I’ve just finsihed reading Geoff Wellum’s book “First Light”,in which he describes flying Spits at night from RAF Pembrey in south Wales in defence of Bristol.The glow from the exhausts were apparently very bright,those plates you see on nightfighter Hurri’s and things like that were absolutely essential for night flying,the glare would’ve blinded the pilot otherwise.
To stray slightly from the original question,the exhaust glare on RAF bombers was bright enough for German nightfighters to home in on as they came in for the kill.Experienced Luftwaffe crews could even recognise the type of bomber by the pattern of it’s exhaust flames-even with the exhaust shrouds,the glow could still be seen from a reasonable distance from directly behind.
Ok,just a guess here Mark12,but would it be the Kennet Seafire??
Location-Hounslow??
By happy coincidence,a piccy of XG900 in complete form has just been posted up on Airliners.net…
…to any Science Museum staff seeing this,count the wings-yes there are meant to be TWO of them!Note also it’s horizontal positioning… 😀
Nice pics DuxHawk,
I put up a few of her after my visit a few months ago and there were some some ‘interesting’ comments to say the least…!
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16710&highlight=Shorts+SC.1
“Of course the Soviets copied western designs… that is why the most powerful Turboprop engine in the world is Soviet, as is the most powerful turbine engine in a helo…”
Whilst these engines aren’t Western copies as such,they do have western origins.A number of German engine specialists and designers were shipped off to the Soviet Union after the war and were kept as virtual prisoners.They ate and slept where they worked,literally.Engines like the Kusnetsov NK-12 were designed and built by these German labourers.
Now that’s the kind of news I like to hear when I wake up on a sunday morning! 😀 Thanks Peter,great stuff!
*Another bump*
Only a few days left,over £10k of the £20k required has now been raised.C’mon folks…
I dunno if it has any technical bearing,but her registration has recently (Jan ’04) been transferred from G-BWUF to G-MIGG.I’m probably putting 2 and 2 together and making five,but it suggests to me that the owner(s) are optimistic about her flying.
More info available on the CAA’s G-INFO site.Search for ‘G-MIGG’…
Hi Rob,
Yes,there’s a pair-Air Atlantique have Pembroke XL954/G-BXES and there’s also the former Duxford-based example WV740/G-BNPH which recently changed hands and I think is now operated out of Shoreham (?).
Hi James,
I don’t really want to get involved int his battle,but I thought I better point out that David was talking about the HFL (Historic Flying Ltd) hanger and not an HLF (Heritage Lottery Fund) building!Historic Flying Ltd’s hangar was built just a couple of years ago and I think David was suggesting that if that modern hangar was possible,then another on the museum site would be feasable in terms of planning permission etc.
Hi Charlie,
There was a post about TE184 a few days ago which suggested that she has just recently changed hands,so she could be getting some love and attention in the near future.
Hi andrewman,
I got thier email addy from the letter that philo posted above…
[email]alacey@hulldailymail.co.uk[/email]
Ok,I’ve sent a letter to the Hull Daily Mail aswell.I know it’s hardl likely to make a difference,but it can’t hurt to try…
“Dear Editor,
I’m writing in response to the article you ran on the ‘saving’ of the Blackburn Beverley aircraft by the museum at Fort Paull.Whilst this news may at first appear to be good for the aircraft and it’s supporters,it is in fact a very disappointing outcome.
It should be realised that Fort Paull will make a very poor home for the aircraft due to the salty air and the lack of any protection from the elements, which combined with the lack of skilled maintenence staff will mean that the aircraft will corrode very quickly to a point where it becomes structurally unsafe,not to mention unsightly.In effect, moving the aircraft to Fort Paull will put it in an even worse position than it is in now.
If Fort Paull is such a bad location,then why take it there in the first place?The answer,sadly,is money and it has nothing to do with the preservation of the aircraft.If the aircraft lasts for,say,five years (that’s an optmimistic estimate by the way!),then the revenue from the number of extra visitors the aircraft attracts will have covered the costs of the aircraft’s movement and will also line the pockets of the museum.
I say again,the location of the aircraft to Fort Paull has nothing to do with the aircraft’s preservation,it will simply corrode and will have to be scrapped in just a very few years.
If this sounds rather drastic and melodramatic,I assure you it’s not.As a stark example of this,there was at one time an aviation museum at Southend in Essex.This entire collection lasted less than ten years and nearly all of the aircraft on site had to be scrapped when the museum closed due to the condition that they were in,including a Beverley.
There are many who share the view that the last remaining Beverley should NOT be going to Fort Paull and should instead be heading for somewhere like the Yorkshire Air Museum,where it can be restored and looked after by museum staff and where it will not be at the mercy of the salty,coastal environment.You may say that atleast if it does go to Fort Paull then that’s better than it being scrapped,but in fact as an aviation enthusiast,I think I would prefer to see the aircraft reduced to scrap tomorrow rather than having to watch it fall to bits at Fort Paull in the coming years.
Yours Sincerely,
Anthony Harrington
London,UK”
“Didn’t the P-35 lead to the P-47 eventually?”
Yup,it certainly did,via the Republic P43 Lancer…
She looks tasty even in just the primer;) Congratulations to all involved and a big thank you for putting another Spitfire in the sky for us all to enjoy. 🙂