dark light

Rocketeer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 4,649 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Divorced from reality ! #1249903
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    I thought only aviation enthusiasts frequented this forum not sadists!! 😮
    We are talking about the oldest surviving 748 here my boy!!!

    Quite, and trust me as a taxpayer too, you all got full value from this particular aircraft.

    in reply to: Late Seafire Request Experts Please #1250128
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    A shot of some stuff for the project, more to follow

    in reply to: Late Seafire Request Experts Please #1252957
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Already been there David.

    I am aware of the aircraft remains to which you refer. The semi cockpit section is a small part of the whole, and the rest of the aircraft is a significantly bigger chunk. I, like Peter, have seen it.

    There is a replica Spitfire XVI at Flixton, that uses the external skins of TD248. Thats quite a significant chunk of aircraft. However, the provenance of the aircraft shows a clear path – RAF, Eddie Coventry, Historic Flying resto, Eddie Coventry, Karel Bos, Spitfire Ltd. The skins parted at some point, but it is clear where the title to the aircraft lies. The same is true of the Seafire section. Its a nice piece, but if you used it to resurrect a Seafire, there would be so little original in it, it would be insignificant.

    Bruce

    I would agree. The seafire lump is and always will be described as the cockpit of cos that is what it is. It could never be a claim for title or ownership of that tail number. So call the cockpit part what it is.

    in reply to: Late Seafire Request Experts Please #1253516
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Have you any pics of the high back Rocketeer that you can share with us??

    wilco soon old chap…..
    busy on frame 11……
    oh btw Stuart G you are a cheeky chappy! 😉

    in reply to: Ten Aircraft of Your Choice In 1946 #1254717
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Nice thread!
    1. Spitfire Prototype
    2. Hurricane Prototype
    3. Hampden
    4. My Grandad’s 210 Sqn M for Monkey Catalina
    5. Whitley
    6. Martin Baker MB5
    7. Miles Master
    8. Do17
    9. Prototype Wellington (sorry crashed v early)
    10. Blackburn Botha….

    in reply to: Late Seafire Request Experts Please #1255087
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Thanx for the info Mark12 me old…..I shall post a piccie of my 1/72nd scale model of a Seafire….dunno where you got the idea of anything else! True I have a Frame 5 to 13 Spit high back fus in construction….how is Mr C getting on with his project?

    in reply to: A daddy again…. #1255103
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Congratulations Bruce…..all the best people have two daughters!!

    in reply to: Staggerwing tip-up #1261410
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    snip “Test pilots” and their experience. They can have all the experience in the world, but if its not on type, they’re no better than the rest of us, a number of very experienced test pilots have bent some very precious aeroplanes over the last 15 – 20 years or so, lets not put them on a pedastal.

    snip

    mick

    Someone has already said that it has nothing to do with the CAA….I never put Test Pilots on a pedestal (and I, as a FTE, work with them!). However, a true test pilot has been through a recognised flight test school (Such as ETPS, which as you may know, is the oldest test pilot and flight test engineer school in the world). You are right, there is no substitute for experience on type, however, if an aircraft needs a flight test or check out, who would you prefer to put in it, a pilot with little or no experience on type or a test pilot? Put simply, if a job needs to be done that requires a calibrate pilot, the test pilot is the chap for the job. Dont forget the FTE though! Aeroplane Monthly’s memorial to test pilots does not seem to remember the countless FTE/FTOs that have been lost too….rant over!

    in reply to: Staggerwing tip-up #1264297
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Idle speculation chaps….not really a subject to have a crack at the CAA is it?

    BTW, qualified test pilots have huge experience and good knowledge of the system under test, but they are human with all that brings. I wish I could look at all the twists and turns in my life and say I was never at fault.

    I heard a rumour that it was being flight tested at the time by a CAA Test Pilot…….! 😮

    Brings a whole new meaning to Miles McCallum’s article in a recent edition of Flyer magazine about CAA test pilot’s if it’s true!

    Anyone know any details?

    in reply to: What Price our Heritage – Now Reduced? #1264301
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    It is a nice sign….sure it is quite new, but in the 1970s there were some pretty exciting and historic aircraft flying for the RAF and at Tangers….

    I’ll give your Debden sign a home old fruit!!

    in reply to: Most beautiful jet #1267155
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    F1 Hunter, followed by F4 Hunter (early F1’s were beautifully clean without the aerodynamicist’s ‘hoovers’ to sort out probs such as airbrakes, notched L.E and gun deflectors).

    in reply to: Mystery canopy ID #1267171
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    early swift? it is certainly supermarine with the white ‘tape’

    in reply to: Mystery canopy ID #1267335
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    It looks very like my Swift canopy (wellnot my actual one as that is on 113)

    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1270066
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Wot time did you arrive Stu?! Did not see your country bumpkin red cheeks and fair locks at all!!

    I enjoyed the event (as always) good opportunity to meet up and chat….good amount of stuff for sale…a few bargains…roll on the next one!

    in reply to: Rectangular RAF Blind Flying Panel #1281690
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Downland also do them…..one may be for sale on their stall at Shoreham, they are laser cut and about £48

Viewing 15 posts - 3,961 through 3,975 (of 4,649 total)