dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spraying Camouflage In WWII #1176491
    Mark V
    Participant

    While researching the Haynes Tiger Moth Manual (out next month, please buy, money needed to fix old aeroplanes!), I came across these two pictures in the deHMC archive of the painting operation at Cowley in 1940.

    Two very nice photos – but they were taken after May 1942 as that style of roundel and fin-flash was not introduced until then.

    in reply to: Spraying Camouflage In WWII #1177147
    Mark V
    Participant

    He did remember that Spitfires were not painted all in one go, it took too long.

    There is certainly evidence of that in Castle Bromwich photos. Lots of pictures of Spitfires painted but with newly fitted, un-painted, cowling panels.

    in reply to: Engine / Prop Internals .. ID required ? #1177546
    Mark V
    Participant

    Twin row radial with a three blade VP prop……. could be almost anything german, or american….. With the externals of the engine rotted away, hinting at extensive use of magnesium, I’d say some kind of german unit – BMW / FW190? (just a guess)

    The remains of wooden blades would suggest its not American. Three blade, wood, probably early Spitfire or Hurricane unless anything else was using wooden blades?

    in reply to: Spraying Camouflage In WWII #1177553
    Mark V
    Participant

    Supermarines drawings specified Stencil mats were to be produced,

    Thanks Tony – have used that drawing many times but never picked up on that note! Next time I am going to try to re-create this method – just need a Spitfire 😉

    Would still love to see some pictures of the mats ‘in action’ in the UK.

    in reply to: Still no flying Mossie or P-38 at Duxford ? #1177815
    Mark V
    Participant

    Anybody know if or when we last had a American engined Fury/Sea fury display in the UK?.

    Last weekend was the first time.

    in reply to: Still no flying Mossie or P-38 at Duxford ? #1177997
    Mark V
    Participant

    Ooops beaten to the reply, still, superb photo Mr angry.:D

    Yes I should have said – its an excellent photo! 🙂

    in reply to: Still no flying Mossie or P-38 at Duxford ? #1178138
    Mark V
    Participant

    This one, the other was P&W powered

    I thought the other one had the Wright R3350.

    in reply to: Still no flying Mossie or P-38 at Duxford ? #1178148
    Mark V
    Participant

    Was nice to see a pair of Centurous powered Furies cavorting about the sky again….:)

    Only one of the pair was Centaurus powered.

    in reply to: Still no flying Mossie or P-38 at Duxford ? #1178311
    Mark V
    Participant

    My mistake then , just to me that reads like a majority of the airframe will be newly built.

    The majority of the airframe will indeed be newly manufactured – but the airframe is only part of the overall aircraft, yes a big part but IMHO there is a significant enough amount of metal hardware in the Mosquito to allow restoration of those parts or use of original parts from another aircraft to still be able to say its a restored aircraft rather than simply a ‘new build’. The difference is subtle but important. Take a look at the Avspecs website progress photos and you will get an idea of the volume of metal and other non-wood parts.

    in reply to: Still no flying Mossie or P-38 at Duxford ? #1178323
    Mark V
    Participant

    With the 2 New builds in NZ (ok they incorporate historical parts) do you think we are becoming more accepting of them,

    I think that is an over-simplification – to simply suggest they are new-builds and compare with the FW190 replicas. KA114 is very much a restoration, it is based on an existing airframe and there are hundreds of original parts, many from ‘114 being used iin the restoration. Yes the wooden parts have been re-manufactured from the original drawings but this does not push the project in to the ‘new build’ catergory in my opinion.

    in reply to: "Elf and Safety Gone Mad" #1179123
    Mark V
    Participant

    I wonder whether the Historic aircraft flyers should play them at their own game and call their aircraft ‘Home Builds’ because if its that stringent how on
    earth do the home build aircraft get into the air?

    Graham

    There is a weight limitation associated with this classification which is lower than just about every aircraft we term ‘warbird’.

    in reply to: "Elf and Safety Gone Mad" #1179453
    Mark V
    Participant

    Can only be a matter of time before other operators are effected by this.

    If you ground one type be it P-40, spitfire etc, does it not put other operators of the same type in the same position with the CAA?

    Or is it not a level playing field here?

    Nobody has suggested or mentioned anything to do with ‘grounding a type’.

    in reply to: "Elf and Safety Gone Mad" #1179627
    Mark V
    Participant

    What is the situation with the ex-TFC P-40 at North Weald?

    Flying as normal.

    in reply to: Spotted #1180612
    Mark V
    Participant

    Can anybody confirm a reported sighting of four P-51’s over Dublin, just before mid-day, this past Sunday 12th July?

    Mark

    Unlikely to be P-51’s I think Mark, the three UK based examples that were not at Legends were in Yorkshire and Swansea/Essex. The other trio of European based aircraft were in their hangar in Germany. Cannot account for ‘Dam Yankee’ though.

    in reply to: John Woo directing Flying Tigers film?? #1184656
    Mark V
    Participant

    It will be interesting to see how the combination of live aircraft and CGI in Red Tails turns out – probably not being released until early 2010 though.

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 2,768 total)