Hello there! Su-30SM bort 55
http://russianplanes.net/id116163
MiG-29M2 747.
http://russianplanes.net/id116162
Quite bummed to hear about the MiG-35 delay, would that mean that all those under construction at MiG have already found a home? Interesting the pricetag, just 30 million each! I guess by 2016 the AESA will be fully developed, so probably the order for RuAF will be equipped as such ( barring something happening meaenwhile)
On the other hand, perhaps some RuAF MiG-29s ( low hours S and 9.13 i presume- any idea what is the breakdown of the S/9.13/9.12/UB fleet?) will finally be upgraded to SMT standard? At least that will keep MiG busy.
One more thing: any idea if the new short, medium and long range AAMs for T-50 will be shown this MAKS ?
Actually, another thing regarding T-50s multiple AESA arrays, IF they have integrated an EA feature into the system, then at least the front coverage is more or less OVER 180 degrees, as opposed to something like max 60-70 degrees like a fixed front array as in F-22 and F-35 f.e.
So then, if they have an ALR-94 class system with receivers in say wingtips ( apparently there’s dielectric paneling there) and particularly the tailcone to “sniff” any ****** trying to sneak around or behind, then the T-50 pilot needs only to turn his side array toward the opponent, and “blind” him ( even if only temporarely) with an EA attack or fire a missile, from 90 degrees relative to the opponent, which gets me back to something i’ve asked long ago and don’t think i’ve received a clear answer: are the AESA radars still susceptible to Doppler notch ?
Oh and, could it be possible to actually integrate ALR-94 class “sniffing” modules within the AESA arrays?
Actually, another thing regarding T-50s multiple AESA arrays, IF say they have integrated an EA feature into the system, then in theory at least the front coverage is more or less OVER 180 degrees, as opposed to something like max 60-70 degrees for a fixed front array as in F-22 and F-35 f.e.
So then, if they have an ALR-94 class system with receivers in say wingtips (apparently there’s dielectric paneling there) and particularly the tailcone to “sniff” any ****** trying to sneak around or behind, then the T-50 pilot needs only to turn his side array toward the opponent, and “blind” him ( even if only temporarily ) with an EA attack or fire a missile, from 90 degrees relative to the opponent, which gets me back to something i’ve asked long ago and don’t think i’ve received a clear answer: are the AESA radars still susceptible to Doppler notch ?
Oh and, could it be possible to actually integrate ALR-94 class “sniffing” modules within the AESA arrays?
Great find Flateric. So there will be indeed 5 arrays on T-50, the front aspect N-036, the two cheek arrays and two in the wing leading edge ( in the recent T-50 documentary, they were showing anechoic chamber testing of those wing arrays). Any idea or rumour of what will be installed in the tail cone, would they go for a tail array for pretty much 360 degrees coverage, or perhaps a passive ESM system (ALR-94 class?) to “sniff” if anything gets behind the T-50 ?
Meanwhile, at least 2 more Su-34s being flight tested at NAPO. I wonder if there is going to be a formal delivery of more Su-30, 35, 34 to VVS just before MAKS, would be good publicity.
http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058__3.jpg
http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058_1_2.jpg
http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058_2.jpg
http://www.mycity-military.com/slika.php?slika=143473_137660058_3.jpg
Thanks for your insight and links Fariz, interesting reads.
This is the photo from aug.12:
http://russianplanes.net/id115763
Interesting stuff although this comes in contradiction with something i’ve read about few days ago, namely that the VVS gave up the idea of upgrading legacy MiG-29 and Su-27 (further airframes in it’s case), and instead getting new airframes( Su-30, Su-35 etc. and MiG-35?). Hope there is a news piece about it somewhere and am not reading too much into usual internet chatter.
Mind you, i guess it makes sens to piggyback on the indian UPG programme, the VVS can probably have some kits for it’s MiG-29s at a pretty good price now. Still waiting for the MiG-35 order though (even if only as a Phulcrum phan ;))
Oh yes, i completely forgot about that. Thanks alot! Question is where are the SMTs coming from, are there STILL some legacy airframes left at MiG, or are they going to be upgrades of VVS birds or what ?
On another note, what is this ? As in, is it a NEW MiG-29M2/35 airframe? There is a photo of the bortless MiG from aug. 12, still showing “MiG-35” titles under the canopy. Did they had time to repaint it and add the bort number (747)?
http://russianplanes.net/id116029
Fariz, thank you for your very interesting and insightful posts here. If i may ask something that i’ve always been eager to find out, how did your Su-30MKMs and MiG-29Ns fared against the F/A-18D, american Super Hornets and other types RMAF exercised with like F-16, F-15 etc.? How did they do when pitted against the opposition especially in A-A combat, but also A-G as well (probably only the MKMs on that part)? Thank you.
Yeah i recall about the modified 9-53, but what Pogo (you mean Pogosyan right) said and when, i must have missed that? Thanks.
Among other things, in this aug. 4th vid possibly a new fully painted Su-30SM shown, although they’ve obscured very carefully the bort! In the hall, you can see several SM under construction, one of them number 09.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X2zFXj8DR5M#at=19
So what is the story of this 9.19 SMT? What is the purpose of the mods, especially electronics and CMDS?
http://russianplanes.net/id115888
052 back flying.
http://russianplanes.net/id115870
http://russianplanes.net/id115874
http://russianplanes.net/id115930
It has the same airflow measuring device on the inside of (right only?) intake trunk as on 051.
I’m also curious what is the purpose of those 3 cutouts (or vents ?) on the sliding canopy aft of the transparency.