yeah, what ever happened to Vortex, GarrayB, Tempest, and SealordLarry?
those were some interesting people.I heard PLA got upgraded to a new version and Hamburger updated into a combo meal.
Ah yes, good old days and some names well remembered there. but won’t go off-topic on it too much. No, PLA never got upgraded to a new version, he still visits but doesn’t have an ID. Common lore goes that the Hamburger turned into a Chinese Hot-something. About Otaku, that’s a shame and a big loss. I seriously doubt though that he was a she.
Have you guys seen the F-35 S/VTOL competitor from China? Or the single engined light fighter model being thrown around? Wonder how mature those are compared to this J-20. Technically, a cheaper lighter single WS-15 engine based plane should be relatively simple and hassle free for China and Pakistan may also choose to chip in.
I’m actually very happy with the new members, a real boon for the forum, definitely better than a lot of the less competent (and more vocal) old members. Although definitely miss all the good old members from a few years ago that left – Flex, SOC, PLA, F-18Hamburger, crobato and more.
I think we have a new Chinese friend from the CCCP. I definitely agree with him, if I get the time will write something about how the J-20 and PAKFA are not competitors against each other but responses against NATO / US imperialism and that there is much to be said for a continued partnership between Russia and China.
I don’t think there is a weapons bay yet, although for sure the space for it is there.
http://twitter.com/Rory_Medcalf
seems to be reporting live in English?
yep, my man down in Chengdu gives a green light. 😀
sun is out.
It’s on!
we’re waiting for the pictures, tell him to get some please. 🙂
I think S-300 plays a huge card in international affairs. Probably second to a nuclear strike capability. Funny, a defensive weapon, i know.
I honestly believe so. For example, take this: Would USA be more concerned over Iran getting S-300s or having a good stealth fighter plane? Defensively speaking, I’d go with S-300s if I was Iran. It is a lot easier to get full effectiveness of S-300 than proper integration of a stealth plane.
Now, Russia knows how popular and feared S-300 is. It has been raising arguments for last 15 years over who is possibly getting it, and who isn’t. All the more power to Russia. How much did they benefit so far simply from NOT selling it to certain countries!
Could it be possible that Russia created a DIY ( do it yourself) S-300 “kit” in form of information package, which they sold to North Korea and Iran for them to build. It would be somewhat less potent S-300 system, but within same category. (if they think they can)
Could this be what we are seeing in Iran and North Korea?
just a though.
cheers
Very interesting point. I think that Iran and NK are sure to be cooperating in this sector. I also think that a LR-SAM is not that big a leap for the Iranians who build the Mersad, an upgraded Hawk system (full system that includes every sub-system and is digitized) which has increased range. Simply scaling up many of the systems of the Mershad could give them a LR-SAM. With more input from backdoor S-300s and cooperation with NK, they are sure to be either already fielding something or on the verge of.
Between, if SOC is figuring out were the few S-300s Iran has acquired would be stationed, there is something to there being S-300s. Remember that SOC is after all USAF intelligence no matter how much he claims his work is open source, he wouldn’t put this kind of stuff out if he thought it was bull.
@TJ thank you for your opinion and the opinion of government officials from an Easter European country. Let’s agree to disagree on this.
Did you mean J-20 Tiny?
SOC suggests Iran may have S-300PTs
http://geimint.blogspot.com/2008/03/iran-and-s-300pt.html
Open-source reporting indicates that Iran has purchased the S-300PT SAM system from Belarus. The S-300PT will represent the most modern, advanced SAM system in Iran when it is operationally deployed.
PS: Iran’s improved Hawk missiles (not a fantasy or a cooked up story by any account. well known to informed observers).
http://uskowioniran.blogspot.com/2010/04/mersad-air-defense-system.html
A really solid assessment from the comments section from above:
This is a good point defense system on which the Iranian armed forces have had extensive experience since the first HAWK (MIM23) battery was delivered in 1970’s. Earlier Iranian HAWKs had ground clutter and electronic problems due to the climate, but most of the kinks had been taken out by the end of Jange Tahmili. The HAWKS were successful in bringing down a number of Iraqi planes despite shortage of spares and difficulty in maintaining the complex AN/MPQ-50 PAR radars. Iran digitized its newer home made HAWKs with MTI (Moving Target Indicator)and better ECM systems developed from battle experience. Deployed in large numbers and integrated into the newly installed fibre optic early warning air defence grid, these Mersads (improved domestic HAWKS) will be a formidable weapons system.
Iran has modified the systems with better radar coverage, electronics and longer range. Some analysts estimate that it is comparabe to the TOR1 (SA15) in Iranian inventory.
S-200s and improved hawks:
http://uskowioniran.blogspot.com/2008/05/irans-s-200-and-hawk-sam-systems.html
China’s HQ-9 is rumored to have an anti-stealth capability – I believe something like a Vera sub-component.
Iran very possibly does have a limited number of S-300s –
http://defensetech.org/2010/08/04/iran-claims-it-has-obtained-s-300-air-defense-missile-system/
Guess which pal of Iran got the S-300s Iran was supposed to buy?
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/06/17/hugo_chavez_picks_up_irans_s_300_missiles_0
Iran is noted to have a few S-300s from alternative sources as well. These may be placed at the most important sites like Natanz, etc. That is perhaps something to consider in your analysis Wanderlei. Not to mention upgraded Hawk SAMs and a ton of other weapons many of them probably not known to the international community; chinese sams, bits-and-pieces sams cobbled together from various sub-systems sneaked in from a wide variety of places, NK variants of older sams and more. They are packing everything into those high value targets specially in the western regions of Iran.
PS: Iran is not Syria, they are a completely different ball game. They are far more professional, serious, battle hardened and simply competent than the Syrians who were so lazy that they would place their sams in valleys rather than on the top of hills simply because they hated digging latrines. Fact to remember, Iran trains Hezbollah, the lightly armed and numerically few force that recently sent 30,000 of Israel’s best soldiers packing.
PPS: Also, Natanz is not the only fuel enrichment plant. Smaller pilot plants are available. For all that is known, there may be “many” small ones. We are talking abou uranium-based weapons here and not plutonium based. Uranium based systems can be built in small distributed buildings spread throughout the country without a large plant. A plutonium based system like Pakistan however can’t do the same. The tradeoff however is the uranium based systems can never be as powerful, small and well, “usable” as plutonium based systems.
PPPS: Some Muslims are expecting a nuclear attack. It’s in some of our revelations: The Prophet (peace be upon him) talks about a “Blast” with a “devastating sound” that will “awaken the one who is asleep and knock down the standing” and which will appear as a “sign in the sky, a bright pillar of light”. see here. Conventional bunker busters may be of limited effect against the class of bunkers used and Israel may use “tactical nukes”. Even with conventional weapons the radiation spread would be significant.
Well, again, i don’t have much to support any info on Iran. That’s why i made this thread as I’m interested in what others think, or know.
This Wiki link states 88+10 Mig-29s (first i came across)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_of_the_Iranian_Air_Force#cite_note-waf-1This Wiki link states 44 Mig-29s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_Air_ForceI’m a bit surprised that this is not more known to public.
Here is the globalsecurity take on the Iranian gear:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/airforce-equipment.htm
No, it came across as if you personally called an iranian embassy and warned them. that was what i found odd.
Buran, if Iran did that again, it would provide even more reason for the US to explain ‘operation iranian freedom’
And the regime is unpopular, and I’m sure the catastophic mistakes of Iraq wont be repeated.
= more oil, more safety in the gulf etc etc
I think you are mistaken about whether everyone on this thread shares your opinion on such matters or not. As for what I may or may not do, I guess that is barely appropriate for you to be commenting on and finding “odd” or otherwise. There are certainly a lot better ways than merely calling up their embassy. Noting the Mod’s warning I’ll leave it at that.
What the?
are you joking or what?
Israel could easily beat Irans air defences(not without loss, but not hard), and strike a target easily. I expect as much soon on their nuke sites.
Dear F-111buff26, I think we both agree that Irans defenses will not last long. Did I come off as otherwise.
@Wanterlei, you’re most welcome, I think there will be very little warning and will involve limited strike (Israel cannot hope to cover Iran properly) but this will trigger a chain of responses that will get the US involved in “neutralizing” Iran. But that’s just all in my head right now, and glad it is! Those old F-14s and rest are not worth much IMHO against fully upgraded and updated F-16s and F-15s, knowing particularly how much the Israelis know of the kit Iran is using. J-10s would be nice, I’ve advocated those for Iran publicly, ASAP. Anything, even J-7Gs. We are talking about saving 10s of thousands of Iranian lives but it beats me why they are so heedless.
Seating for two is a good idea. Firstly, there are several aircraft carrier groups in the sea thereabouts, numerous other naval forces, several neighbouring countries and lots of oil shipping! Two seats means the pilot can stick to flying and some spotting, and the back seat guy can do communications with nearby vessels, additional visual search and navigation. Most SAR assets have more than just one person in them.
True, flying these may have a rather heavy workload for the pilot.