dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2262636
    mack8
    Participant

    Hello there! Su-30SM bort 55
    http://russianplanes.net/id116163

    MiG-29M2 747.
    http://russianplanes.net/id116162
    Quite bummed to hear about the MiG-35 delay, would that mean that all those under construction at MiG have already found a home? Interesting the pricetag, just 30 million each! I guess by 2016 the AESA will be fully developed, so probably the order for RuAF will be equipped as such ( barring something happening meaenwhile)
    On the other hand, perhaps some RuAF MiG-29s ( low hours S and 9.13 i presume- any idea what is the breakdown of the S/9.13/9.12/UB fleet?) will finally be upgraded to SMT standard? At least that will keep MiG busy.

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2262674
    mack8
    Participant

    One more thing: any idea if the new short, medium and long range AAMs for T-50 will be shown this MAKS ?

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2262677
    mack8
    Participant

    Actually, another thing regarding T-50s multiple AESA arrays, IF they have integrated an EA feature into the system, then at least the front coverage is more or less OVER 180 degrees, as opposed to something like max 60-70 degrees like a fixed front array as in F-22 and F-35 f.e.
    So then, if they have an ALR-94 class system with receivers in say wingtips ( apparently there’s dielectric paneling there) and particularly the tailcone to “sniff” any ****** trying to sneak around or behind, then the T-50 pilot needs only to turn his side array toward the opponent, and “blind” him ( even if only temporarely) with an EA attack or fire a missile, from 90 degrees relative to the opponent, which gets me back to something i’ve asked long ago and don’t think i’ve received a clear answer: are the AESA radars still susceptible to Doppler notch ?
    Oh and, could it be possible to actually integrate ALR-94 class “sniffing” modules within the AESA arrays?

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2262723
    mack8
    Participant

    Actually, another thing regarding T-50s multiple AESA arrays, IF say they have integrated an EA feature into the system, then in theory at least the front coverage is more or less OVER 180 degrees, as opposed to something like max 60-70 degrees for a fixed front array as in F-22 and F-35 f.e.
    So then, if they have an ALR-94 class system with receivers in say wingtips (apparently there’s dielectric paneling there) and particularly the tailcone to “sniff” any ****** trying to sneak around or behind, then the T-50 pilot needs only to turn his side array toward the opponent, and “blind” him ( even if only temporarily ) with an EA attack or fire a missile, from 90 degrees relative to the opponent, which gets me back to something i’ve asked long ago and don’t think i’ve received a clear answer: are the AESA radars still susceptible to Doppler notch ?
    Oh and, could it be possible to actually integrate ALR-94 class “sniffing” modules within the AESA arrays?

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2262754
    mack8
    Participant

    Great find Flateric. So there will be indeed 5 arrays on T-50, the front aspect N-036, the two cheek arrays and two in the wing leading edge ( in the recent T-50 documentary, they were showing anechoic chamber testing of those wing arrays). Any idea or rumour of what will be installed in the tail cone, would they go for a tail array for pretty much 360 degrees coverage, or perhaps a passive ESM system (ALR-94 class?) to “sniff” if anything gets behind the T-50 ?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2263006
    mack8
    Participant

    Meanwhile, at least 2 more Su-34s being flight tested at NAPO. I wonder if there is going to be a formal delivery of more Su-30, 35, 34 to VVS just before MAKS, would be good publicity.
    http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058__3.jpg
    http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058_1_2.jpg
    http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058_2.jpg
    http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058_3.jpg

    in reply to: Strange Air Forces: Royal Malaysian Air Force #2263042
    mack8
    Participant

    Thanks for your insight and links Fariz, interesting reads.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2263047
    mack8
    Participant

    This is the photo from aug.12:
    http://russianplanes.net/id115763

    Interesting stuff although this comes in contradiction with something i’ve read about few days ago, namely that the VVS gave up the idea of upgrading legacy MiG-29 and Su-27 (further airframes in it’s case), and instead getting new airframes( Su-30, Su-35 etc. and MiG-35?). Hope there is a news piece about it somewhere and am not reading too much into usual internet chatter.
    Mind you, i guess it makes sens to piggyback on the indian UPG programme, the VVS can probably have some kits for it’s MiG-29s at a pretty good price now. Still waiting for the MiG-35 order though (even if only as a Phulcrum phan ;))

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2263113
    mack8
    Participant

    Oh yes, i completely forgot about that. Thanks alot! Question is where are the SMTs coming from, are there STILL some legacy airframes left at MiG, or are they going to be upgrades of VVS birds or what ?

    On another note, what is this ? As in, is it a NEW MiG-29M2/35 airframe? There is a photo of the bortless MiG from aug. 12, still showing “MiG-35” titles under the canopy. Did they had time to repaint it and add the bort number (747)?
    http://russianplanes.net/id116029

    in reply to: Strange Air Forces: Royal Malaysian Air Force #2263570
    mack8
    Participant

    Fariz, thank you for your very interesting and insightful posts here. If i may ask something that i’ve always been eager to find out, how did your Su-30MKMs and MiG-29Ns fared against the F/A-18D, american Super Hornets and other types RMAF exercised with like F-16, F-15 etc.? How did they do when pitted against the opposition especially in A-A combat, but also A-G as well (probably only the MKMs on that part)? Thank you.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2263637
    mack8
    Participant

    Yeah i recall about the modified 9-53, but what Pogo (you mean Pogosyan right) said and when, i must have missed that? Thanks.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2263653
    mack8
    Participant

    Among other things, in this aug. 4th vid possibly a new fully painted Su-30SM shown, although they’ve obscured very carefully the bort! In the hall, you can see several SM under construction, one of them number 09.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X2zFXj8DR5M#at=19

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 12 #2263669
    mack8
    Participant

    So what is the story of this 9.19 SMT? What is the purpose of the mods, especially electronics and CMDS?
    http://russianplanes.net/id115888

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2263674
    mack8
    Participant

    052 back flying.

    http://russianplanes.net/id115870
    http://russianplanes.net/id115874
    http://russianplanes.net/id115930

    It has the same airflow measuring device on the inside of (right only?) intake trunk as on 051.

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2264372
    mack8
    Participant

    I’m also curious what is the purpose of those 3 cutouts (or vents ?) on the sliding canopy aft of the transparency.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 2,087 total)