dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire identification n°2 #1268804
    Mark V
    Participant

    Hi Spade grip how do you know thats a buchon prop? Is it because the tips have flat ends?

    Thats a well known fact, I believe there is a picture in one of Robert Rudhall’s books that shows the unpainted Buchon prop on TE308 (in fact I sent a copy of the book to the current owner of TE308 as I thought he would find that picture amusing).

    in reply to: No BBMF Spitfire or Hurricane flying any more, they said… #1271012
    Mark V
    Participant

    How times have changed since then. Of course considering a twenty year old aeroplane as worn out and ready to be scrapped was somewhat different in those days as there was a thriving aircraft manufacturing industry able to produce something to replace it.

    in reply to: What constitues a "preserved" historic aircraft? #1271020
    Mark V
    Participant

    I accept we have lost some aircraft to fire over the last few years but on the whole the losses are less than from within the airworthy catagory.

    The museum/hangar fire incidents are fewer but the ‘total loss’ count is probably significantly higher than the number totally lost in flying incidents.

    I am also not suggesting we should ground all the flyers or pull things out of meseums and try to fly them. The balance is probably about right as it is.

    Agreed (although a good number have been liberated from museums).

    in reply to: What constitues a "preserved" historic aircraft? #1271044
    Mark V
    Participant

    For an aircraft to be considered ‘preserved’ it it must be in a storage condition that protects it from any damaging influences, ie humidity,sun light,fire,vermin,insects and vandalism. So that in 50 or 100 years time it will be substantially the same as it is now.
    Any aircraft that is flown is not in this catagory as for one it is at risk of accidental destruction due to crash/fire.

    I think that is a somehat ‘hard-line’ view. In stating that you imply that a static stored aircraft is somehow protected from destruction by virtue of it not being flown. So how do you protect a ‘preserved’ aircraft from fire? Beyond reasonable precautions you cannot (and there is a very long list of museum ‘preserved’ airframes destroyed in fires in recent decades).

    in reply to: ID this Spit? (2004 Zombie!) #1272502
    Mark V
    Participant

    Anyone have any knowledge on both the reason for the sheild with the letter code in it?
    Or the colour?

    Firstly Alan welcome to the forum and thank you for posting these wonderful photos. It was fairly common practice to repeat the aircraft code letter under the nose often on a black (Night) circle to aid in identifying the individual aircraft from the front. As your Dad clearly enjoyed adding a bit of interesting artwork and personalisation (which looks great) to his aircraft it seems to me that this was another example of that.

    You can plainly see where the yellow roundel has been oversprayed here.

    Was there a reason for over-spraying here? – it was not uncommon for the Yellow paint to fail in this area giving the impression that it had been over-sprayed. Any paint spraying was likely to be confined to the rear fuselage to obliterate the 18″ tail -band as has clearly happened. The fuselage roundels were retained as they were with the wing roundels being modified to C1 type.

    Mark V
    Participant

    Hey Mark V,not sure what you mean by that remark !

    Err ‘port’ – ‘harbour’, get it? 🙂

    in reply to: Blenheim and Rolls Royce Spitfire RM689 Restoration progress #1272713
    Mark V
    Participant

    p.s. Ollie, its HARBAR not Harbour

    Well – any port in a storm :p

    in reply to: Supermarine Spitfire T9 drawings #1275761
    Mark V
    Participant

    No – this one:

    in reply to: Supermarine Spitfire T9 drawings #1275906
    Mark V
    Participant

    Try to find the book ‘Dutch Spitfires – A Techical Study’ by Harry van der Meer. It is full of scale drawings including the T.9.

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1278910
    Mark V
    Participant

    I’ll need to get down to Booker at some point next year to see ‘213.

    Steady Daz – thats south of the border you know!

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1280358
    Mark V
    Participant

    with MKV’s and Dennis the painter’s assistance she should be ready around christmas all being well.

    Ordering the wrapping paper and a very big bow now 🙂

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1280636
    Mark V
    Participant

    Can anyone tell me what anti corrosive finish (gunge) has been applied over the natural metal in this unpainted state ?

    Cheers

    John

    If you mean the yellowish areas on the fuselage, its etch primer – not ‘gunge’ – its applied with a spray gun rather than a trowel.

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1281111
    Mark V
    Participant

    Who’s been contracted to research and do the paint job, Mark?

    Personal Plane Services in conjunction with Warbird Colour Services. Of course several individuals contribute valuable research assistance with such a job, including Mark12 of course!

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1281169
    Mark V
    Participant

    Perhaps I missed it but how are they painting it up?

    I think we will have to wait for an ‘official’ announcement for that.

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1281215
    Mark V
    Participant

    Don’t forget VP441.I think Nelson ought to be persuaded to bring her over for a season.

    I don’t think he forgot about her. VP441 was restored by Nelson Ezell but has been based at her owners private strip since the re-build was completed (and he does not do airshows) so its not Nelson that would need persuading.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 2,768 total)