dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tu-4 and Tu-4(AEW) #232337
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Wow,wonderful models. I didn’t believe thy were R/C till I saw the pic with the two guys in it 😀 Is the Tu4 a flyer too??
    Thanks Zoot. 🙂

    in reply to: RAAF History – A bit of a potted photo history #1418465
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Ah,more treasure 🙂 Thanks again John,that head-on Hudson shot is wonderfully evocative.

    in reply to: RAAF History – A bit of a potted photo history #1418618
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Thanks Dave,can’t believe I didn’t twig it myself :rolleyes: The thick plottens as they say,just about everything is wrong for a Gamecock so far as I can tell. The wing struts,rigging,undercart and engine are all completely different to all the Gamecock references I can find. I was recently sent a complete set of cutaway plans and rigging diagrams etc for the Gamecock by a friend who’s doing some in-depth research into the type,and nothing fits when I compare all this info to the photo.
    The alternatives that spring to mind are the Gloster Mars,Nieuport Nightjar and Nieuport Nighthawk. The Mars/Nightjar seems to fit the bill the best in structural terms,complete with the wide-track,long stroke undercarriage legs. The problem is that I can’t find reference to any Mars’ or Nightjars being fitted with anything but a rotary engine.
    Anyone have any suggestions?

    in reply to: RAAF History – A bit of a potted photo history #1419117
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Wonderful shots John,thanks for digging them out. Do you have any details to go with the photo’s?Any ideas what type the biplane on the right in the very top row is,or who the pilot might be?What about the biplane ‘fighter’ with the wide track undercart in the second row of the second batch?It looks rather like a Gloster Mars or one of its derivatives.
    Interesting. 🙂

    in reply to: Kyushu J7W1 shinden video !!! #1424344
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Thanks for the corrections folks,I’ve really gotta stop relying on my memory and actually look things up!

    in reply to: Kyushu J7W1 shinden video !!! #1424908
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Wonderful footage of an amzing machine,as others have said it seems remarkable that the film has survived.
    The question of how a pilot might’ve bailed out is an interesting one. The Do335 was fitted with a primitive ejector seat propelled by compressed air,and it makes me wonder if the Japanese devised or copied a similar device for the Shinden. Does anyone have any details of Japanese ejector seats?
    TT-being a pedantic g*t,I have to point out that the Do335 never had detachable prop blades,but it did have a detachable tail fin. Because of the type’s cruciform tail configuration,the lower tailfin was seen as being inconvenient in the event of a belly landing. For this reason the lower tailfin was attached via explosive bolts,which blew this lower fin off prior to a belly landing. Perhaps this is what you were thinking of?

    in reply to: The Triple Cross 1967 #1425813
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Glad to be of service 🙂 Just to expand on what Melv was hinting at,the Argus 411 is in a bigger league compared to something like a Gypsy as suggested by Auster Fan. The 411 is an inverted,air cooled inline but it’s a V-12!

    in reply to: The Triple Cross 1967 #1426373
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Ok,had another brainwave! Perhaps it was a Seibel Si204? This was a German equivelant to the Anson and a number were built in Czechoslovakia and France post-war. The Czech version was the Aero C.3 and the French was the Nord NC.702. There’s a listing of survivors here…

    http://www.preservedaxisaircraft.com/Luftwaffe/siebel/siebel.htm

    and a decent pic here…

    http://www.preservedaxisaircraft.com/Luftwaffe/siebel/images/NC%20702%20cn%20350%20Aero%20C3A.jpg

    in reply to: The Triple Cross 1967 #1426519
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Hmmm,well it’s not quite Heinkel size and it definately doesn’t have Merlins,but in other ways it sounds like the prone-pilot Ried & Sigrist Desford. No?

    http://www.enygmag.freeserve.co.uk/hist1p%7E2.htm

    in reply to: Where is G-Fire now ? #1428328
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Yep,N611JR and G-HUNT are one in the same.

    in reply to: Reno (again!) #479085
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The replica MB.5 has been built using as many P51 parts as possible,hence the slightly distorted and stumpy appearance. It’s quite a piece of work,although admittedly it doesn’t quite do justice to the original.

    in reply to: Old Rhinebeck (11th September) #479695
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Since this thread was first posted,I found the Old Rhinebeck website via Google. It’s a great site with comprehensive listings of the collection’s airframes and artefacts,and includes details of each aircraft’s current status (airworthy,taxiiable,static etc)…

    http://www.oldrhinebeck.org/collection_airplane.htm

    I was under the impression that the collection was made up almost exclusively of replicas,but even just a quick browse shows how many original machines they have. Some absolute gems,one to add to my ‘must visit’ list if I ever get to N America.

    in reply to: Old Rhinebeck (11th September) #480208
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Lovely pics TMN,thanks for sharing. As Daz says,it looks like a fascinating place (Yep,I’ve seen the documentary too Daz 🙂 ) What’s the early monoplane in the third batch of pictures?

    in reply to: TAF Oscars – one that flew without crashing #1341189
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Early Oscars (the Ki43-I models) had the two blade props,but the improved Ki43-II had a more pwerful engine and a 3 blade prop.

    in reply to: TFC Airacobra #1342264
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Doh! 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 2,663 total)