dark light

BSG-75

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,226 through 3,240 (of 3,576 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should the MOD sell off our Historic military assets? #1208846
    BSG-75
    Participant

    HMS (her macDonalds Ship) Victory ?

    I don’t think so:mad:

    in reply to: Civilian Mirage III flies in Switzerland #1209299
    BSG-75
    Participant

    I think it would be like the “A-team”

    Shall we have a whip-round and buy the head of the Civil Aviation Authority a trip in it just to prove that it is possible to operate fast jets in private hands?

    I ain’t getting in no plane Hannibal I pity the fool who flies…

    we’d have to drug him and let him wake up, say, Mach 1.2 inverted…..:diablo:

    in reply to: Cockpits II #1209310
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Yes that sounds like the place;), as reguarding the removing of the unwanted bit behind the pressure bulkhead can you get to all the bolts ok?
    I think cockpitfest might come a little early but who knows;)
    all the best Matt

    didn’t fancy the Trident as well then:D

    never appreciated how thin the skin is until I was up close to it – quite a treasure trove there when I was looking, tractors, aircraft sections…

    in reply to: Cockpits II #1209740
    BSG-75
    Participant

    where in Hampshire ?

    Pure Lightning – can I ask, from just outside Basingstoke, large house, barns etc? I only ask as I helped my father in law deliver there last year, there was a Canberra cockpit section in an out building, with a Trident cockpit section as well.

    in reply to: Open Cockpit days at air Museums #1211980
    BSG-75
    Participant

    I’m very glad the smaller museums’ open cockpit days continue, almost against the H&S fearing norm.
    Years ago I was lucky enough to have a guided internal tour of Cosfords Lincoln, Liberator and Belfast, and sat in the ME410, these simple actions left a lasting impression on me, as undoubtedly they still do on people lucky enough to experience these things now.

    thats fantastic – throw in a fat bloke with a beard and its christmas come early! as above, I was lucky enough for the F-104, Vulcan and Argosy at Midlands, plus the Meteor they have inside and they opened up the Hind for my son as well – the ME-410 must have been superb – is it complete internally, instruments etc ?

    in reply to: International Air Power Review (IAPR) dead? #2476188
    BSG-75
    Participant

    any ideas how long ?

    much against my best instinct, I carried on – great publication, less than stella in terms of printing, publication, shipping, keeping to their intentions etc !

    in reply to: Vildebeest versus Swordfish #1212168
    BSG-75
    Participant

    [QUOTE=JDK;1296543]That would be the Royal Australian Air Force, thanks. I think she’s your Queen, too. 😉 Sorry to mention it, but it’s as irritating as the ‘British Air Force’.
    QUOTE]

    I stand corrected – apologies –

    with the doubling up comment, it explains a bit about the Barracuda !

    Going (again) back on thread, Swordfish, in daylight, over Norway with no fighter cover (or limited) would have suffered as much as the Skua’s did surely.

    I read a long time ago a book about a Vildebeast pilot based in Hong Kong who was captured having never flown against the Japanese in case it was provocative ! – 3.5 years in a camp writing a diary (in code) that his wife managed to read years later,

    in reply to: Vildebeest versus Swordfish #1212260
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Not sure either would be able to do a “Stuka/Helldiver” type dive and pull out structurally – again I’ve read of Swordfish glide bombing at a shallow angle, I think (and will happily stand corrected) at Taranto as well as the torpedo attack?

    in reply to: Vildebeest versus Swordfish #1212277
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Still, this is all rather later in the war than the discussion we were meant to be having. My point was really that history may have taken a different tack had there been Swordfish on that raid in June 1940. Interestingly, one of the theories about the court-martial of HMS Glorious’ Commander Air was that he refused to sanction a ‘near suicidal’ strike on German army positions during the Norwegian campaign which the Captain demanded. Clearly some people knew of the shortcomings of the Stringbag even in 1940.

    I agree – we’ve gone off thread a bit ! Then again, Dive Bombing in a Wildebeast……:eek:

    in reply to: Vildebeest versus Swordfish #1212307
    BSG-75
    Participant

    [QUOTE=XN923;1296503]The FAA didn’t turn down Helldivers – there was even one frontline squadron of them. QUOTE]

    Did they ever go to sea? I understood that they trained and stood up in the USA but never deployed? I read also about the politics behind the purchase, or not, same with the Australian Air Force I think ?

    Am at work, need to get home to the books and read up !

    in reply to: Another veteran departs #1212311
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Thanks for the kind messages, which I will pass on to Doug’s on.

    I was able to record an interview with him about his amazing flying career not long before he died. The ultimate aim is to make this available on CD, along with the 80-odd other veteran recordings completed so far. I think it is so important to be able to capture these chaps thoughts in sound while we still can.

    that is a fantastic tribute – I’ve read a few of the “forgotten voices” series along similar lines, good luck and congratulations on the project to keep the memories and voices alive.

    in reply to: Vildebeest versus Swordfish #1212357
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Or would Skuas have been kept in service a bit longer as the FAA’s sole strike tool? Would the FAA have thrown its focus onto dive bombing like the USN did after its torpedo bombers were massacred at Midway?

    anybody know if Peter C Smith reads the forum? He loves that old debate about dive bombing etc – something the RN never seem to have decided, the Skua was a mixed requirement (fighter/diver bomber) – The FAA turned down Helldivers and the Dauntless, but used Avengers as bombers (shallow dive) more than Torpedo bombers.

    One of those age old debates (TSR-2, Douglas Bader etc etc) that keep us all talking !

    in reply to: Wellington Bomber #1212837
    BSG-75
    Participant

    I’m sure there are British actors who could be miscast as well…

    Daniel Radciff as Gibson
    Roicky Gervais as Barnes Wallace
    Hugh Grant as the Prime Minister…putting a brilliant Tony Blair “spin” on Churchill
    Alan Cummings as Gibson’s batman

    Recast a corgi as the lab…

    Problem with that, is that Ricky Gervais can only ever play Ricky Gervais, and Hugh Grant can only ever play Hugh Grant ! But, having seen a few James McEvoy movies, I can see that working….. we will see…..

    BSG-75
    Participant

    Flt Lt Lee in many ways symbolises fighter command in 1940 to me, I have the same book and with him vanishing chasing Bf-109’s, its incredibly sad.

    I’m sure I’ve read elsewhere that the footage was included in the film, also that he flew inverted and had grass stuck to the aerial !?

    In my study I have a framed picture of a group of 85 Squadron pilots, taken late one evening, all holding pints, Lee is there, most were killed within weeks of it being taken.

    in reply to: Wellington Bomber #1213334
    BSG-75
    Participant

    I will keep my faith in the attention to detail and fresh approach that is normally shown in their work by those that work for Wingnut Films and Weta Workshops, amd in the scriptwriter Stephen Fry and others involved like Frost and Jackson and Rivers, all intelligent and respectd men, and reserve judgment till I’ve seen the film.

    I agree – am poised to post in a rage when Tom Cruise is cast as Guy Gibson:diablo: Harrison Ford as Barnes Wallis:diablo:….Mat Damon as “dingy young”

    am looking forward to some images of the models etc as well as casting,

Viewing 15 posts - 3,226 through 3,240 (of 3,576 total)