo?
Don’t be so hard. 6th gen is marketing bs obviously but more at the attention of taxpayers that were told for years that’s stagnation was the new pinnacle of moving forward and 5th gen was LM propaganda. Now they want to build something that will stand a chance to better the then old f-35: a 5th+ gen aircraft called a 6th gen not to embarrass anyone*.
Last, I wonder how BAE and Saab will re conciliate the expectations drafted in a UK/Japan cooperation: a large fighter is not a nimble low cost one. So, expect two different airframe (and some great synergies!) or an announcement that the joint UK/Japan effort is… Dead.
*until it can prove to be a true dogfighter, for sure we can call it a dodge one!
While Boeing and Embraer agreed to form a joint venture for their civil airliners (80% Boeing, 20%Embraer, 4.8b$), A new joint venture for Embraer military products is to be formed:
In addition, Boeing and Embraer will deepen a sales and services partnership on the new KC-390 military cargo jet with another joint venture to promote and develop new markets and applications for defense products and services, they said.
Source:
CNBC.com
Thanks ActionJackson.
@Mercurius: I am totally on the same opinion. sadly, this is a trend widely found all across the internet’a forums where the expertise and time lost to ensure the quality of the thread is often disregarded in front of other priorities. Internet (and this is paradoxal) widely disregard IP question.
[…] the shocking admission of program failure by Russian officials.
When was that?! I last read about the order of 12 Airframe.