Just to clarify a point,what do we class as a ‘seaplane’?My understanding of the definition is that it applies to a floatplane which can be used on rough water,ie the sea and that aircraft with a hull-like fuselage like the CL-215 or the Be-200 are flying boats.
:confused:
“The undersurface was black and sky-grey or black and a sky-blue.
White wasn’t officially used.”
Not sure that’s true Moggy,my research over the years for various model kits suggests that the underside of the port wing was painted black and the starboard white.Sometimes they would even go as far as to paint the undersides of the fuselage,tail etc aswell.
These markings were for recognition purposes in the same way as the later black and white D-Day stripes.The half-and-half scheme was phased out at the end of 1941 with the introduction of the black and white stripes.
Below is a pic of the AFC’s Hurricane P3351 in her Battle of France colours.Pic taken by Ian Brodie and ‘lifted’ from the Alpine fighter collection’s site…
I think you’ve got the wrong Spit there Warhawk,the one you mention is a PR.XI (11),an unarmed Photo Recce model.The aircraft in question here is a Mk.V (5) fighter.
Both of them have a big mouth at the front and rear?? 😀
I’m guessing that will mean the end of all the flying on the site aswell?? 🙁
Sorry,here’s the pic…
Does anyone know what plans there are for her cockpit at Newark?Pic below shows it in a very sorry state.Pic taken from sweptwings.com
Looks like an Ilyushin Il-14.Odd way of displaying it with the tail in the roof like that.:confused:
Thanks for the explanation Steve,glad there’s method in the madness afterall.I’m guessing the move into the car park will prevent her from taxiing even if she is still ground run?
I’m no expert,but I think part of the reason is the helicopter.If you think of something like a SeaKing,it can do all of the roles you just mentioned and it doesn’t even need to land.Even if it did need to land on the water it is cleared do so,although you have to keep the rotor going to maintain stability.This is why the underside of a SeaKing looks like a boat.
I remember a case a few years ago where a Sikorsky S-76 suffered an engine failure whilst flying out to an oil rig in the North Sea.The crew carried out a perfect water landing on the open sea and despite the rough sea conditions the machine remained upright and afloat for many hours after the passengers and crew were rescued.A floatplane probably wouldn’t have performed so admirably.
It looks like a Meteor I or III.My guess would be the 1:72 kit from Airfix,or perhaps a Corgi model?
I was going to say the same thing as Doughnut.What’s the sense in moving her to a location where she can’t be ground run??
“No, no, no!! Heathen fools! The BUCHON is by far the best-looking, and most pugnacious of the Me109 family!”
Best looking?? :confused: I think you might need to borrow my specs Daz! :p Best looking of all the 109’s were the wooden tailed G’s and K’s,rather like ‘Black 2’.
As for the Flug Werke 190’s,the last I heard they were sorting out a problem with the propeller and they were still needing clearance to fly from the authorities.As far as I know they haven’t got as far as high-speed taxiing tests yet.
Looks like she’s coming along beautifully Eddie,many thanks for sharing the pictures.Looks like another NAW masterpiece in the making. 😎
I for one hope you get bored more often. 😀