dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2369935
    mack8
    Participant

    Ah, finally! Good job Sukhoi and LII chaps. So it’s bort 52, not 53 as rumoured few months ago . Also interesting that 052 number on the fins , would that be specifically for MAKS?

    Hopefully we’ll see inflight pics of 52 too.:)

    bingo…today’s training was something extraordinary

    Was it ?:eek: Can you tell us more please? Thanks.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2370043
    mack8
    Participant

    Hmmm…Su-35S falling behind schedule ? Did Zelin really said those things ? (about Su-35’s systems vs it’s amerikanski counterparts ) :confused:

    http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20110809/414113693.html

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2371293
    mack8
    Participant

    Atm T-50-2 has only 4 or 5 flights made , and hasn’t flown from LII yet since moved, so the rest of them ( close to seventy-it flew i think few times more after that 14th june news and before being taken into workshop for modification ) were made by T-50-1.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2371338
    mack8
    Participant

    So let me get this straight..
    The T-50-01 has what, some 40-50 test flights so far and is allready entering Spin recovering proceedures..

    I think it’s closer to 70.:)
    Some news quoting that figure ( as of mid june, btw), i know there’s a specific bit of news quoting that figure for about mid june on Sukhoi.org, i’ll look for it and post the link, if need be.

    http://www.ruaviation.com/news/2011/6/14/368/

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2371570
    mack8
    Participant

    That’s one neat spin-chute installation there.:) I was kinda expecting something like that F-22 type frame thing , and was wondering if ( hopefully ) it will perform at MAKS with that thing hanging on it’s back . But i got my answer now .:)

    in reply to: Hot Dog's Ketchup Filled F-35 News Thread #2371862
    mack8
    Participant

    Ooops…aparently all F-35s grounded again …IPP failure on AF-4.
    http://www.f35.com/news-events/

    Wasn’t AF-4 the same one involved in the earlier auxiliary power pack failure?
    PS: Earlier failure news ( march 9th)

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/03/11/354281/in-flight-failure-leads-to-f-35-grounding.html

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2372275
    mack8
    Participant

    Two PAK-FA to be presented in flight at MAKS 2011? 😮
    http://vz.ru/news/2011/8/1/511672.html

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372346
    mack8
    Participant

    Didn’t know that Chinese Su-27UBKs were wired for R-77. That means there must have been some radar updates, right?

    Ummm…aren’t those Su-30MKKs?
    PS: I stand corrected , i see the RWR antenna on the intake side now.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372395
    mack8
    Participant

    Well Deino believes it’s most likely 1034 in this picture earlier this year …
    http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/air-force/new-j-10-thread-iii-117-4290.html#post146838

    Now , if our chinese friends would agree to release that picture without the bort number on the tail being censored, well, we’d know for sure if that’s 1034 or not. 😉

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2372423
    mack8
    Participant

    If what i’m reading on the chinese orintated forums is correct , then J-20 2002 should be a static airframe, while the next flying airframe should be 2003, at end of 2011 or begining 2012? ( think it was mentioned 2003 might even have the radar , the chinese EODAS type system and even new engines- i hope i’m not mixing things up )

    Thanks.:)

    J20 with J10B, actually the J20 is not that big

    Of course not, it’s not the 80,000lb F-111 class behemont bomber (OMG to bomb Taiwan and Japan and the american carriers bwahahahhaha!!!) that some completely out of reality ( and lacking basic observation skills!) western writers and even some members here believe.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372432
    mack8
    Participant

    Juts to check for myself , if it’s ok ,there are now at least four J-10Bs identified right ? We got the first one 01/1031( prototype), we got 03, then 1034, and finally now the WS-10 equiped 05/1035, is this correct ?
    Plus we also have the ESA radar airframe seen few months ago , not sure if that’s just a test bed or a flying airframe.

    Judging by what is rumoured to be chinese practice , J-10B 02 should be the static then, right ?

    Thanks.:)

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2374590
    mack8
    Participant

    if some one orders a MiG-35 at MAKS, I’ll punch a puppy and kick a kitten, just for you!!!

    What’s the matter, affraid to pick someone your own size? :confused:

    I know i keep asking, BUT …where are the two MiG-35 demonstrators atm ? Haven’t seen anything about then in, well, very long time.

    IMHO i see two possibilities …either they’re languishing somewhere on an airfield or hangar maybe OKB’s… in which case maybe Hotdog is right. But not a pic or piece of information nothing anywhere ?

    OR… they are in Akhtyubinsk doing serious testing ( weapons and electronics ) in which case the programe is not so dead.;) Since it seems not a single soul (read spotters etc ) can get even close to Akhtyubinsk without permission, maybe their absence is in a way sort of good news for the programme?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2374631
    mack8
    Participant

    You should save those remarks for after MAKS 2011. You never know. 😉

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2374846
    mack8
    Participant

    Really looking forward to (as a “fanboy” :D), but of course whenever it’s ready and safe for it to fly, that’s when it should fly. Fanboys can wait.:)

    Speaking of which, did “51” flew lately ? ( i meen last 2-3 weeks ?). Thanks.

    in reply to: KFX-III TENDER IS ON #2374852
    mack8
    Participant

    Yeah , i guess i have to go with Fedaykin here …even if PAK-FA would come on top in regards to the technical/performance parameters (which imho it probably would ) and even technology transfer, you wouldn’t think the “american interests” in that country would allow that to happen, is it ? :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 2,087 total)