dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Next years Warbird operators #2090160
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Hi Warbird,
    What is the reason for the sudden huge rise in insurance?Is it purely the Vintage aviation movement which is being subjected to it or is it across the board?I can understand insurance going up a bit considering the accidents there have been in the last couple of years,but this is just daft!I can’t really see how 9/11 should have too much impact on Warbirds,so what the hell is going on?

    in reply to: Meteor question #2090163
    Ant.H
    Participant

    How much life does the Llandbedr Meteor have in her?I read something in Aircraft Illustrated a few months back which stated that her retirement was imminent.
    Do they still have an active Canberra there aswell?

    in reply to: Christmas competition #2090605
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Maybe the wreck of the C-82 Packet used in Flight of the Pheonix?

    in reply to: Canopus To Fly? #2090621
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I share Steve and Doughnut’s opinion in theory,but part of my question was to ask whether getting Canopus flying would be any less of a saga than the Vulcan project has been so far.If the project looks like being more straightforward,then I would support a restoration to fly.Certainly something needs to be done with her,if she’s kept outdoors she won’t last too long even if they do continue to taxi her.

    in reply to: Shorts Belfast #2090625
    Ant.H
    Participant
    in reply to: Emsworth Crash? #2091166
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Wow-interesting link about the Typhoon in Pagham Harbour.We used to go to Pagham for seaside day trips when I was a child and we still go there quite often in the summer months.I first became aware of the Typhoon incident when I saw the engine and intact (!) upper canopy section on display at Tangmere a few years ago.Pagham Harbour is now an RSPB nature reserve,and it’s a very tranquil place on a summer evening.I’ve often stood there watching the sun go down and thinking about that Typhoon and it’s pilot-it’s good to now know a greater amount of the story,and also a surprise to learn that there was an ALG at Church Norton and that there’s now a visitor centre-I’ll go and have a hunt for them next time I’m in that neck of the woods.
    The Harbour has been disused since the 19th Century and it was used as an aerial firing range during the war years-you can still see the wrought iron targets with enormous holes punched into them by 3-inch rockets.

    in reply to: V-S Seafire FR Mk 47, VP441. #2091401
    Ant.H
    Participant

    “And yes, it is a pity it wasn’t kept in the UK, but there was no interest being shown at the time.”

    Somebody on another thread was saying that the RN/FAA destroyed an awful lot of records of aircraft they had operated in the late 40’s and 50’s.Presuming that ‘441’s paperwork from this peariod has been lost this way,would the CAA have allowed her to fly even if interest had been shown,and indeed perhaps that’s why interest wasn’t shown at the time?

    in reply to: Yeah, alright – but what was number two? #2091635
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I agree with Steve when he says that we can’t know for sure what was achieved by the pioneers and so therefore aren’t best placed to judge,but having read the article about Pearse in Aeroplane I feel it’s important to get things right in his case.
    The important thing about Pearse is that HE HIMSELF denied that he had made any successful flights.During the latter years of his life he wrote to many people and even to national and international newspapers stating that he had NOT successfully flown.The claims of his ‘success’ have been made by seemingly fanatical Pearse enthusiasts since his death,and not by the man himself.
    The Pearse thing has really got out of control in recent years-there are even school books in NZ now which state Pearse as the first to achieve powered flight.This kinda thing has to be stamped out before it gains any more credibility.Quite why the Pearse myth has taken off nobody seems to know,although it’s perhaps down to him being half caste (Scottish-born father,Maori mother) and so therefore a ‘perfect’ New Zealander.

    in reply to: concord bullet #2091671
    Ant.H
    Participant

    “Do you know anything about the Javelin incidents mentioned above?
    I’ve recently seen one with your name under it

    Cheers, Transall.”

    I did an extensive amount of research when I built my Javelin model but I didn’t see anything about Javelins running into thier own bullets,although in theory I suppose it could’ve happenned.I would guess that it is unlikely to have happenned as the Jav was,I beleive,transonic rather than supersonic,ie it would only go supersonic if you were really pushing it(a pre-production machine did a supersonic dive over the outskirts of London to prove that the aircraft could be made to go supersonic without control being lost,as had been suggested by a former Gloster test pilot in the national press,a suggestion which had damaged Gloster’s and the Javelin’s reputation.A loud Javelin-generated sonic boom over London soon restored thier image! :D)
    For anyone who doesn’t know what Transall is talking about,here’s the link to a review I wrote of Airfix’s FAW.9 Javelin.

    http://m2reviews.cnsi.net/reviews/korean/harringtonjav.htm

    in reply to: V-S Seafire FR Mk 47, VP441. #2091675
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Thanks for all that info Laurie,interesting stuff.Great news about the paintjob too,I’d like to join with those above in thanking the owner for his decision to stick with an authentic colour scheme. 🙂

    in reply to: concord bullet #2092071
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Cheers Transall,it was the F11F icident I was thinking of.:) Did the guy make it down ok or did he actually get shot down by his own sheels??

    in reply to: concord bullet #2092116
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Just to add my penny’s worth to this (slightly strange) discussion, I don’t think Concorde would ever meet the bullets she fired for the simple reason that bullets drop as they slow down. Perhaps Concorde could catch up with them,but in the vertical plane the bullets would be at a lower altitude.
    There was a case where a USAF (Starfighter?) was hit by his own cannon shells,but he was in a dive rather than straight and level.

    in reply to: Dh2 #2092864
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Looks like the site’s up and working again! 🙂 I can’t tell whether it’s a scale replica or full size,but whatever it is it’s a lovely piece of work.Estimating it’s size by the size of the pilot,I’d say it was a scale replica,perhaps 4/5ths or 5/6ths.
    Thanks for all your efforts Macky,it was worthwhile in the end. 🙂

    in reply to: Dh2 #2093396
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Sorry to be a pain Macky,but the piccies aren’t coming through on Pprune-any chance you could post one or two up on here?

    in reply to: Dh2 #2093403
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Sounds interesting Macky-any chance you could post the link?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 2,663 total)