dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: whats stopping 'just jane' being a flyer?? #1385513
    Mark V
    Participant

    So if BAE will not provide design support for the Shakleton in the UK (and hence the absence of the type here) does this also apply to a G registered flying Lancaster? has anyone asked them?

    No I am not knocking them btw, its up to them whether or not they want to support any type.

    in reply to: Hendons B-17 #1386146
    Mark V
    Participant

    Spitfires MJ772 and MK923 (recently flyable – now in Museums in Oshkosh and Seattle respectivley).

    in reply to: Robs Lamplough's Mustang – any news? #1386149
    Mark V
    Participant

    ‘Miss Helen’ suffered an engine failure near the owners home strip after displaying at RAF Fairford in July. She was force landed, gear up, in a nearby field. Pilot was unhurt, aircraft had the usual damage associated with this kind of incident.

    in reply to: New toys for TFC? (Old thread updated 2016) #1386297
    Mark V
    Participant

    I think Robants and Firebirds points are thought provoking. In quite a few instances these machines today really are ‘playthings’, albeit quite serious playthings. It is certainly not the case in every instance that they are restored and operated as memorials to the original wartime crews. This is not necceassarily a good thing but, at the end of the day, if the motivation to spend a great deal of money to restore a warbird comes purely from the desire to just fly and enjoy the thing I would guess few of us would object.

    in reply to: 'Pool table' flying in the Rocky Mountains! #1387633
    Mark V
    Participant

    No excuse offered for posting this again (TB863 – Wanaka 2004)

    in reply to: Interesting A-2 Jacket #1396821
    Mark V
    Participant

    Steve, fantastic jacket – next time your over you should bring it with and re-unite it with Old Buckenham!

    in reply to: Spitfire Cockpit Section #1398626
    Mark V
    Participant

    Cheers Dave!

    in reply to: rivets – chisel or drill? #1398643
    Mark V
    Participant

    I have always used a drill of the same size as the rivet (1/8, 3/32 or whatever) but stopped drilling just short of the tail of the rivet so that I do not open up the holes in the skin. The head then snaps off with the application of the pin punch. I admit it takes accurate drilling to do this and you need to be drilling dead centre on the head.

    in reply to: Spitfire Cockpit Section #1398661
    Mark V
    Participant

    Sorry Dave – that was my sense of humour showing. What I really mean is that from what I can see on the website your work stands comparison with any of the work of the various ‘restoration groups’ (amateur or pro) that do this sort of thing. I know as I have worked with a few of them over the years. Well done!

    in reply to: rivets – chisel or drill? #1398678
    Mark V
    Participant

    In my own experience (reskinning C-130 flaps for Marshalls for 18 months) we usually found that chiselling dome head solid rivets would only work if the heads had already been weakened by drilling. As we were on piecework (bonus payment for job done quickly) the ‘old hands’ would just arm themselves with a heap of new drill bits, then drill into the rivet heads until reaching the point where the underside of the head would be. Then a quick flick of the wrist (so to speak) and the head would ping off onto the drill bit. One guy once tried air chiselling without predrilling but it took longer and made one one awful racket.

    I use a parallel pin punch to remove SP85 or SP80 rivet heads instead of the drill (or chisel) as the heads stack up on your drill bit like a kebab and are a pain to remove!

    in reply to: Spitfire Cockpit Section #1398683
    Mark V
    Participant

    there are guys out there who do this far better than i ever can.Dave

    Really? Who exactly? 🙂

    in reply to: Attention Mark V #1437401
    Mark V
    Participant

    Will do, GF! 🙂

    in reply to: Memphis Belle Filming 1989 #1437573
    Mark V
    Participant

    The TBM paint job bears a rather interesting similarity to the ‘nototrious’ new CAF Wildcat scheme that appeared recently!

    in reply to: Correct prop feathering? #1437581
    Mark V
    Participant

    An impossibly feathered prop maybe? Nice model all the same 😀

    Its all that ‘Mustang Fan’ blokes fault!

    in reply to: Duxford Magister #1437584
    Mark V
    Participant

    Intruiging display of a civil registration with the military markings. You do not see that very often JDK?

Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 2,768 total)