dark light

Rocketeer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,976 through 3,990 (of 4,649 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mustang "Merlin's Magic"mangled mess #1281695
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    As I put in the Hoover thread, this team had so much sad luck this week…the Merlin was ‘cut in half’ by the flailing con rod (after the piston went AWOL).

    in reply to: Last Shoreham….Possibly!! #1285025
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    It would be sad to see the event disappear. I have attended every event at Shoreham, Fontwell and before at Tangmere except one! It is a great social event. I would love it to relocate to Brooklandds. Indeed Andy this would probably entice more people to stall out (and buyers too) from the north. Another possibly venue could be Abingdon or Bicester. It was also popular at Old Sarum….

    I am still out on Ebay, it seems a club we have to belong to as a collector etc, but it is not always great.

    in reply to: Who is that man?….Bob Hoover! #1285585
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Nice photo, Mark12 – N6519D (then owned by Leroy Penhall) actually is the ‘stop-gap-aircraft’ after N2251D was heavily damaged in an O2-bottle explosion at Oshkosh in 1970 – N6519D was used for a rather short time only until the real replacement a/c for N2251D, i.e. N51RH “Ole Yeller” built up by Cavalier in Sarasota FL in 1971 was ready.

    Martin

    Those air/oxy systems are a real pain. I really felt for the Merlin’s Magic P51 team at Reno this year…..their race Merlin chopped itself in half (but for the heads) on Tuesday…the team worked so hard to get her other engine fitted. They qualified well and then the bottle exploded on Thursday and damaged the rear fuz. I felt so sorry for them.

    in reply to: Raspberry ripple Andover, what are they used for? #1300262
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Guzzineil the whistle of them Darts is not nice if they’re just outside your office, whilst at the same you are coughing due to the the 111 starting up, blowing its efflux through the gaps in the window frames. The noise is so loud you can’t hear the Harvard in the circuit!!!

    Stop whinging you sound like one of those confounded adminers in my building!! They are always whining about the gazelles – funny that as aviation is the reason they have a job!! Tee hee!! 🙂 Now I will need to try and work out who you are!!?? 😀

    in reply to: Raspberry ripple Andover, what are they used for? #1301306
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Isn’t there one for sale on one of the disposal sites? Think it might be this one.

    there is one for sale yes but not this puppy

    in reply to: Raspberry ripple Andover, what are they used for? #1301681
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Still earning her keep…beautiful aircraft. She is quite instrumented for exercises as well as being a good transport. Great fun STOL!

    in reply to: Bf 109 found 20ft under #1305375
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Very interesting. Also interesting to see that the tyres were still marked Dunlop on such a late machine.

    in reply to: Alan Brown #1307516
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    That is very sad Andy. He helped me with many things over the years. My condolences to his family too.

    in reply to: Museum find identification help please #1307525
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    AH5048 is a Hurri wheel and the others as Alan says

    in reply to: A moral dilemma #1308705
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    leave them as is. I fly as a crew and if this sort of thing happened it would be better to stay as a crew.

    in reply to: Bader – The TV Programme #1310585
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Welcome back Dilip.

    Just a thopught – Tiffy’s lost their tails regularly as we know. Mostly people immediately had their nexks broken by the shock (ie the pendulum efect Rocketeer mentioned). Question is, how did they fall? This may or may not give some clue – different a/c and a lot heavier, but….

    I have a air crash AP that goes into the Typhoon tail fall off case (together with details of about 60 of them)…there are photos of the wreckage so I will have a looksy.

    There is bespoke software for recreating final events following an inflight failure etc, however, it requires input data (i.e. from a flight recorder or ‘good’ dataset of witnesses). The only thing we can be sure of is that the aircraft went in vertical, penetration would depend on the final impact speed, and any rolling action and of course the ground make up. It should be fairly easy to estimate terminal velocity.

    Anyway, this is all no doubt ‘teaching GM to suck eggs’ and fairly obvious….I have to go and play with modern aircraft now….first day back after 2 weeks off!

    Stay friendly and keep the reasoned debate going….it is great and I feel a very worthy subject. Unlike ‘traditional’ archaeologists, aviation archaeologists have the golden opportunity of knowing much more before a dig begins. Using traditional tools can be pointless, however, I have been known to use very small trowels! Often we can pinpoint the attitude of crash and much more (even damage that brought the aircraft down) so this clearly fills gaps in the ‘evidence’, but most of all we remember brave airman when others forget.

    One last thought, I used to be against digging crashes until a friend took me to the crash of a Mosquito lost on the day before VE Day, there was so little to know where they had fell and died, just a tiny indentation in a field. If we do not remember them….who will? These sites are being lost under fields developed to create new urban sprawls and roads.

    This thread has also brought two great aviation historians closer together again and that can only be good.

    PS A mini Forum meet at the Shoreham Aerojumble 30th Sept and a toast to fallen heros may be a nice idea.

    Cheers Tony Dyer

    in reply to: Bader – The TV Programme #1310771
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Is there anyone who could use computer software to simulate a Mk V Spitfire losing it’s tail and the likely outcome to the airframe in the air?

    Did Bader at any stage confirm he was flying inland when he got clobbered?

    The loss of the tail would cause the centre of gravity to move forward with an obvious pitch nose down (engine would cause pendulous effect). If sufficiently violent, the engine could be ripped off the bulkhead and cause the wing to just flutter down turning end over end. More likely, the engine remained attached as the chance of bailing out would be greatly reduced. it would then dove in almost vertically.

    in reply to: Bader – The TV Programme #1310781
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Being hit in the face by all that wind could have accounted for his bloodshot eyes. I have seen skydivers who have lost their goggles in the air come back looking rather red.

    Ali

    I was chatting to a chap at work a few years back who had ejected from a Casa 101 about a week before – I could not make eye contact as his eyes were completely blood shot with no white at all….wind blast/visor up or forced up.

    in reply to: Bader – The TV Programme #1310901
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Fascinating thread one and all!
    My favourite part was Allison’s offer of a ‘sub bottom profiler’ – I am intrigued as to what that could be!! Indeed my mind boggles in a rather perverse way! 😀 😮

    Cheers Tony Dyer

    in reply to: Could this be the end of flying at Duxford? #1312825
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    I have tried but cannot add an objection…has the time limit ended? Already contacted MPs etc!!

Viewing 15 posts - 3,976 through 3,990 (of 4,649 total)