I’d suggest getting some pictures taken and posting them up on here for identification, or ask your friend to list the part numbers of the various bits.
Sorry to hear about this, on the plus side nobody hurt and the damage doesn’t look too serious.
Formerly owned by TFC. (Sorry to correct you, it’s the forum, it turns most folks into idiots).
That’s completely untrue, I can categorically state that I was an idiot before I joined.
I would normally say thanks for the info, but instead I’ll say thanks for the confusion. 😀 I did wonder if it might be one of the Indian-built British kits, and whether the possibility of it being British made would make life easier regards UK paperwork.
Surprised no one else has commented on the single seat Gnat that will be returning to the air which I believe would make it unique as a flier, certainly in the UK anyway. Can’t wait to see that one finished and airborne!
Rob
Very much seconded, it’s certainly something to look forward to. Is this example one of the exported, British-built examples or is she Indian built?
If true that’s a great shame, Hahnweide has been on my bucket list for a while. It just goes to show we should do things sooner rather than later…
I sincerely hope there’s some sort of resolution to the problems for the sake of everyone involved.
As far as I’m aware, records are no longer kept at Innsworth. The RAF disclosures department is now at RAF Cranwell, here’s a link to the RAF website where you can submit an access request online.
http://www.raf.mod.uk/community/support/requestforinformationfromservicerecords.cfm
Wow, the Vulcan looks great! Thanks for keeping us up to date.
The good news is that nobody’s numbers came up, so it’s a rollover again. 😀
Hi Simon,
The 8th Air force in the UK was split up into three Bomb Wings, later called Air Divisions, and what you see is the triangle symbol that denotes the 1st Air Division. The 2nd Air Division were marked with a disc, and the 3rd Air Division by a square. Unfortunately the screenshot you’ve put up isn’t high enough res to show the letter written in the triangle, this would indicate which Group it was from.
These shapes were also repeated on the fins, although in the case of the 2nd Air Division (all Liberator), they often substituted the fin markings with a more colourful system.
Here’s the link to the Wiki page which gives a good run-down of how the system worked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAAF_unit_identification_aircraft_markings
Great shots David, thanks for putting them up.
I’ve often wondered why there isn’t some kind of historic water-bomber flight on the US airshow scene. I can understand that something like a Tigercat or B17 is more desirable in military config, but it would surely be a popular act and a good way to preserve a Neptune, Privateer etc in airworthy trim.
Hi Taifun,
I don’t have anything against a Pingouin being dressed up as a 108, but I was wondering if you might consider an Axis scheme other than Luftwaffe? There are various rather tasty Hungarian schemes to choose from, or perhaps even RAF colours as an Aldon??
Just a thought, it’s not as if I’m paying the bills…
I missed out an I, it should read VI (6). The Lanc VI had the enlarged nacelles etc, and could be confused with a Lincoln.
Definately a Licoln rather than a Lanc VI, remote operated nose turret and the bomb-aimer’s glazing are the giveaway.
Edit: Mk. number corrected
It looks very much like a French Air Force pilot’s brevet, although not quite identical in detail. How big is it? Perhaps it’s a veterans tie-pin or brooch?
Just a best guess…
Yes, a contra-prop was certainly tested on a Hawker Tornado.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]232020[/ATTACH]