dark light

PLA-MKII

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • PLA-MKII
    Participant

    thanks everyone for your comments. Maybe I’ll be selling vodka for all I know 😀

    in reply to: Israel plans to attack Iran nuke site #2528977
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    PLA-MKII’s Hypothesis of the Pentagon Crash:
    (based on speculation and speculation only)

    The airliner got shot by a missile and blew up before impacting the building. But because of kinetic momentum the debris struck the building. The missile was a tail shot and the the front section made that small hole in the pentagon. This also more palatably explains why the engine fell a mile away. Because of public sensitivities the government did not want to say this. Not much of a conspiracy, and makes operational sense – those people would have died anyways.

    It is interesting how “balanced” SOC used to be, but I guess as the objects of controversy come closer to heart. There is something obviously shady about the 9/11 event, but to deny that our patriotic keypub fellowship would rather put their heads in a sandbox. Its your country you know, you need to find out what happened and why. You need to find out how much the spent on investigating the event and how much was spent hunting Clinton down. You need to figure out why Clinton was hunted and by whom. You need to figure out who murdered JFK and then his brother, and why. You need to find how much funding AIPAC has and how much of it is going to whose pockets – this at least is readily available data.

    in reply to: Israel plans to attack Iran nuke site #2530025
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    If it is so, you are right. France and Israel started their atomic programs in the 50s. Till the mid 60s the situation was much different and the official Washington very critical about Israel.

    Yes, untill Kennedy was murdered by guess who? 😮

    Lyndon Johnson immediately made a full u-turn in the policy, and you might want to google “Lyndon Johnson” and “Jewish” to find out more. 😮

    in reply to: PAK-FA updated info, anyone? #2530374
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I like the T designations. Makes them sound like a new version of the terminator 🙂

    How about recycling the Su-1. Would be a great marketing ploy me thinks

    in reply to: China Tests Anti-Satellite Weapon #2530574
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    This has huge significance vis-a-vis a US intervention in the Taiwan Straits. Perhaps more than the chinese AEGIS or the new submarines. I think this is the last piece in chinese armory that defeats US supremacy in any military exchange in Taiwan. The extent to which the US military today is dependent on is sattellite network is truly amazing and a vital weakness.

    in reply to: Israel plans to attack Iran nuke site #2531514
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Instead of attacking flex, you fellows might want to look to your fellow american Jimmy Walter, a patriotic american, a democrat and a philanthropist who spends millions on helping other people. He wants the 9/11 investigation reopened and (even though he is white and a patriotic american) has been badgered and harassed by US authorities. At one point he actually had to leave the US to stop harassment. You can find out more about him at jimmywalter.com

    his reopen 9/11 website has recently been “taken down” and is not working. You might also want to note that he has offered $1 million to a scientific explanation of how the buildings came down, not the political nonsense. So, in case any of you are up to it and really believe the official story and want to collect on your patriotism, you might want to give a scientific paper on it a shot.

    9/11 is intrinsically connected to the coming attack on Iran. If you want to believe a “conspiracy theorist” like me, so was removing John Murtha and putting in his place a AIPAC stooge. If you want to really go all the way back to Eisenhower and his primary backer Baruch. And later the assassination of the Kennedys. But I don’t want to waste my time on the american “PII” type bunch here.

    Believe what you want to believe, just leave us alone 🙂

    in reply to: Israel plans to attack Iran nuke site #2531530
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    You genuinely believe there is no such organisation as Al-Qaeda?

    No, flex doesn’t mean that, but that the al-qaeda you know is a completely different animal from the one he is talking about.

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2535015
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Okay, no S-300s, no MiG-31s, hmm no F-8IIs either

    Couple of old tomcats with funky looking SAM converted missiles.. a few F-4s, F-5, MiG-29s and Su-24s. No known BVR missiles. Maybe a handful of pheonixs.

    What have they been doing for the last 17 years?

    in reply to: Baghdad-1 (Adnan-1) AEW aircraft #2535018
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I remember a recent picture here from google earth showing her parked in a derelict spot with an engine missing (?), perhaps spares. I would think it would be good to have her operational at this point for Iran.

    PS: are you really Kate Winslets sex toy?:D

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2535407
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Its surprising how so many here are so sure that Iran doesn’t have S-300s. Remember that Syria officially never bought the S-300 but is known to possess it. The matter is a point of controversy.

    “Iran’s status regarding the S-300 system remains controversial. They seem to have acquired an unknown number of S-300PMU-1 missiles in 1993, maybe even recently from Belarus.[14]”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SA-10_Grumble

    Oh well, nobody seems willing to look at piecing together a scenario.

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2536364
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I am bringing this thread back in light of recent events. Please feel free to let your imagination run with two possible scenarios:

    Israel attacks Iran with tacit US / British / French support

    Free for all – US / British / Hooter Girls / Israel attack Iran.

    Lets build a REALISTIC scenario from the ground up. I will take back my MiG-31 theory to keep it real. S-300s though should be added, as these are very likely present in Iran. Lets take 50 odd F-14s with BVRAAMS, and have the MiG-29s with BVRs as well. No J-10s though 🙁
    F-4s fully upgraded to a BVR platform. F-5s play point defence without BVRs (sitting ducks). On the ground, everything from Iglas to TorM1s to a few S-300s. Hardened shelters.

    Possible side scenarios – straits – closing of the persian gulf or attempt to do so.
    retaliatory strike, both by air and by land. missile strike on israel. Lets make it nice and fun.

    in reply to: Israel plans to attack Iran nuke site #2536376
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    😀 what where you watching, pass it on now 😀

    in reply to: Israel plans to attack Iran nuke site #2536387
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    PLA-MKII’s lesson in media propaganda 101:

    Did the Iranian president actually say “wiped off the map”? Apparently it was a “translation error” (or deliberate propaganda)

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12790.htm

    for those of you who do not believe please take the original text of his speech in persian and go to the nearest university and have it translated. or try babelfish.

    this “mad man” never said “wiped off the map” at all. 😮

    in reply to: Israel plans to attack Iran nuke site #2537409
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Well if it is as successful as it was last time then it’ll be a neat solution to the problem.

    Wow, I can’t believe people like you exist. Duke Nuk’ems galore.

    in reply to: Code Name for the J-10 Any Takers? #2539055
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    lol I know that but I can’t think of anything cool left with an F 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 1,462 total)