I’m sorry to hear this news, sincere condolences to all his family and friends. A battle well fought by the sound of things, in the spirit of those he wrote about.
Sad to see it go, although with the recent passing of Alex Vraciu I wonder if it might arrive in time for a funeral flypast? I’m guessing the timing is too tight.
The Tri-State Warbird Museum in Ohio also have a Flug Werk kit, but have presumably been fully occupied fixing their P-40M after its forced landing
I found the following pic on airliners.net and thought I’d link it here, it seems progress is being made. Registration is N190AF to add to John Terrell’s list.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Flug-Werk-FW/2571982/L/&sid=1531cc5bb297f4bb47a8002acce0703a
I could be completely wrong, and I can’t quote any sources off the top of my head, but I’ve always understood that 100 octane was US supplied and that there was a clause in the pre-war contract that stipulated the suspension of supplies should Britain go to war. The supply duly stopped in September ’39 and a new wartime contract had to be negotiated, 100 octane becoming available again during the latter stages of the Battle of France.
I think it was mentioned on WIX that the silver example has had a belly landing/gear collapse more recently and is again under repair. I think the green one in Nowotny colours is stored at Manching?
*Edited: the silver 190 has had only one belly landing/gear collapse
Canadair CL-215/ Bombardier CL415?
Can’t add much here either, but would be rude not to chip in. Thanks to all at Key who back the forum and everyone else involved, as has been said it must be a tough job at times.
Merry Christmas all!
Congratulations to everyone at JAM, great to see another Javelin going to a museum!
Out of interest, will there be room indoors for it alongside the FAW.9 or will it have to be kept outdoors for now?
Absolutely awful, sincere condolences to his family and friends.
I can understand a museum’s wish to officialise the association between an outside team and the museum (loaning stuff out on the basis of trust and verbal agreement has meant the loss of artefacts from various collections over the years), but to not even consider meeting with you to discuss things is just crass. Is there anyone we can write to or is there a petition that could be signed? I honestly think it’s a project that needs to be put back on the rails ASAP, so much good work has already been done.
Rang a bell, found this pic that I scanned earlier this year. Can’t oblige with a Lanc in shot (thinks; did that ever happen ?). You’ll have to make do with a B17. Biggin, I think. Apologies for the poor quality.
That pic would be at Biggin in ’94 or perhaps ’95, the Mosquito has the 50th anniversary D-Day stripes. The Biggin shows used to put on some amazing bomber formations in the early 90’s, ’92 had B17, B24 (Dimaond Lil, visiting from USA), B25 and Mosquito, and then for the next two or three years the Blenheim flew in place of the B24. As I remember it, the Lanc never flew in the formation but it was usually the next slot after the civvy-owned bombers.
Congratulations to all the Blenheim crew, I don’t mean to take their thread off on too much of a tangent!
Obviously the Oshkosh accident was awful, with very serious consequences for the pilot, but I wonder was the aircraft destroyed? I remember seeing pictures on the web of the wreck taken a few months after the accident and it appeared to have broken up into remarkably recognisable sections, and I seem to remember that a long-term rebuild to flight was being talked about.
I’m relying on my grey matter, so there’s every chance I’ve mixed up two different wrecks. Can anyone confirm?
I’ve heard that four-bladers also do nasty things to the handling due to the prop vortex affecting the tail, hence why they tend to stick to three blades if possible. I think it was G-ORGI that had problems when it was first flown after restoration with a four blade prop, most of the trouble being cured by a three blader.
I don’t like to be a nay-sayer, but with regard to the RAFM Dornier the most important point is perhaps that it spent much of the time in the seabed rather than on it. The parts that crumbled away on recovery (tail and outer wings) were those that had been most exposed in the open water. A wreck that has been sitting in a tropical sea for the same period would surely be worse off for corrosion and consumption by sea life?
Congratulations to all involved, this is great news. It’s always nice to see a historic aircraft get a proper roof over it’s head, especially when there’s the prospect of it being airworthy again when it’s rolled back out.