More pics of 51 this time added here (scroll down) …i guess now it’s possible to scrutinize every inch of 51 and 52 for differences.:)
http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=47701&page=31
Btw it seems 51 has those stabilator strakes aswell.
Loads of new pictures of T-50-2 at Paralay.com.
http://paralay.iboards.ru/viewtopic.php?style=12&f=5&t=1549&start=600
Can i ask does any of you gents know what are the strakes on T-50-2’s stabilators, are they strain gauges or are they some sort of reinforcements for the stabilators? Thanks.
Btw thanks for the drawings Paralay . To be honest, me i find it hard to believe that if they can fit two RVV-BD in each bay, they can’t fit 3 of the smaller RVV-SD. We’ll see i guess. ๐
On a more technical note , regarding the RVV-BD …specs on ktrv website show a weight of 510 kg, range ~200km, max g being 8 ( which i would say it’s pretty impressive for such a big missile).
Now from what i can find on the web ( quite scarce btw) the R-37 is heavier ( 600kg) and longer ranged ( max range ~300km?) , so can it be assumed that RVV-BD was “squeezed” to fit the PAK-FA bays ?
More PAK-FA (and others too).
http://pompeya.livejournal.com/655789.html#cutid1
NVM, someone replied before me, and much more knowledgeable too. ๐
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Future of Russian Air force right here:
http://russianplanes.net/images/to52000/051382.jpghttp://russianplanes.net/images/to52000/051381.jpg
Great angle of 02http://russianplanes.net/ID51380
Sisters
:eek::eek::eek: .
Boy it’s been a continuous PAK-FA orgasm these days. Hope all goes well for them and everything else at MAKS.
One question- is the radome shape defined by the boundary of the white line or is it that just the way that the radome has been painted ? The radiation symbol is drawn behind the white radome, so does that indicate that the radome is in front of that?
If so, any reason why its shape is different from regular radomes?
It’s just the way it’s painted, we don’t know the shape of the dielectric radome yet, if it’s going to be canted or jagged etc. ( probably it will appear on T-50-3). The two prototypes only have a metal radome.
Just check here for the latest T-50 pics. (too many to post in one go !)
http://paralay.iboards.ru/viewtopic.php?style=12&f=5&t=1549&start=570
Look at this one …:eek:
http://russianplanes.net/ID51365
Also, unconfirmed rumour is that T-50-3 should be rolled out at the end of August. (according to ะะตััะฝ/QuadroFX)
Bort 52 ๐
Photo (c) MAFIA at Aviaforum
Oh, look here …:eek: Rehearsals for MAKS. Beautiful innit ?
http://fotografersha.livejournal.com/144749.html
Thanks alot QuadroFX, goodies started to come out already .:eek:
Quick question. That RVV-SD( behind the big boy ), are they all suposed to have folding “potato mashers” or is that a specific version for T-50 (well most likely i guess) ?
Second , don’t supose it’s clear yet how many RVV-BD and RVV-SD the T-50 can carry internally, is it?
Oh and it seems both T-50s have airshow numbers ( 051 and 052).:rolleyes:
:confused: You are correct there’s something under the belly and additionally IMO someone “doctored” a bit on that photo since it shows nearyl two different halfs ! :confused:
Deino
IMO that’s a shopped ( and poorly ) pic of an older image. I’m looking at the original right now, landing gear down, exactly same canard and ailerons angle, exactly same overall angle.
PS: Lookie here.:)
Now THESE are some well done pics, nice and clear, reasonable resolution … ๐
Copyright (C) GT at CDF
Umm…you mean appealing, right ?;)